klr storage bag

DSN_KLR650
dooden
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 3:37 pm

an open letter to kawasaki riders and kawasaki canada:

Post by dooden » Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:48 am

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Larry Zakreski wrote:
> > I've owned three KLR 650s, a 2000, a 2002, and a 2004, and have
snip
> > However, after my most recent experience with Kawasaki Canada and
with a dishonest and incompetent local Kawasaki authorised dealer, I will soon be switching brands. I will never again buy any Kawasaki snip
> > The dealer adamantly refused any responsibility, either for a bad
rebuild, or for incompetent servicing. I then called Kawasaki Canada who said they would check into this. Kawasaki Canada's customer service representative then called me back to tell me that there would be no warranty because " the KLR owner's manual clearly states that the rider should check the oil before every ride " something which I admitted I had not done.
> > BUT, why should I be held totally responsible for checking the oil
consumption or oil level after the bike was just rebuilt and serviced by a Kawasaki authorised dealer? Realistically, have you checked your oil level in the last 900 miles? Do you consider this a valid reason to refuse a warranty? Do you consider 1500 miles after a rebuild a legitimate life span? Or 2 litres of oil in 900 miles as legitimate oil consumption? When I took my 2000 KLR to Baja, riding HARD in the hot HOT weather, it used about 1/2 liter in 3,000 miles. Why shouldn't I expect my 2004 to do the same? snip
> SGShaftedme@y... >
Myself when I have an oil change away from me doing it, I always check the oil before starting the engine, just in case the oil was not rechecked after first start up since the level drops slightly after the system is re plumbed with oil, filter full ect. Most places I go do in fact start the engine after it says full on the stick and then recheck the level for this reason. On my bike, how could I not ask for something as simple as looking at a sightglass ? I mounted a small level on the rear rack, so I can just grab a bar and lean the bike till its level and look down. If the oil is just bearly under the top of the circle thats it. If so oil check complete. As for all the warr. remember the grass might just look greener over there. Dooden A15 Green Ape

Brad
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:14 am

an open letter to kawasaki riders and kawasaki canada:

Post by Brad » Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:01 am

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Dooden" wrote:
> --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Larry Zakreski > wrote: > > > > I've owned three KLR 650s, a 2000, a 2002, and a 2004, and have > > snip > > > > The dealer adamantly refused any responsibility, either for a bad > rebuild, or for incompetent servicing. I then called Kawasaki
Canada
> who said they would check into this. Kawasaki Canada's customer > service representative then called me back to tell me that there
would
> be no warranty because " the KLR owner's manual clearly states that > the rider should check the oil before every ride " something which
I
> admitted I had not done. > > > > BUT, why should I be held totally responsible for checking the
oil
> consumption or oil level after the bike was just rebuilt and
serviced
> by a Kawasaki authorised dealer? Realistically, have you checked
your
> oil level in the last 900 miles? Do you consider this a valid
reason
> to refuse a warranty? Do you consider 1500 miles after a rebuild a > legitimate life span? Or 2 litres of oil in 900 miles as legitimate > oil consumption? When I took my 2000 KLR to Baja, riding HARD in the > hot HOT weather, it used about 1/2 liter in 3,000 miles. Why > shouldn't I expect my 2004 to do the same? > > snip > > > SGShaftedme@y... > >
IMO - it is all the owners responsibility and Kawasaki has every reason to deny any warranty claim. A newly rebuilt engine and the owner fails to take the simplest measure required to ensure the engine has the required oil needed to operate, foolish at best. It is simple negligence, and trying to coerce Kawasaki into repairing this for free is just another just too typical case of a person or people trying to avoid the results of their actions. And place the reponsibility of their oversights or inactions or negligence off on another with deeper pockets. And I thought this is was limited to Americans. Brad Centralia

Darren Clark
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:10 pm

klr storage bag

Post by Darren Clark » Sun Jul 10, 2005 4:23 pm

Now if I only had access to your C: drive, I could see what you're talking about. Mike Jones wrote:
>Here are some photos. The original strap went across the top of the bag. If was removed and sewn to the bottom, so it would strap to the rack. > > > > > >file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Mike%20Jones/My%20Documents/Mike/Motorcycle%20Storage%20Bag.Jul05.do > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >Archive Quicksearch at: http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com >List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > >

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests