2007 and 2008 deals - which is better?

DSN_KLR650
Tengai Mark Van Horn
Posts: 1922
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 8:31 pm

rear suspension

Post by Tengai Mark Van Horn » Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:21 pm

At 8:10 PM +0000 1/6/08, Mike wrote:
>BTW, I met a guy that worked for Kawasaki for a while. He tested the >original rate linkage. It turned out to be a falling rate.....
Kawasaki's sales literature states: "The Uni-Trak rear suspension action is initially soft, but becomes much firmer near full compression to prevent bottoming." Mark [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

rockiedog2
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:43 pm

rear suspension

Post by rockiedog2 » Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:40 pm

Hmmm...well so far I am wondering does anybody know where to get a 400 or 450# 10 inch long straight rate spring? Thanks for the replies. If there is anymore advice out there please pass it along. So far it's a little conflicting... Joe 06KLR- Jackass 98 Valkyrie- Big Boy Joe --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Tengai Mark Van Horn wrote:
> > At 8:10 PM +0000 1/6/08, Mike wrote: > >BTW, I met a guy that worked for Kawasaki for a while. He tested
the
> >original rate linkage. It turned out to be a falling rate..... > > Kawasaki's sales literature states: > "The Uni-Trak rear suspension action is initially soft, but becomes > much firmer near full compression to prevent bottoming." > > Mark > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >

Tengai Mark Van Horn
Posts: 1922
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 8:31 pm

rear suspension

Post by Tengai Mark Van Horn » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:45 pm

At 8:40 PM +0000 1/6/08, rockiedog2 wrote:
>Hmmm...well so far I am wondering does anybody know where to get a >400 or 450# 10 inch long straight rate spring?
The longest these guys make is 9", which is an exact fit with no built-in preload (unlike the stock spring, which is 10"). I added a..35" spacer ('cuz that's what I had on hand) to my shock when I installed the 400lb spring from them. A .5" spacer may be better, but I'm OK with my shock. http://www.eshocks.com/hyp_ind.asp?SubCheck=25+IDQ2%2E&Free_Length=Q9&SubChar=Q> Mark

Jud Jones
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:52 pm

rear suspension

Post by Jud Jones » Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:53 pm

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "rockiedog2" wrote:
> > > Hmmm...well so far I am wondering does anybody know where to get a > 400 or 450# 10 inch long straight rate spring? > Thanks for the replies. If there is anymore advice out there please > pass it along. So far it's a little conflicting... >
You don't want a 10" spring. 9"x2.25" fits, works and isn't nearly as ornery as the stock spring, which is under a lot of preload.

John Kokola
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:46 pm

rear suspension

Post by John Kokola » Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:27 pm

BWAAAAAAAAAhaaaaaahaaaaaahahahaaahaaaaaaahahaaa *breathe* ... "prevent bottoming" ... Stop ... my stomach ... can't ... stop ... laughing ... --John Kokola Bwaaaaaaaaaahaaaaa ... Tengai Mark Van Horn wrote:
> At 8:10 PM +0000 1/6/08, Mike wrote: > >> BTW, I met a guy that worked for Kawasaki for a while. He tested the >> original rate linkage. It turned out to be a falling rate..... >> > > Kawasaki's sales literature states: > "The Uni-Trak rear suspension action is initially soft, but becomes > much firmer near full compression to prevent bottoming." > > Mar > >

Mike
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:45 pm

rear suspension

Post by Mike » Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:45 pm

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Tengai Mark Van Horn wrote:
> > At 8:10 PM +0000 1/6/08, Mike wrote: > >BTW, I met a guy that worked for Kawasaki for a while. He tested the > >original rate linkage. It turned out to be a falling rate..... > > Kawasaki's sales literature states: > "The Uni-Trak rear suspension action is initially soft, but becomes > much firmer near full compression to prevent bottoming." > > Mark > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
And we all know that makes it true, right? all the best, Mike

Mike
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:45 pm

rear suspension

Post by Mike » Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:14 pm

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Tengai Mark Van Horn wrote:
> > At 8:10 PM +0000 1/6/08, Mike wrote: > >BTW, I met a guy that worked for Kawasaki for a while. He tested the > >original rate linkage. It turned out to be a falling rate..... > > Kawasaki's sales literature states: > "The Uni-Trak rear suspension action is initially soft, but becomes > much firmer near full compression to prevent bottoming." > > Mark > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Mark, To be more clear, I know that's what it says. I also know that sales literature can be "misleading,", to say the least. The first Uni-trak from Kawasaki (it might not have been called that) that was advertised as being "rising rate" was not. A friend of mine here in SoCal tested it when he worked for Kawasaki. This gentleman is an engineer by trade, and I've found him to be completely accurate and truthful. He also has an extensive motorcycle racing background. Regarding progressive spring and the current linkage, assuming that it is a rising rate. How you I (or you, or anyone else) know if the rising rate is correct for my style of riding? Say I try a straight rate spring, and a progressive spring, and a few different sets of links, and after some experimenting I get something that works for me. Maybe it includes a progressive spring, maybe a set of links shorter than stock, maybe both. I know a few people that have done this, including me. I know some people are happy with each combination of the above parts, some using an aftermarket shock. I'm going to share what I know works for me and others. That's what it's all about - to me, anyway. If I'm only speculating, I'll state that. Mike

GMac999
Posts: 152
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 10:21 pm

rear suspension

Post by GMac999 » Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:23 pm

ROFLMAO Only for the 120lb Japanese Rider the bike suspension was built for. GregM -----Original Message----- From: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Kokola Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 6:27 PM To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Rear Suspension BWAAAAAAAAAhaaaaaahaaaaaahahahaaahaaaaaaahahaaa *breathe* ... "prevent bottoming" ... Stop ... my stomach ... can't ... stop ... laughing ... --John Kokola Bwaaaaaaaaaahaaaaa ... Tengai Mark Van Horn wrote:
> At 8:10 PM +0000 1/6/08, Mike wrote: > >> BTW, I met a guy that worked for Kawasaki for a while. He tested
the
>> original rate linkage. It turned out to be a falling rate..... >> > > Kawasaki's sales literature states: > "The Uni-Trak rear suspension action is initially soft, but becomes > much firmer near full compression to prevent bottoming." > > Mar > >
List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html Member Map at: http://www.frappr.com/dsnklr650 Yahoo! Groups Links ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Alan L Henderson
Posts: 712
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2000 9:10 am

rear suspension

Post by Alan L Henderson » Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:10 pm

I think that it needs to be said again that there is a difference between buying Progressive Brand springs and buying a progressively wound spring. There are straight rate springs, dual rate springs, progressive rate springs and probably something that I don't know about. Alan Henderson A13 Iowa and why do they call saber saws jig saws now? And what do they call jig saws if saber saws are called--------- rockiedog2 wrote:
> I think I already know the answer...

Ian Francisco
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 2:08 pm

rear suspension

Post by Ian Francisco » Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:16 am

At 1:06 AM +0000 1/6/08, rockiedog2 wrote:
>I think I already know the answer... >I am prepping for a 10000+ mile trip(all paved or gravel roads) .... >The question is can I get by on the stock rear suspension.. . or do I >have to spend 4 or >5 hundred on that Progressive stuff? Experienced advice here please.
Some guys have reported better performance from the stock shock by installing 1 in. RAISING links. Gives the shock more preload naturally without reducing total travel and more leverage against the load. Cheap too compared to the cost of an aftermarket shock. I don't think height will be a huge issue with all the weight you're talking about, unless you are vertically challenged. I'm 50 yrs. old, 180lbs. 5'9" with a 31in. inseam and can manage my A14 in stock form. I can get the balls of both feet down at once or flat-foot on either side without sliding off the saddle much. Remember that the correct total sag with rider and gear is three inches bringing the 36in. seat height down to 33in. I've been watching eBay for shocks. A while back a comany in the Victorville/Hesperia area was selling new take-offs (stock shock practically unused) for $115 or so. Should have grabbed one 'cause that was a bargain BIN price. KLR shocks on eBay are in demand. There's a used Larry whats-his-name Progressive rear shock on auction now but bidding fever will undoubtedly push the price beyond reason. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests