some klr things for sale

DSN_KLR650
RM
Posts: 1977
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 7:20 pm

mileage

Post by RM » Fri Oct 05, 2001 9:41 am

--- Dan Davis wrote:
>1 - How many miles could I expect to get out of a KLR before a major >engine overhaul? Use would be mostly a 15 mile trip to and from work ~5 >days a week (interstate miles, ~ 70 mph), just a bit of offroad use, and >some touring mostly around Texas in terrain of varying type.
Realistically? Maybe 60k? It'll probably need a cam and a balancer chain before that, though. I think that there are a few around here with over 80k.
>2 - Whats a typical service interval for a KLR650? Most of the >streetbikes I've had required service every 5 - 6k miles, but I've never >owned a dual-sport before. 5-6k miles is about 6 months for me.
Depends on what you mean by "service interval". RM __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

Bogdan Swider
Posts: 2759
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 2:04 pm

mileage

Post by Bogdan Swider » Fri Oct 05, 2001 11:07 am

> about 6 months for me. > > Depends on what you mean by "service interval". > > RM >
That's about right for the married guys on the list. Bogdan

locker1325
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 6:13 pm

mileage

Post by locker1325 » Fri May 21, 2004 12:02 pm

Gentlemen, I have heard alot of talk on this discussion link about performance upgrades. What I am interested in finding out is the affect these mods have had on mileage. I would like to which mods you have done like the holes in the airbox,removal of baffle, rejets,turning out the idle screw,installing a custom exhaust like the big gun, installing a k&n or other aftermarket intake filter or any combination of these. I know that most people get around 50 mpg on a bone stock KLR. I am interested in doing some of these mods on my bike but am not sure if I am willing to have my mileage drop to 35 or so mpg. Any info would be greatly appreciated. Later. chris 2004 KLR

Devon
Posts: 933
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 7:13 pm

mileage

Post by Devon » Fri May 21, 2004 12:30 pm

ussford@... wrote:
>Gentlemen, > >I have heard alot of talk on this discussion link about performance >upgrades. What I am interested in finding out is the affect these >mods have had on mileage. I would like to which mods you have done >like the holes in the airbox,removal of baffle, rejets,turning out >the idle screw,installing a custom exhaust like the big gun, >installing a k&n or other aftermarket intake filter or any >combination of these. I know that most people get around 50 mpg on a >bone stock KLR. I am interested in doing some of these mods on my >bike but am not sure if I am willing to have my mileage drop to 35 or >so mpg. Any info would be greatly appreciated. Later. > >
I strongly suggest you spend time and money upgrading the brakes and suspension first. Unless the bike isn't running right, limit your carb mods to turning out the pilot screw another 1/2 turn or so, and doing the T-mod. Also, check the fuel level in the carb bowl before you do ANY changes to the carb. I realized that the carb I'm using (not the original on my bike) has the level set too low. I do a lot of urban commuting, and sort of technical offroading. Having smooth, easy, controllable power is MUCH more useful than having a little more peak power. I read an interesting thing in the race reports in the last Cycle World- The superbike classes were sometimes turning quicker lap times than the Formula eXtreme classes. In other words, bikes tunes for street use with less peak power could be flogged around a racetrack FASTER than a more-difficult-to-ride race-tuned bike. Devon

Keith Saltzer
Posts: 1071
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 10:03 pm

mileage

Post by Keith Saltzer » Fri May 21, 2004 10:36 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "locker1325" wrote:
> Gentlemen, > > I have heard alot of talk on this discussion link about performance > upgrades. What I am interested in finding out is the affect these > mods have had on mileage. I would like to which mods you have done > like the holes in the airbox,removal of baffle, rejets,turning out > the idle screw,installing a custom exhaust like the big gun, > installing a k&n or other aftermarket intake filter or any > combination of these. I know that most people get around 50 mpg on
a
> bone stock KLR. I am interested in doing some of these mods on my > bike but am not sure if I am willing to have my mileage drop to 35
or
> so mpg. Any info would be greatly appreciated. Later. > > chris > 2004 KLR
The stock KLR's that I have been around don't impress me as far as mpg goes. Most of them around here (Ca) are getting about 45mpg. When I was riding across the country with Jake a couple of weeks ago, his 02 (I think) bone stocker was getting much worse mpg than my fully worked 94. We were riding the same exact miles, roads, speeds, and I was consistantly putting in 1-1 1/2 gallons less fuel at each fuel stop. I checked mpg for both of us at one stop and it was about 56 for me and 45 for him. Now he is bigger than me and he had his pelican boxes out in the wind more than my load was, but we were only doing 63 mph at best. That's not enough for an 11 mpg difference imho. I strongly believe that the main problem with KLR's getting lower mpg after do this or that, or adding this or that, is that most folks just don't do it right. You can't just add a pipe and forget about it. You can't just go into the carb once, (without all the expensive engine tuning tools and computers) do something to it once, and then expect that you got it right the first time and there's nothing else that you can do. When I added the stuff to my bike, that was the EASY part. After that I spent alot of time writing down the exact main jet, needle clip position, fuel mix screw position, etc and then rode the bike around for up to a week. I would check for surging, coughing, sputtering, backfireing, stalling, hesitation, pinging, bad mpg while on the throttle, off the throttle, cruising, in every gear, just everything. That was alot of work. I would write down my findings, then talk to friends, bike mechanics and think about what made the most sense to change. Then I would change that one thing and try it out again. I must have gone back into the carb at least a dozen times or more. But in the end it was worth it, cause now I am very happy with my results and bike performance. I usually get around 50 mpg here in Ca with the oxygenated fuel that I have to buy. It will go down to about 48 when I'm riding hard for the whole tank, and it will go up to about 52 when I'm good. That's with the 'L' cutout in the airbox, screen cut out of it, K&N air filter, K&N jet kit with the slide drilled, fuel mix screw drilled and reset, and a Laser Pro Duro (race version) exhaust. When I went across the country and was buying better fuel, I was getting anywhere from 46 mpg (strong dead on head wind) to 52 mpg (nice tail wind). I was loaded with about 55 lbs of gear and was moving pretty good most of the time averaging 75 mph (80 indicated). When I got to Pa and got the bike unloaded I spent one Sunday afternoon just riding around the state like when I'm at home. After the trip meter showed 265 miles and I still had not switched to reserve, I pulled over to fuel thinking that I was pretty low. It only took a little over 4 gallons. I got 57.6 mpg. I was shocked! I continued to get 55 to 58 mpg while I was there. Later on when I was in Eagle Colorado, I had to baby my fried chain and sprockets over to Fred's place in Moab Utah for new one's. I didn't go over 62 mph the whole way and when I fueled in Moab with 255 miles on the trip meter the tank would only take 3.something gallons. What!! I knew something had to be wrong. I looked the bike over, shook the tank, sat the bike straight up............nope, I had just gotten 61.04 mpg with the bike LOADED, and I was up in elevation. Remember that I have the bike jetted for sea level. I sure wish I could get better gas in this state. MrMoose A8 (Barbie and Ken special)

Mike Torst
Posts: 1269
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:39 pm

mileage

Post by Mike Torst » Sat May 22, 2004 12:19 am

Take it from one of many - Do the front end and brake first. My KLR is modified big time - If starting out on my own funds? Suspension and front brake work, rear shock, and then the motor. OK, that did not work in moving your objectives? "L" cut the air box, get a higher flow air-filter, modify you stock exhaust, remove the pilot screw to 2+ turns out after you drill and pull the slug, and drill the slide vent to 1/8 inch ID. Figure about 5% decrease in mileage. Also figure better 3-8hp additional power. Check my photo/descriptor links if you are inclined - http://vegasklr.smugmug.com/ Mike Torst A16 Las Vegas, NV
> -----Original Message----- > From: locker1325 [mailto:ussford@...] > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:58 PM > To: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [DSN_klr650] mileage > > Gentlemen, > > I have heard alot of talk on this discussion link about performance > upgrades. What I am interested in finding out is the affect these > mods have had on mileage. I would like to which mods you have done > like the holes in the airbox,removal of baffle, rejets,turning out > the idle screw,installing a custom exhaust like the big gun, > installing a k&n or other aftermarket intake filter or any > combination of these. I know that most people get around 50 mpg on a > bone stock KLR. I am interested in doing some of these mods on my > bike but am not sure if I am willing to have my mileage drop to 35 or > so mpg. Any info would be greatly appreciated. Later. > > chris > 2004 KLR >

matteeanne@yahoo.com
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 am

mileage

Post by matteeanne@yahoo.com » Sun May 23, 2004 10:51 am

Actually the riders weight and areodynamics of the rig are 90% of the cause of increased gas consumtion. Realize that the difference between a 150lb person abd a 250lb person to a KLR is like a car, and a car pulling a trailer. And of course box style bags cause a huge amount of drag. This areodynamic drag can easily be felt on your KLR. Sit Prone, upright, with knees flaired. Now, without moving the throttle, hug the tank with your knees, place feet on rear pegs, and lay doen on the tank, behing the fairing. If you were doing 60mph, you should pick up speed to about 66-68 mph, just from the reduced drag. Aerodynamic changes (positive ones can improve milage, but most any card/exhaust etc changes cannot improve on the KLR's tried and true design. --- Keith Saltzer wrote:
> --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "locker1325" > wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > > > I have heard alot of talk on this discussion link > about performance > > upgrades. What I am interested in finding out is > the affect these > > mods have had on mileage. I would like to which > mods you have done > > like the holes in the airbox,removal of baffle, > rejets,turning out > > the idle screw,installing a custom exhaust like > the big gun, > > installing a k&n or other aftermarket intake > filter or any > > combination of these. I know that most people get > around 50 mpg on > a > > bone stock KLR. I am interested in doing some of > these mods on my > > bike but am not sure if I am willing to have my > mileage drop to 35 > or > > so mpg. Any info would be greatly appreciated. > Later. > > > > chris > > 2004 > KLR > > > The stock KLR's that I have been around don't > impress me as far as > mpg goes. Most of them around here (Ca) are getting > about 45mpg. > When I was riding across the country with Jake a > couple of weeks ago, > his 02 (I think) bone stocker was getting much worse > mpg than my > fully worked 94. We were riding the same exact > miles, roads, speeds, > and I was consistantly putting in 1-1 1/2 gallons > less fuel at each > fuel stop. I checked mpg for both of us at one stop > and it was about > 56 for me and 45 for him. Now he is bigger than me > and he had his > pelican boxes out in the wind more than my load was, > but we were only > doing 63 mph at best. That's not enough for an 11 > mpg difference > imho. > > I strongly believe that the main problem with KLR's > getting lower mpg > after do this or that, or adding this or that, is > that most folks > just don't do it right. You can't just add a pipe > and forget about > it. You can't just go into the carb once, (without > all the expensive > engine tuning tools and computers) do something to > it once, and then > expect that you got it right the first time and > there's nothing else > that you can do. > > When I added the stuff to my bike, that was the EASY > part. After > that I spent alot of time writing down the exact > main jet, needle > clip position, fuel mix screw position, etc and then > rode the bike > around for up to a week. I would check for surging, > coughing, > sputtering, backfireing, stalling, hesitation, > pinging, bad mpg while > on the throttle, off the throttle, cruising, in > every gear, just > everything. That was alot of work. I would write > down my findings, > then talk to friends, bike mechanics and think about > what made the > most sense to change. Then I would change that one > thing and try it > out again. I must have gone back into the carb at > least a dozen > times or more. But in the end it was worth it, > cause now I am very > happy with my results and bike performance. > > I usually get around 50 mpg here in Ca with the > oxygenated fuel that > I have to buy. It will go down to about 48 when I'm > riding hard for > the whole tank, and it will go up to about 52 when > I'm good. That's > with the 'L' cutout in the airbox, screen cut out of > it, K&N air > filter, K&N jet kit with the slide drilled, fuel mix > screw drilled > and reset, and a Laser Pro Duro (race version) > exhaust. > > When I went across the country and was buying better > fuel, I was > getting anywhere from 46 mpg (strong dead on head > wind) to 52 mpg > (nice tail wind). I was loaded with about 55 lbs of > gear and was > moving pretty good most of the time averaging 75 mph > (80 indicated). > When I got to Pa and got the bike unloaded I spent > one Sunday > afternoon just riding around the state like when I'm > at home. After > the trip meter showed 265 miles and I still had not > switched to > reserve, I pulled over to fuel thinking that I was > pretty low. It > only took a little over 4 gallons. I got 57.6 mpg. > I was shocked! > I continued to get 55 to 58 mpg while I was there. > Later on when I > was in Eagle Colorado, I had to baby my fried chain > and sprockets > over to Fred's place in Moab Utah for new one's. I > didn't go over 62 > mph the whole way and when I fueled in Moab with 255 > miles on the > trip meter the tank would only take 3.something > gallons. What!! I > knew something had to be wrong. I looked the bike > over, shook the > tank, sat the bike straight up............nope, I > had just gotten > 61.04 mpg with the bike LOADED, and I was up in > elevation. Remember > that I have the bike jetted for sea level. > > I sure wish I could get better gas in this state. > > MrMoose > A8 (Barbie and Ken special) > > > > > > > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at > www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris > Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > >
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer

transporterosicles
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:40 am

mileage

Post by transporterosicles » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:32 am

I've been commuting about 35 miles (each way) to work here in D.C. on my KLR for about two months now -- got fed up spending $14 a day on public transportation! I am getting about 61 mpg (stock gears, Continental TKC-80 tires) and I would be interested in learning what others are getting - thanks, David (Damascus, MD)

Richard Bessey
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:48 pm

mileage

Post by Richard Bessey » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:42 am

My mileage depends on what I am doing and how badly I keep on the throttle: Cruising down the highway with my high gearset on, keeping the RPM's between 3500 and 3800, I have seen 63 MPG, average is around 60 MPG Commuting back and forth to work (3 mile ride one way) in stop and go traffic with my wife on the back is normally 45-50 MPG Crusing around in the backwoods with lower gearing on is anywhere from 40-45 MPG Regards, Richard Bessey System Administrator Vivio Technologies transporterosicles wrote:
> > I've been commuting about 35 miles (each way) to work here in D.C. on > my KLR for about two months now -- got fed up spending $14 a day on > public transportation! I am getting about 61 mpg (stock gears, > Continental TKC-80 tires) and I would be interested in learning what > others are getting - thanks, David (Damascus, MD) > >

rockiedog2
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:43 pm

mileage

Post by rockiedog2 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:03 am

I checked mine last week. Doing 60 GPS mph with the stock gearset and lightly loaded on gently rolling land it got an even 50 mpg according to the gps, which has been checked against the I-State mile markers and is in dead agreement with them. I have noted as much as a 9% error in my odometer/speedometer vs. GPS depending on what front wheel and tire size/pressure I was running at the time. Joe --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "transporterosicles" wrote:
> > I've been commuting about 35 miles (each way) to work here in D.C. on > my KLR for about two months now -- got fed up spending $14 a day on > public transportation! I am getting about 61 mpg (stock gears, > Continental TKC-80 tires) and I would be interested in learning what > others are getting - thanks, David (Damascus, MD) >

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests