Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:42 pm
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
Dear Gene; great idea about the Kamakazie unit-Datsun Steering. After Scott
drove yours he keeps reminding me about the Datsun conversion. Frankly my TC
becomes most interesting(Scarrrrry) starting at 45mph. Tried Carl Fritz
STP/Grease soup and it was some what better. Recently I shot pure grease into
Bishop Box and it was a little steadier to the left and loose to the right.
Was this vehicle like this from day one of MFG, or did time cause this. Every
thing is new on the front end I have read that a properly aligned TC handles
well. Mine handles like a Mack Truck. Can't believe these works of mechanical
art became so popular with this cockamamy steering control problem. I tend
strongly towards keeping it orignal with proper replacement parts from Mother
Moss. I am confused that such a great historic sports car handles so
erratically.Tally Ho! Thom Collins
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2001 6:23 pm
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
I used to feel the same way as you about the crappy steering on the TCs.
Then I had the good fortune of buying a one-owner '48 TC that had been
lovingly maintained by the original 92 year old owner until I bought it.
The steering on that car was totally stock, and totally wonderful......no
drifting to either side, and turned smooth as butter! I've since sold the
car, but at least I know that a well-maintained original steering box really
does work very well.
Bob
TC>Dear Gene; great idea about the Kamakazie unit-Datsun Steering. After Scott >drove yours he keeps reminding me about the Datsun conversion. Frankly my
into>becomes most interesting(Scarrrrry) starting at 45mph. Tried Carl Fritz >STP/Grease soup and it was some what better. Recently I shot pure grease
right.>Bishop Box and it was a little steadier to the left and loose to the
Every>Was this vehicle like this from day one of MFG, or did time cause this.
handles>thing is new on the front end I have read that a properly aligned TC
mechanical>well. Mine handles like a Mack Truck. Can't believe these works of
Mother>art became so popular with this cockamamy steering control problem. I tend >strongly towards keeping it orignal with proper replacement parts from
>Moss. I am confused that such a great historic sports car handles so >erratically.Tally Ho! Thom Collins
-
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2000 4:09 pm
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
Thom Collins wrote:
from Mother Moss. I am confused that such a great historic sports car handles so erratically.Tally Ho!>I tend strongly towards keeping it original with proper replacement parts
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:55 pm
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
I have had Phil do a box for my TB. He does great work, is reasonable in
cost, and prompt.
The box is better than new! (It has a Thompkins kit)
Best,
Ray
> > Thom, > > I think I heard that Phil Marino can rebuild a stock box in such a manner > that it steers like new. Has anyone had experience with his work in this > regard? That might be the way to go if you want to keep it original.. > > Gene
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 6:18 am
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
I have a batch of TA/TC Tompkins kits available for $55.00 US$ including
mail cost in North America ( Kit alone is $50.00 US$ ). The kit consists of
top cover with adjusting bolt and lock-nut, needle bearing, three BSF
correct length bolts. I do not supply the top column needle bearing as I
believe this to be a poor use of a needle bearing on a slow rotating column
and subject to a lot of dirt.
Email if interested.
Regards, Bob Grunau
I have had Phil do a box for my TB. He does great work, is reasonable in
cost, and prompt.
The box is better than new! (It has a Thompkins kit)
Best,
Ray
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2000 6:13 pm
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
I too have a Marino rebuilt box and agree that it is better than new
and reasonable in cost. I have mentioned this before but will again.
The box is only one part of the steering and in order to get good
steering in a TA, B or C you need to make sure ALL the steering and
suspension parts are in good shape and adjusted properly. You
wouldn't put new pistons in an engine with worn bearings and a
defective crank would you?
David Edgar, TC 5108
El Cajon, California
>I have had Phil do a box for my TB. He does great work, is reasonable in >cost, and prompt. >The box is better than new! (It has a Thompkins kit) >Best, >Ray > > > > Thom, > >> I think I heard that Phil Marino can rebuild a stock box in such a manner > > that it steers like new. Has anyone had experience with his work in this > > regard? That might be the way to go if you want to keep it original.. > > > > Gene
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2001 1:31 am
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
Thom
A TA/TB/TC handles quite OK #if it's in good condition#: if it's not in good
condition the steering is usually appalling!!
If you car steers badly something's worn out or mis-adjusted.
When I bought my first TC in the mid-60s, the steering was not very good. We
went on a touring holiday from London through Belgium, Germany, etc to
Italy: other than the autobahn, most roads we used were less good than those
in England at the time and the TC steering was correspondingly worse.
After that holiday, I bought a reconditioned box from a man wrecking a TC
(very common in those days), and fitted it. The handling was transformed:
that TC did another 80 000 miles and five more trips to Italy before I sold
it during a tempestuous affair with a Lotus Elan (well, two of them
actually, but that's another story).
With the good steering box the car was comfortably controllable up to its
maximum speed of some 90mph (with the assistance of raised compression, 1
1/2" carbs and a TA diff).
Now I know all about rose-tinted specs, but 10 000 TCs were made, and the BC
box was used in many other cars as well: there's no "steering control
problem" in the design, only in the fifty-odd years of wear since!
As others have pointed out, #everything# must be right, but I would think
that the box is the component most likely to be worn or maladjusted. I would
suggest that before fitting the mod kit you have the box bushed, check
bearings, end-float, wear on the cam, peg, sector shaft and so on.
Regards
Dave Dwyer
J2, TA, TC
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:42 pm
Fwd: [mg-tabc] 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
Would appreciate any feed back about the Pro and Con about the Datsun
conversion. Tally Ho! Thom Collins
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2001 1:00 am
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
"there's no "steering control problem" in the design, only in the fifty-odd years of wear since! " No? I beg to differ. Having the sector shaft rub on the top plate can never be good design. Even if it were not being forced against it by the shape of the peg it would still be unacceptable. Otherwise I agree that a good condition box (and geometry, maintenace etc - and don't foget the front springs) gives acceptable steering in keeping with the standards of the age. It does not bear comparison with modern sttering but that would detract from the charm, wouldn't it?
Ian T.
--------------------
talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the net at http://www.talk21.com
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 3:55 pm
Re: 1948 MG TC #6744- Steering Conversion
It should 'nip' the top plate. Any forcing, and
another shim is required.
DAI
--- i.thomson@talk21.com wrote: >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com> "there's no "steering control problem" in the > design, only in the fifty-odd years of wear since! " > No? I beg to differ. Having the sector shaft rub > on the top plate can never be good design. Even if > it were not being forced against it by the shape of > the peg it would still be unacceptable. Otherwise I > agree that a good condition box (and geometry, > maintenace etc - and don't foget the front springs) > gives acceptable steering in keeping with the > standards of the age. It does not bear comparison > with modern sttering but that would detract from the > charm, wouldn't it? > > Ian T.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests