gdr ready
subframe bolt failure rate
I replaced the doohickey as a precautionary measure and now I'm
considering replacing the subframe mounting bolts, but my heart isn't in
it. Do they fail often or only under extreme duress? I only weight about
200lb but occasionally double that weight on short trips with a
passenger. I don't usually jump the bike higher than two feet off the
ground. Somebody please tell me that this is light duty and the bolts
should last forever.
Thanks, Mike A18
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.3/66 - Release Date: 8/8/2005
-
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2001 8:18 am
subframe bolt failure rate
You can just go the easy route and buy better bolts. I'm a lightweight
and don't do much two-up, but went with the Big Cee kit for peace of
mind when I'm in the back of beyond with a load of camping gear.
__Arden
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Silverstein"
wrote:
isn't in> I replaced the doohickey as a precautionary measure and now I'm > considering replacing the subframe mounting bolts, but my heart
about> it. Do they fail often or only under extreme duress? I only weight
8/8/2005> 200lb but occasionally double that weight on short trips with a > passenger. I don't usually jump the bike higher than two feet off the > ground. Somebody please tell me that this is light duty and the bolts > should last forever. > > Thanks, Mike A18 > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.3/66 - Release Date:
-
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:41 pm
subframe bolt failure rate
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Michael Silverstein wrote:
Uhm, no, that's not light duty. I've heard of people snapping their subframe bolts with much less of a load. However, a simple hi-grade bolt replacement should suffice, the 'drill all the way thru the frame' upgrade, in my opinion, is overkill. This is literally a case of removing four bolts and replacing them with better bolts, requiring no tools other than a socket set and a set of metric allen sockets. (A torque wrench is a good thing too).> I replaced the doohickey as a precautionary measure and now I'm > considering replacing the subframe mounting bolts, but my heart isn't in > it. Do they fail often or only under extreme duress? I only weight about > 200lb but occasionally double that weight on short trips with a > passenger. I don't usually jump the bike higher than two feet off the > ground. Somebody please tell me that this is light duty and the bolts > should last forever.
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2000 5:09 pm
subframe bolt failure rate
I'd replace them. There are stories of some who have had to zip tie /
wire the thing back together in the boonies because they failed. And
with you being 200 pounds plus passenger plus an occasional jump.
Criswell
On Tuesday, August 9, 2005, at 08:17 AM, Michael Silverstein wrote: > I replaced the doohickey as a precautionary measure and now I'm > considering replacing the subframe mounting bolts, but my heart isn't > in > it. Do they fail often or only under extreme duress? I only weight > about > 200lb but occasionally double that weight on short trips with a > passenger. I don't usually jump the bike higher than two feet off the > ground. Somebody please tell me that this is light duty and the bolts > should last forever. > > Thanks, Mike A18 > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.3/66 - Release Date: 8/8/2005 > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
subframe bolt failure rate
Thanks to all who replied. Replacing the bolts shouldn't be as time
consuming as drilling out the holes and sounds like it should be good
enough.
Mike A18
...........................
...........................> From: Ron Criswell [mailto:roncriswell@...] > > I'd replace them. There are stories of some who have had to zip tie / > wire the thing back together in the boonies because they failed. And > with you being 200 pounds plus passenger plus an occasional jump.
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.3/66 - Release Date: 8/8/2005> [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric L. Green > Uhm, no, that's not light duty. I've heard of people snapping their > subframe bolts with much less of a load. However, a simple > hi-grade bolt > replacement should suffice, the 'drill all the way thru the frame' > upgrade, in my opinion, is overkill. This is literally a case > of removing > four bolts and replacing them with better bolts, requiring no > tools other > than a socket set and a set of metric allen sockets. (A > torque wrench is a > good thing too). >
-
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 8:31 pm
subframe bolt failure rate
On an all-interstate hwy trip on my Tengai to Daytona from PA five
years ago, I had one bolt vibrate out and the other one sheered off.
The tension from the lower bolts and the carb boot are the only
things that kept my subframe from dropping onto the rear tire. I
managed to back out the sheered bolt and replaced all bolts with
grade 12.9 and blue Loctite.
On my other KLRs which see more duty, I have the BigCee 'drill
through the frame' kit.
Mark
At 11:17 AM -0400 8/9/05, Michael Silverstein wrote:
>I replaced the doohickey as a precautionary measure and now I'm >considering replacing the subframe mounting bolts, but my heart isn't in >it. Do they fail often or only under extreme duress? I only weight about >200lb but occasionally double that weight on short trips with a >passenger. I don't usually jump the bike higher than two feet off the >ground. Somebody please tell me that this is light duty and the bolts >should last forever.
subframe bolt failure rate
Replacing the sub-frame attaching bolts with higher-grade bolts does
help in that the higher-grade bolt is less likely to shear. The
problem is that it does not address the primary design flaw. With
the stock design, particularly on the upper bolts, the threaded part
on the main frame is flush with the edge where the sub-frame bolt
goes through. This means that the bending & shear forces at that
point act on the bolt at the reduced diameter of the tread area of
the bolt. Also since the bending force is acting at the root of the
thread it is concentrated over a smaller area & more likely to cause
fracturing. Kawasaki could have elevated this problem if they had
recessed the threaded part on the main frame & used bolts with a
short unthreaded shank that would have bridged this connection of the
main & sub-frame. In my opinion the best way to insure the problem
is fixed is to use the Big Cee or Dual Star kit in which you drill
the hole in the main frame completely through & run the plain shank
high grade bolt completely through. It may be 4 times as expensive &
be a little more work, but if your frame breaks in the middle of
nowhere it is worth it.
Pete Chester A16
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Silverstein"
wrote:
good> Thanks to all who replied. Replacing the bolts shouldn't be as time > consuming as drilling out the holes and sounds like it should be
tie /> enough. > > Mike A18 > > ........................... > > From: Ron Criswell [mailto:roncriswell@s...] > > > > I'd replace them. There are stories of some who have had to zip
And> > wire the thing back together in the boonies because they failed.
their> > with you being 200 pounds plus passenger plus an occasional jump. > ........................... > > [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric L. Green > > > Uhm, no, that's not light duty. I've heard of people snapping
frame'> > subframe bolts with much less of a load. However, a simple > > hi-grade bolt > > replacement should suffice, the 'drill all the way thru the
8/8/2005> > upgrade, in my opinion, is overkill. This is literally a case > > of removing > > four bolts and replacing them with better bolts, requiring no > > tools other > > than a socket set and a set of metric allen sockets. (A > > torque wrench is a > > good thing too). > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.3/66 - Release Date:
-
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 3:37 pm
subframe bolt failure rate
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Silverstein"
wrote:
Maybe pull them out and make sure they are not bent, reapply Red Loc-Tight and torque to spec. What it cost me I replaced them, since I was ordering other things from the Late Jake at the same time. The idea or drilling out the frame to put laonger bolts seems to me... ummm overkill, but replacing the bolts with better grade was a simple thing to do, one at a time and lots of red loctight... Dooden A15 Green Ape> I replaced the doohickey as a precautionary measure and now I'm > considering replacing the subframe mounting bolts, but my heart isn't in > it. Do they fail often or only under extreme duress? I only weight about > 200lb but occasionally double that weight on short trips with a > passenger. I don't usually jump the bike higher than two feet off the > ground. Somebody please tell me that this is light duty and the bolts > should last forever. > > Thanks, Mike A18
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 6:49 pm
subframe bolt failure rate
The subframe of the KLR has a weakness in attachment. The upper bolts are
the main prob. If they loosen at all the sub frame cuts them off to failure.
A field fix is very diffulcult. I've done 3 drill through upgrades. Using
the original threaded holes as a guide, drill on through to the other side.
If a 5/16 bolt is used, it'll be fine. There could still be a bolt failure,
with the frame drilled through a field fix is doable. Some use 3/8, or
metric equiv., I think thats a bit much. 5/16 gives a little more slack for
misalignment. Cost is about 6-9 bucks for a long bit and the bolt. Could use
a short bit from both sides. never tried that. Zac
-----Original Message-----
From: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Eric L. Green
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 8:42 AM
To: Michael Silverstein
Cc: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Subframe bolt failure rate
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Michael Silverstein wrote: > I replaced the doohickey as a precautionary measure and now I'm > considering replacing the subframe mounting bolts, but my heart isn't in > it. Do they fail often or only under extreme duress? I only weight about > 200lb but occasionally double that weight on short trips with a > passenger. I don't usually jump the bike higher than two feet off the > ground. Somebody please tell me that this is light duty and the bolts > should last forever. Uhm, no, that's not light duty. I've heard of people snapping their subframe bolts with much less of a load. However, a simple hi-grade bolt replacement should suffice, the 'drill all the way thru the frame' upgrade, in my opinion, is overkill. This is literally a case of removing four bolts and replacing them with better bolts, requiring no tools other than a socket set and a set of metric allen sockets. (A torque wrench is a good thing too). Archive Quicksearch at: http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html Yahoo! Groups Links
-
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:41 pm
subframe bolt failure rate
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Ramey wrote:
Two words: Red Loc-tite. Between the Loc-tite and the fact that I upgraded my bolts to top-grade bolts, I'm not worried. -E> The subframe of the KLR has a weakness in attachment. The upper bolts are > the main prob. If they loosen at all the sub frame cuts them off to failure.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests