On 3/27/2012 9:21 AM, mechanizeinc wrote: > > > The Continentals were awesome tires for the street because they are > soft. I think they stick on wet roads better than D606s. But that same > attribute makes 'em last about as long as a pencil eraser... and I > make a lot of mistakes! > > The fact that the D606 is less money and lasts a bit longer, plus is a > bit more aggressive knobby than the TK-80. And the sidewall strength > issue I discussed in the post. > > Mech > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > , "mechanizeinc" > wrote: > > > > > > I always do the same thing with my tires; Crazy $#!+ > > > > I can be going along fine. Mellow. Tame. You could call me grandpa. > Then, a wild hair, crazy traffic, or an accident requires evasive > maneuvers. I like hopping up on the median or diving into the woods. > > > > This is why the D606 rocks. It is 112mph or so speed rated and does > great on wet grass, wet pavement, sand and mud. The side wall is so > strong they will run flat so blown tubes aren't as dangerous at > freeway speeds. > > > > If I'm planning a long trip, I mount D606s and have replacements > lined up 3000 miles into my route. > > > > Mech > > Who is still going to kinda sorta motard with a 19 front and K761s > despite his better judgement. > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > , mark ward wrote: > > > > > > Egg's > > > > > > "Special" 6 for $1., Regulary $2. a dozen. > > > > > > Would you like 6 or..... half a dozen? > > > It's all in the planning ahead stage, WHAT are you planning on > doing with the "EGGS? > > > > > > > > > When I plan on a LONG trip, (more pavement) I get longer lasting > tires = MORE $$ > > > > > > If planing on running hard, in areas I do not know & possible > sharp rocks, nails ect. I get average tires like 606's. > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
widget verse apps & differance???? (nklr)
-
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:32 am
tires
Gotcha. Soft is true. For sure.
Wear out is true. For sure.
Sidewall? OK, I'll take your word for it.
I think the knobbies are the same though.
Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP
+1 916 966 9060
FAX +1 916 966 9068
===============================================
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:18 am
tires
Sidewalls are what I would like to know more facts about. (for flats etc.)
g> wrote:
From: RobertWichert
Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Tires
To: "mechanizeinc"
Cc: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2012, 4:44 PM
Gotcha. Soft is true. For sure.
Wear out is true. For sure.
Sidewall? OK, I'll take your word for it.
I think the knobbies are the same though.
Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP
+1 916 966 9060
FAX +1 916 966 9068
===============================================
On 3/27/2012 9:21 AM, mechanizeinc wrote: > > > The Continentals were awesome tires for the street because they are > soft. I think they stick on wet roads better than D606s. But that same > attribute makes 'em last about as long as a pencil eraser... and I > make a lot of mistakes! > > The fact that the D606 is less money and lasts a bit longer, plus is a > bit more aggressive knobby than the TK-80. And the sidewall strength > issue I discussed in the post. > > Mech > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > , "mechanizeinc" > wrote: > > > > > > I always do the same thing with my tires; Crazy $#!+ > > > > I can be going along fine. Mellow. Tame. You could call me grandpa. > Then, a wild hair, crazy traffic, or an accident requires evasive > maneuvers. I like hopping up on the median or diving into the woods. > > > > This is why the D606 rocks. It is 112mph or so speed rated and does > great on wet grass, wet pavement, sand and mud. The side wall is so > strong they will run flat so blown tubes aren't as dangerous at > freeway speeds. > > > > If I'm planning a long trip, I mount D606s and have replacements > lined up 3000 miles into my route. > > > > Mech > > Who is still going to kinda sorta motard with a 19 front and K761s > despite his better judgement. > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > , mark ward wrote: > > > > > > Egg's > > > > > > "Special" 6 for $1., Regulary $2. a dozen. > > > > > > Would you like 6 or..... half a dozen? > > > It's all in the planning ahead stage, WHAT are you planning on > doing with the "EGGS? > > > > > > > > > When I plan on a LONG trip, (more pavement) I get longer lasting > tires = MORE $$ > > > > > > If planing on running hard, in areas I do not know & possible > sharp rocks, nails ect. I get average tires like 606's. > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2000 5:09 pm
tires
The knobs seem longer and seem to last longer (606-to me).
Criswell
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:17 AM, RobertWichert wrote: > The D606 is the same "big block" style as the TKC 80. Is there a reason > that you like the D606 and you don't like the TKC 80? > > Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP > +1 916 966 9060 > FAX +1 916 966 9068 > > =============================================== > > On 3/27/2012 8:33 AM, mechanizeinc wrote: > > > > > > I always do the same thing with my tires; Crazy $#!+ > > > > I can be going along fine. Mellow. Tame. You could call me grandpa. > > Then, a wild hair, crazy traffic, or an accident requires evasive > > maneuvers. I like hopping up on the median or diving into the woods. > > > > This is why the D606 rocks. It is 112mph or so speed rated and does > > great on wet grass, wet pavement, sand and mud. The side wall is so > > strong they will run flat so blown tubes aren't as dangerous at > > freeway speeds. > > > > If I'm planning a long trip, I mount D606s and have replacements lined > > up 3000 miles into my route. > > > > Mech > > Who is still going to kinda sorta motard with a 19 front and K761s > > despite his better judgement. > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > > , mark ward wrote: > > > > > > Egg's > > > > > > "Special" 6 for $1., Regulary $2. a dozen. > > > > > > Would you like 6 or..... half a dozen? > > > It's all in the planning ahead stage, WHAT are you planning on doing > > with the "EGGS? > > > > > > > > > When I plan on a LONG trip, (more pavement) I get longer lasting > > tires = MORE $$ > > > > > > If planing on running hard, in areas I do not know & possible sharp > > rocks, nails ect. I get average tires like 606's. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:32 am
tires
Well, we should be MEASURING those knobs! My TKC 80 knobs are about
0.3" long in the middle of the rear tire. It's almost new.
How long are your knobs?
Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP
+1 916 966 9060
FAX +1 916 966 9068
===============================================
On 3/27/2012 11:45 AM, Ron Criswell wrote: > The knobs seem longer and seem to last longer (606-to me). > > Criswell > > Sent from my iPad > > On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:17 AM, RobertWichert > wrote: > >> The D606 is the same "big block" style as the TKC 80. Is there a reason >> that you like the D606 and you don't like the TKC 80? >> >> Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP >> +1 916 966 9060 >> FAX +1 916 966 9068 >> >> =============================================== >> >> On 3/27/2012 8:33 AM, mechanizeinc wrote: >> > >> > >> > I always do the same thing with my tires; Crazy $#!+ >> > >> > I can be going along fine. Mellow. Tame. You could call me grandpa. >> > Then, a wild hair, crazy traffic, or an accident requires evasive >> > maneuvers. I like hopping up on the median or diving into the woods. >> > >> > This is why the D606 rocks. It is 112mph or so speed rated and does >> > great on wet grass, wet pavement, sand and mud. The side wall is so >> > strong they will run flat so blown tubes aren't as dangerous at >> > freeway speeds. >> > >> > If I'm planning a long trip, I mount D606s and have replacements lined >> > up 3000 miles into my route. >> > >> > Mech >> > Who is still going to kinda sorta motard with a 19 front and K761s >> > despite his better judgement. >> > >> > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com >> >> > , mark ward wrote: >> > > >> > > Egg's >> > > >> > > "Special" 6 for $1., Regulary $2. a dozen. >> > > >> > > Would you like 6 or..... half a dozen? >> > > It's all in the planning ahead stage, WHAT are you planning on doing >> > with the "EGGS? >> > > >> > > >> > > When I plan on a LONG trip, (more pavement) I get longer lasting >> > tires = MORE $$ >> > > >> > > If planing on running hard, in areas I do not know & possible sharp >> > rocks, nails ect. I get average tires like 606's. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:02 pm
tires
Listers,
This was first posted here on 9 August 2004. Maybe it's still useful for
the tires thread currently going on since the data collected includes
Kenda K270, Dunlop D606 and Continental TKC80 tires.
Oh, this data collection started as part of a "contest" for the group on
this ride. We each were going to put $10 in a pool. At a designated
point we'd determine which tire was the best for wear per mile. The
"winner" would get the money and then take the group to dinner. Kind of
a win win for everyone. The winner in CO was Steve with the TKC80.
Martin was already gone by a day and Bill left the next morning. If I
was doing this again I'd suggest we compare price versus miles/wear. I
think the K270s would have taken the winnings then. : )
Best,
Jeff Saline
ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal
Airheads Beemer Club www.airheads.org
The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota
75 R90/6, 03 KLR650
<><><><>
<><><><>
KLRers,
The first copy lost the data formatting. Hopefully this will come
through in a more useable format.
Jeff
***********************************
KLRers,
I recently returned from the Great Divide Ride, Canada to Mexico
following the Continental Divide, mostly on dirt. I measured rear tire
tread depth on each bike each day and recorded mileage and tread depth in
32nds of an inch. Four of the tires were new at my shop at the beginning
of the ride. One tire had about 1,500 miles on it I think when I started
measuring it at the Canadian border. Here is the data I collected by
measuring each tire in the same location at the end of each day's ride.
The measurement location was next to the valve stem on the rear tire in
the center of the tread. Tire pressures were not checked and if I was
doing this again I'd also record tire pressures. Bikes were fully loaded
(probably 100 or more pounds gear on each bike) and on pavement we
usually ran 65-75 mph as verified by a GPS. On the dirt and gravel roads
we ran from a crawl to 65 mph but I'm guessing here that most speeds were
20-45 mph in the dirt. Only two bikes made the entire trip. Two guys
had to leave after about a week to go back to work. One bike was run
over by a pick up truck in Colorado and totaled. The rider walked away
from the scene. We were on some pavement everyday but usually it was
gravel or dirt roads. Temps ranged from low 40s to mid 70s most days.
We had high 90s on the first day and that was also pavement and speed.
New tires lose tread fast at first as you can see from the below data.
My last day the temps were probably from 70-90 degrees and speeds stayed
about 65-70 actual. I was surprised that I didn't lose any tread on that
day. I'll be staying with Kenda K270s as I like the price for the
performance. For tire pressures I ran 32 front and 36 rear on the Kendas
on pavement and about 27-29 front and 30-32 rear on dirt/gravel. I also
used monster tubes in both tires. I like them but it took a lot of
weight to balance the tires with the monster tubes.
Best,
Jeff Saline
ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal
Airheads Beemer Club www.airheads.org
The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota
75 R90/6, 03 KLR650, 79 R100RT
Tire #1 Jeff Kenda K270 5.10X17
Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface
4502 0 0 17 N/A
5018 516 516 15 Paved
5450 432 948 14 Paved
5691 241 1189 14 Paved/Dirt
5878 187 1376 12 Paved/Dirt
5997 119 1495 12 Dirt
6234 237 1732 11 Dirt
6416 182 1914 11 Dirt
6736 320 2234 10 Dirt
6878 142 2376 10 Dirt
7179 301 2677 10 Dirt
7356 177 2854 9 Dirt
7503 147 3001 9 Dirt
7746 243 3244 9 Dirt
8074 328 3572 9 Paved
8333 259 3831 8 Dirt
8462 129 3960 8 Sand/Paved
8587 125 4085 7 Paved
8831 244 4329 7 Paved
9643 812 5141 7 Paved
Tire #2 Martin Kenda K270 5.10X17
Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface
7368 0 0 17 N/A
7877 509 509 15 Paved
8308 431 940 13 Paved
8546 238 1178 12 Paved/Dirt
8737 191 1369 12 Paved/Dirt
8853 116 1485 12 Dirt
9087 234 1719 11 Dirt
9266 179 1898 10 Dirt
Tire #3 Bill Dunlop D606 130/90-17
Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface
5751 0 0 18 N/A
6261 510 510 17 Paved
6688 427 937 16 Paved
6925 237 1174 15 Paved/Dirt
7113 188 1362 14 Paved/Dirt
7231 118 1480 13 Dirt
7465 234 1714 12 Dirt
7645 180 1894 12 Dirt
7961 316 2210 12 Dirt
8103 142 2352 11 Dirt
Tire #4 Mike Dunlop D606 130/90-17
Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface
23392 0 1500 12 Paved/Dirt
23636 244 1744 10 Paved/Dirt
23827 191 1935 10 Dirt
23945 118 2053 10 Dirt
24178 233 2286 10 Dirt
24357 179 2465 10 Dirt
24675 318 2783 9 Dirt
24815 140 2923 9 Dirt
25115 300 3223 9 Dirt
25293 178 3401 8 Dirt
Bike Totaled
Tire #5 Steve Continental TKC80 130/80-17
Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface
27862 0 0 12 N/A
28368 506 506 11 Paved
28793 425 931 10 Paved
29029 236 1167 10 Paved/Dirt
29213 184 1351 9 Paved/Dirt
29330 117 1468 9 Dirt
29562 232 1700 9 Dirt
29740 178 1878 8 Dirt
30053 313 2191 8 Dirt
30194 141 2332 8 Dirt
30490 296 2628 7 Dirt
30661 171 2799 7 Dirt
30792 131 2930 7 Dirt
31030 238 3168 7 Dirt
31352 322 3490 6 Paved
31612 260 3750 6 Dirt
31740 128 3878 6 Sand/Paved
31863 123 4001 5 Paved
32613 750 4751 5 Paved
.
.
____________________________________________________________
57 Year Old Looks 27
Local Woman Reveals Wrinkle Secret That Has Doctors Angry.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f723794f241526f7a77st05vuc
-
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:32 am
tires
Sure enough! Your knobs are bigger than my knobs!
(Actually the TKC 80 knobs in this study are also bigger than my knobs -
strange)
Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP
+1 916 966 9060
FAX +1 916 966 9068
===============================================
On 3/27/2012 2:56 PM, Jeff Saline wrote: > Tire #1 Jeff Kenda K270 5.10X17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 4502 0 0 17 N/A > 5018 516 516 15 Paved > 5450 432 948 14 Paved > 5691 241 1189 14 Paved/Dirt > 5878 187 1376 12 Paved/Dirt > 5997 119 1495 12 Dirt > 6234 237 1732 11 Dirt > 6416 182 1914 11 Dirt > 6736 320 2234 10 Dirt > 6878 142 2376 10 Dirt > 7179 301 2677 10 Dirt > 7356 177 2854 9 Dirt > 7503 147 3001 9 Dirt > 7746 243 3244 9 Dirt > 8074 328 3572 9 Paved > 8333 259 3831 8 Dirt > 8462 129 3960 8 Sand/Paved > 8587 125 4085 7 Paved > 8831 244 4329 7 Paved > 9643 812 5141 7 Paved > > Tire #2 Martin Kenda K270 5.10X17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 7368 0 0 17 N/A > 7877 509 509 15 Paved > 8308 431 940 13 Paved > 8546 238 1178 12 Paved/Dirt > 8737 191 1369 12 Paved/Dirt > 8853 116 1485 12 Dirt > 9087 234 1719 11 Dirt > 9266 179 1898 10 Dirt > > Tire #3 Bill Dunlop D606 130/90-17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 5751 0 0 18 N/A > 6261 510 510 17 Paved > 6688 427 937 16 Paved > 6925 237 1174 15 Paved/Dirt > 7113 188 1362 14 Paved/Dirt > 7231 118 1480 13 Dirt > 7465 234 1714 12 Dirt > 7645 180 1894 12 Dirt > 7961 316 2210 12 Dirt > 8103 142 2352 11 Dirt > > Tire #4 Mike Dunlop D606 130/90-17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 23392 0 1500 12 Paved/Dirt > 23636 244 1744 10 Paved/Dirt > 23827 191 1935 10 Dirt > 23945 118 2053 10 Dirt > 24178 233 2286 10 Dirt > 24357 179 2465 10 Dirt > 24675 318 2783 9 Dirt > 24815 140 2923 9 Dirt > 25115 300 3223 9 Dirt > 25293 178 3401 8 Dirt > Bike Totaled > > Tire #5 Steve Continental TKC80 130/80-17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 27862 0 0 12 N/A > 28368 506 506 11 Paved > 28793 425 931 10 Paved > 29029 236 1167 10 Paved/Dirt > 29213 184 1351 9 Paved/Dirt > 29330 117 1468 9 Dirt > 29562 232 1700 9 Dirt > 29740 178 1878 8 Dirt > 30053 313 2191 8 Dirt > 30194 141 2332 8 Dirt > 30490 296 2628 7 Dirt > 30661 171 2799 7 Dirt > 30792 131 2930 7 Dirt > 31030 238 3168 7 Dirt > 31352 322 3490 6 Paved > 31612 260 3750 6 Dirt > 31740 128 3878 6 Sand/Paved > 31863 123 4001 5 Paved > 32613 750 4751 5 Paved
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:03 pm
tires
Not that you were asking me, but the TKC isn't nearly as aggressive as the 606. The TKC has slightly better road manners and FAR worse off road handling. You'll only find this out at the limit of traction, leaned way over in the dirt and hoping the side knobs hook up. . . I almost ended up in traction when I learned this lesson. If you look at these tires side by side from the front or rear you can see the difference in the profile and height of the knobs. The TKC is far more rounded in overall profile and the 606 has much taller knobs.
Bottom line, where do you do your most aggressive riding, not where do you do your most riding.
da Vermonster (yes I still blame the TKC 80 for my ankle injury in LA-B-2-V 2007)
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, RobertWichert wrote: > > The D606 is the same "big block" style as the TKC 80. Is there a reason > that you like the D606 and you don't like the TKC 80? > > > Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP > +1 916 966 9060 > FAX +1 916 966 9068 > > > > > > > > =============================================== > > > On 3/27/2012 8:33 AM, mechanizeinc wrote: > > > > > > I always do the same thing with my tires; Crazy $#!+ > > > > I can be going along fine. Mellow. Tame. You could call me grandpa. > > Then, a wild hair, crazy traffic, or an accident requires evasive > > maneuvers. I like hopping up on the median or diving into the woods. > > > > This is why the D606 rocks. It is 112mph or so speed rated and does > > great on wet grass, wet pavement, sand and mud. The side wall is so > > strong they will run flat so blown tubes aren't as dangerous at > > freeway speeds. > > > > If I'm planning a long trip, I mount D606s and have replacements lined > > up 3000 miles into my route. > > > > Mech > > Who is still going to kinda sorta motard with a 19 front and K761s > > despite his better judgement. > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > > , mark ward wrote: > > > > > > Egg's > > > > > > "Special" 6 for $1., Regulary $2. a dozen. > > > > > > Would you like 6 or..... half a dozen? > > > It's all in the planning ahead stage, WHAT are you planning on doing > > with the "EGGS? > > > > > > > > > When I plan on a LONG trip, (more pavement) I get longer lasting > > tires = MORE $$ > > > > > > If planing on running hard, in areas I do not know & possible sharp > > rocks, nails ect. I get average tires like 606's. > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2000 5:09 pm
tires
Exactly my opinion.
Criswell
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 27, 2012, at 8:48 PM, "dat brooklyn bum" wrote: > Not that you were asking me, but the TKC isn't nearly as aggressive as the 606. The TKC has slightly better road manners and FAR worse off road handling. You'll only find this out at the limit of traction, leaned way over in the dirt and hoping the side knobs hook up. . . I almost ended up in traction when I learned this lesson. If you look at these tires side by side from the front or rear you can see the difference in the profile and height of the knobs. The TKC is far more rounded in overall profile and the 606 has much taller knobs. > > Bottom line, where do you do your most aggressive riding, not where do you do your most riding. > > da Vermonster (yes I still blame the TKC 80 for my ankle injury in LA-B-2-V 2007) > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, RobertWichert wrote: > > > > The D606 is the same "big block" style as the TKC 80. Is there a reason > > that you like the D606 and you don't like the TKC 80? > > > > > > Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP > > +1 916 966 9060 > > FAX +1 916 966 9068 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =============================================== > > > > > > On 3/27/2012 8:33 AM, mechanizeinc wrote: > > > > > > > > > I always do the same thing with my tires; Crazy $#!+ > > > > > > I can be going along fine. Mellow. Tame. You could call me grandpa. > > > Then, a wild hair, crazy traffic, or an accident requires evasive > > > maneuvers. I like hopping up on the median or diving into the woods. > > > > > > This is why the D606 rocks. It is 112mph or so speed rated and does > > > great on wet grass, wet pavement, sand and mud. The side wall is so > > > strong they will run flat so blown tubes aren't as dangerous at > > > freeway speeds. > > > > > > If I'm planning a long trip, I mount D606s and have replacements lined > > > up 3000 miles into my route. > > > > > > Mech > > > Who is still going to kinda sorta motard with a 19 front and K761s > > > despite his better judgement. > > > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > > > , mark ward wrote: > > > > > > > > Egg's > > > > > > > > "Special" 6 for $1., Regulary $2. a dozen. > > > > > > > > Would you like 6 or..... half a dozen? > > > > It's all in the planning ahead stage, WHAT are you planning on doing > > > with the "EGGS? > > > > > > > > > > > > When I plan on a LONG trip, (more pavement) I get longer lasting > > > tires = MORE $$ > > > > > > > > If planing on running hard, in areas I do not know & possible sharp > > > rocks, nails ect. I get average tires like 606's. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:52 pm
tires
Last time I looked, the TKC cost about as much as the Mefo, in other words, as much as a pair of D606. Is that reason enough? The CW is, the TKC is better on pavement, and quieter than the D606. In fact, it is quieter, but I don't see where it works better. The D606 flat out works on pavement, and is better on dirt than the Continental. Plus, it is about the easiest tire to mount that I ever worked with on the KLR. (I actually think the K270 can be a pain. The bead is often reluctant to seat for me.)
My first encounter with the TKC was the one that came on my buddy's GS1150 Adventure. It evaporated in about 1200 miles. I still have his almost-new front take-off, just waiting to go on Shelly's R80GS someday, although it's probably too crusty by now.
I take kind of a jaundiced view of German tires in general. After years of watching Metzelers evaporate in 3500 miles on the back of my BMWs, and Contis not doing much better, while my Dunlops and Avons consistently gave me 10k or more, I have come to think of Metzelers in particular, and German tires in general, as overpriced and overrated.
Contis and now Mefos are tarred with the same brush.
I haven't heard anyone 'splain what justifies a triple-digit price on a dual sport tire.
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, RobertWichert wrote: > > The D606 is the same "big block" style as the TKC 80. Is there a reason > that you like the D606 and you don't like the TKC 80? > > > Robert Wichert P.Eng. LEED AP > +1 916 966 9060 > FAX +1 916 966 9068 > > > > > > > > =============================================== > > > On 3/27/2012 8:33 AM, mechanizeinc wrote: > > > > > > I always do the same thing with my tires; Crazy $#!+ > > > > I can be going along fine. Mellow. Tame. You could call me grandpa. > > Then, a wild hair, crazy traffic, or an accident requires evasive > > maneuvers. I like hopping up on the median or diving into the woods. > > > > This is why the D606 rocks. It is 112mph or so speed rated and does > > great on wet grass, wet pavement, sand and mud. The side wall is so > > strong they will run flat so blown tubes aren't as dangerous at > > freeway speeds. > > > > If I'm planning a long trip, I mount D606s and have replacements lined > > up 3000 miles into my route. > > > > Mech > > Who is still going to kinda sorta motard with a 19 front and K761s > > despite his better judgement. > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > > , mark ward wrote: > > > > > > Egg's > > > > > > "Special" 6 for $1., Regulary $2. a dozen. > > > > > > Would you like 6 or..... half a dozen? > > > It's all in the planning ahead stage, WHAT are you planning on doing > > with the "EGGS? > > > > > > > > > When I plan on a LONG trip, (more pavement) I get longer lasting > > tires = MORE $$ > > > > > > If planing on running hard, in areas I do not know & possible sharp > > rocks, nails ect. I get average tires like 606's. > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
-
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:52 pm
tires
On my first Moto Mutz trip to Mexico, I started out with a K270 that looked about half or 2/3 gone. Marty Mataya looked at it and laughed. He thought I was going to have to try to replace it somewhere down in the canyons. Other guys started the trip on new Karoos, MT21s, TKC80s. We probably only rode 2500 miles in 2 weeks. I watched all these other tires run their knobs completely off. At the end of the trip, my Kenda looked pretty much the same as it did at the start. I would have liked to say I had the last laugh, but I couldn't really be laughing at Marty, who did the whole ride on a castoff mx front and a grooved out street tire on the rear.
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Saline wrote: > > Listers, > > This was first posted here on 9 August 2004. Maybe it's still useful for > the tires thread currently going on since the data collected includes > Kenda K270, Dunlop D606 and Continental TKC80 tires. > > Oh, this data collection started as part of a "contest" for the group on > this ride. We each were going to put $10 in a pool. At a designated > point we'd determine which tire was the best for wear per mile. The > "winner" would get the money and then take the group to dinner. Kind of > a win win for everyone. The winner in CO was Steve with the TKC80. > Martin was already gone by a day and Bill left the next morning. If I > was doing this again I'd suggest we compare price versus miles/wear. I > think the K270s would have taken the winnings then. : ) > > Best, > > Jeff Saline > ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal > Airheads Beemer Club www.airheads.org > The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota > 75 R90/6, 03 KLR650 > <><><><> > <><><><> > KLRers, > > The first copy lost the data formatting. Hopefully this will come > through in a more useable format. > > Jeff > *********************************** > KLRers, > > I recently returned from the Great Divide Ride, Canada to Mexico > following the Continental Divide, mostly on dirt. I measured rear tire > tread depth on each bike each day and recorded mileage and tread depth in > 32nds of an inch. Four of the tires were new at my shop at the beginning > of the ride. One tire had about 1,500 miles on it I think when I started > measuring it at the Canadian border. Here is the data I collected by > measuring each tire in the same location at the end of each day's ride. > The measurement location was next to the valve stem on the rear tire in > the center of the tread. Tire pressures were not checked and if I was > doing this again I'd also record tire pressures. Bikes were fully loaded > (probably 100 or more pounds gear on each bike) and on pavement we > usually ran 65-75 mph as verified by a GPS. On the dirt and gravel roads > we ran from a crawl to 65 mph but I'm guessing here that most speeds were > 20-45 mph in the dirt. Only two bikes made the entire trip. Two guys > had to leave after about a week to go back to work. One bike was run > over by a pick up truck in Colorado and totaled. The rider walked away > from the scene. We were on some pavement everyday but usually it was > gravel or dirt roads. Temps ranged from low 40s to mid 70s most days. > We had high 90s on the first day and that was also pavement and speed. > New tires lose tread fast at first as you can see from the below data. > My last day the temps were probably from 70-90 degrees and speeds stayed > about 65-70 actual. I was surprised that I didn't lose any tread on that > day. I'll be staying with Kenda K270s as I like the price for the > performance. For tire pressures I ran 32 front and 36 rear on the Kendas > on pavement and about 27-29 front and 30-32 rear on dirt/gravel. I also > used monster tubes in both tires. I like them but it took a lot of > weight to balance the tires with the monster tubes. > > Best, > > Jeff Saline > ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal > Airheads Beemer Club www.airheads.org > The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota > 75 R90/6, 03 KLR650, 79 R100RT > > Tire #1 Jeff Kenda K270 5.10X17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 4502 0 0 17 N/A > 5018 516 516 15 Paved > 5450 432 948 14 Paved > 5691 241 1189 14 Paved/Dirt > 5878 187 1376 12 Paved/Dirt > 5997 119 1495 12 Dirt > 6234 237 1732 11 Dirt > 6416 182 1914 11 Dirt > 6736 320 2234 10 Dirt > 6878 142 2376 10 Dirt > 7179 301 2677 10 Dirt > 7356 177 2854 9 Dirt > 7503 147 3001 9 Dirt > 7746 243 3244 9 Dirt > 8074 328 3572 9 Paved > 8333 259 3831 8 Dirt > 8462 129 3960 8 Sand/Paved > 8587 125 4085 7 Paved > 8831 244 4329 7 Paved > 9643 812 5141 7 Paved > > Tire #2 Martin Kenda K270 5.10X17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 7368 0 0 17 N/A > 7877 509 509 15 Paved > 8308 431 940 13 Paved > 8546 238 1178 12 Paved/Dirt > 8737 191 1369 12 Paved/Dirt > 8853 116 1485 12 Dirt > 9087 234 1719 11 Dirt > 9266 179 1898 10 Dirt > > Tire #3 Bill Dunlop D606 130/90-17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 5751 0 0 18 N/A > 6261 510 510 17 Paved > 6688 427 937 16 Paved > 6925 237 1174 15 Paved/Dirt > 7113 188 1362 14 Paved/Dirt > 7231 118 1480 13 Dirt > 7465 234 1714 12 Dirt > 7645 180 1894 12 Dirt > 7961 316 2210 12 Dirt > 8103 142 2352 11 Dirt > > Tire #4 Mike Dunlop D606 130/90-17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 23392 0 1500 12 Paved/Dirt > 23636 244 1744 10 Paved/Dirt > 23827 191 1935 10 Dirt > 23945 118 2053 10 Dirt > 24178 233 2286 10 Dirt > 24357 179 2465 10 Dirt > 24675 318 2783 9 Dirt > 24815 140 2923 9 Dirt > 25115 300 3223 9 Dirt > 25293 178 3401 8 Dirt > Bike Totaled > > Tire #5 Steve Continental TKC80 130/80-17 > Odometer* Miles* Accumulative Miles*Tread Depth in 32nds"* Road Surface > 27862 0 0 12 N/A > 28368 506 506 11 Paved > 28793 425 931 10 Paved > 29029 236 1167 10 Paved/Dirt > 29213 184 1351 9 Paved/Dirt > 29330 117 1468 9 Dirt > 29562 232 1700 9 Dirt > 29740 178 1878 8 Dirt > 30053 313 2191 8 Dirt > 30194 141 2332 8 Dirt > 30490 296 2628 7 Dirt > 30661 171 2799 7 Dirt > 30792 131 2930 7 Dirt > 31030 238 3168 7 Dirt > 31352 322 3490 6 Paved > 31612 260 3750 6 Dirt > 31740 128 3878 6 Sand/Paved > 31863 123 4001 5 Paved > 32613 750 4751 5 Paved > > . > . > ____________________________________________________________ > 57 Year Old Looks 27 > Local Woman Reveals Wrinkle Secret That Has Doctors Angry. > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f723794f241526f7a77st05vuc >
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests