Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Chip Old
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2000 6:57 am

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Chip Old » Wed May 08, 2002 6:18 am

On Wed, 8 May 2002, Donald Wilkinson wrote:
> You had actual live operators on yer party lines???!!!!!!! On our party > lines, anywhere from eight to thirty parties, one had to signal one's > desired number oneself, with the crank. For example, our number was 13, > hence one long crank, and three shorts. Lotta cranks, eh? (this was in > Canada).
Don, even you aren't that old! -- Chip Old 1948 M.G. TC TC6710 XPAG7430 NEMGTR #2271 Cub Hill, Maryland 1962 Triumph TR4 CT3154LO CT3479E fold@bcpl.net

Ray
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:55 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Ray » Wed May 08, 2002 6:33 am

All, You guys are killing me!! I remember US numbers with stuff like GReenfield 2-3847, and my Grandmother, who lived in the country in the South had a party line. The first time we moved to England, if you wanted to call relatives in the States first you had to ring up the overseas operator, give her the number, and then when the call went through, she rang you back. Our phone number in the village of Cheam was only four or five numbers long! Our house at 41 Nonsuch Walk was heated by a combination coal/coke/steam system........and it was my job to get up at 0430 to start the fire in the boiler warm it up... First the coal, then the coke when the fire got hot enough, then turn on the valve in the output once the needle came off the rest. Pretty soon, you couldn't see your breath anymore, and everyone else got up. The bus to school at the base came at 0600, stopping only up the road, so you had to wake up quickly. No whining tolerated. In fact, far less whinging all around.... The second time we moved there in the mid '60's after a short stint in the US we had "mod cons"! I am glad that no one took offense at the questionnaire. I am enjoying the responses! Best, Ray
> You had actual live operators on yer party lines???!!!!!!! On our party > lines, anywhere from eight to thirty parties, one had to signal one's > desired number oneself, with the crank. For example, our number was 13, > hence one long crank, and three shorts. Lotta cranks, eh? (this was in > Canada). > > Don > TC 7993 >

Badger
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:10 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Badger » Wed May 08, 2002 7:50 am

You had phones???!!!!!!!!!! Where I grew up, we communicated by smoke signals. Our "number" was three long puffs followed by two short ones. Badger
----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald Wilkinson" digitaldon@hotmail.com> To: fold@bcpl.net>; mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Age test! NO LBC CONTENT > You had actual live operators on yer party lines???!!!!!!! On our party > lines, anywhere from eight to thirty parties, one had to signal one's > desired number oneself, with the crank. For example, our number was 13, > hence one long crank, and three shorts. Lotta cranks, eh? (this was in > Canada). > > Don > TC 7993 > > > >From: Chip Old fold@bcpl.net> > >To: MG-TABC mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> > >Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Age test! NO LBC CONTENT > >Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 08:48:19 -0400 (EDT) > > > >On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, BADGER wrote to MG-TABC: > > > > > I was cleaning out the attic the other day with my 12 year old son when > > > he got all excited because he had found a "new" kind of telephone - it > > > had a round dial on it that spins to get the numbers! Badger > > > >What's it doing in the attic? Three of the five phones in my house are > >old dial phones. One of them has been in continuous use since 1954, when > >it replaced the dial-less phone we used when we were still on a party > >line. You picked up the phone and waited for the operator to say "number > >please". Or, if someone else on the same party line was already using the > >line, you hung up and waited a while before trying again. > > > >-- > >Chip Old 1948 M.G. TC TC6710 XPAG7430 NEMGTR #2271 > >Cub Hill, Maryland 1962 Triumph TR4 CT3154LO CT3479E > >fold@bcpl.net > > > > > > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >

Badger
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:10 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Badger » Wed May 08, 2002 8:36 am

> You had phones???!!!!!!!!!! > Where I grew up, we communicated by smoke signals. Our "number" was three > long puffs followed by two short ones. > Badger >
Later on, we got an unlisted number trying to avoid the telemarketers selling guns and whiskey.
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Donald Wilkinson" digitaldon@hotmail.com> > To: fold@bcpl.net>; mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 9:08 AM > Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Age test! NO LBC CONTENT > > > > You had actual live operators on yer party lines???!!!!!!! On our party > > lines, anywhere from eight to thirty parties, one had to signal one's > > desired number oneself, with the crank. For example, our number was 13, > > hence one long crank, and three shorts. Lotta cranks, eh? (this was in > > Canada). > > > > Don > > TC 7993 > > > > > > >From: Chip Old fold@bcpl.net> > > >To: MG-TABC mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> > > >Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Age test! NO LBC CONTENT > > >Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 08:48:19 -0400 (EDT) > > > > > >On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, BADGER wrote to MG-TABC: > > > > > > > I was cleaning out the attic the other day with my 12 year old son > when > > > > he got all excited because he had found a "new" kind of telephone -
it
> > > > had a round dial on it that spins to get the numbers! Badger > > > > > >What's it doing in the attic? Three of the five phones in my house are > > >old dial phones. One of them has been in continuous use since 1954,
when
> > >it replaced the dial-less phone we used when we were still on a party > > >line. You picked up the phone and waited for the operator to say
"number
> > >please". Or, if someone else on the same party line was already using > the > > >line, you hung up and waited a while before trying again. > > > > > >-- > > >Chip Old 1948 M.G. TC TC6710 XPAG7430 NEMGTR #2271 > > >Cub Hill, Maryland 1962 Triumph TR4 CT3154LO CT3479E > > >fold@bcpl.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

Gene Gillam
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2000 4:09 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Gene Gillam » Wed May 08, 2002 8:43 am

Badger wrote:
> Where I grew up, we communicated by smoke signals.
Holy dancing cows!!! You had fire????? Grin, Gene

Badger
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:10 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Badger » Wed May 08, 2002 9:34 am

> > Badger wrote: > > Where I grew up, we communicated by smoke signals. > > Holy dancing cows!!! You had fire????? > > Grin, > Gene >
Hell no Gene! We just whipped us up a whole lot o' dust an' PRETENDED it was smoke. Badger
> >

WDHarmer@aol.com
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2000 7:42 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by WDHarmer@aol.com » Wed May 08, 2002 9:57 am

Do you remember when "Henry Ford couldn't even fix the running board on a Chandler six?"

Locktc7440@aol.com
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 01, 2000 5:31 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Locktc7440@aol.com » Wed May 08, 2002 11:53 am

I still have an old dial type in the basement...works good!!!

Locktc7440@aol.com
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 01, 2000 5:31 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Locktc7440@aol.com » Wed May 08, 2002 12:00 pm

You lucky guys that had fire and smoke... We used hollow logs and big sticks!!!

Sam Suklis
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2002 5:34 pm

Re: Age test! NO LBC CONTENT

Post by Sam Suklis » Wed May 08, 2002 2:39 pm

> > Badger wrote: > > Where I grew up, we communicated by smoke signals.
Gene wrote:
> > Holy dancing cows!!! You had fire????? > > Grin, > Gene >
That's LUXURY, that is! Here in Oregon, it rains so much we can't have fire. We have to train spotted owls to carry our messages, and the recipients always eat the owls, so we never get answers. Sometimes we go for years without hearing from anyone. Sam
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests