Gearbox numbering

[Jack Emdall]

G'day again group. I don't know on who's authority it was, that my latest query was tagged as " suspected junk mail " but that, in itself, is a load of hog wash. I had queried the group re: the stamped numbers on " T " series gearbox casings. One message went through OK, but; lo and behold, a repeat of the same message appeared, in my sent box, with an added surcharge tagging it as " suspected junk mail "? I do not know if the over ridden copy reached our group, or the original one did, but neither are to be considered as " junk mail ". Anyway, to relieve any doubts as to the authenticity of the exercise, please disregard all messages pertaining to the gearbox numbering question. In conclusion; I wish to convey my very special thanks, to the secret security force ( whoever they may be ), for their well spotted suspicion and for seriously picking my t--ts! Respectfully: Jack Emdall. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Chip Old]

You're barking up the wrong tree, Jack. Your message appeared on the MG-TABS list only once, and it was not tagged as junk mail. If you saw it tagged that way, then it was either your Internet provider's spam filter that did it before delivering it to your mailbox, or else some anti-spam software on your own PC. On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:04 -0800, Jack Emdall wrote to TABC GROUP:

> I don't know on who's authority it was, that my latest query was tagged > as " suspected junk mail " but that, in itself, is a load of hog wash. > > I had queried the group re: the stamped numbers on " T " series gearbox > casings. One message went through OK, but; lo and behold, a repeat of > the same message appeared, in my sent box, with an added surcharge > tagging it as " suspected junk mail "? I do not know if the over ridden > copy reached our group, or the original one did, but neither are to be > considered as " junk mail ". > > Anyway, to relieve any doubts as to the authenticity of the exercise, > please disregard all messages pertaining to the gearbox numbering > question. > > In conclusion; I wish to convey my very special thanks, to the secret > security force ( whoever they may be ), for their well spotted suspicion > and for seriously picking my t--ts! > > Respectfully: Jack Emdall. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >

-- Chip Old (Francis E. Old) E-Mail: fold@bcpl.net BCPL Network Administrator Phone: 410-887-6180 BCPL.NET Internet Services Manager FAX: 410-887-2091 Baltimore County Public Library 320 York Road Towson, MD 21204-5179 USA