traffic lights nklr

[Randy Shultz]

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Eric L. Green" wrote:

> Save your breath, ideologues are never interested in facts, only in

their theories... --- What kind of a person jumps into a nice conversation with name calling and generalizations? What does talking about chain maintenance have to do with american politics? Give me a break. Be civil or keep your negative rants to yourself.

[Blake Sobiloff]

On 4/14/05, Randy Shultz wrote:

> I was simply saying that I would like to get the benefits of a > corrosion fighter, water displaser and even de-greaser, like a WD40, > with better lubrication than a "light" lubricator.

Agreed! I think you hit the nail on the head--its more important to keep the chain free of abrasive gunk than it is to keep it heavily lubricated. Especially on a vehicle that sees anything other than clean, paved roads. The ideal chain product would be one that is a "heavy" dry lubricant. I don't know how that can be achieved, though. If I did, I bet I could make some good money! -- Blake Sobiloff San Mateo, CA (USA)

[Chaz Cooper - Hotmail]

What is it you use???

----- Original Message ----- From: Randy Shultz To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:29 AM Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Chain and Sprocket Life?- WD40 I should have been more specific. Sufficient was a poor choice of words on my part. I should have said best. I use a product very much like WD40, but with better lubrication in my experience. I'm completely sold on the idea of not using something that cakes dirt, sand and other abrasives on the chain, and that, I suspect, is what allows us to get more life out of our chains. I posted that previously. I was simply saying that I would like to get the benefits of a corrosion fighter, water displaser and even de-greaser, like a WD40, with better lubrication than a "light" lubricator. Randy --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Bogdan Swider wrote: > > > > > I won't argue that, as it's a liquid. But, in terms of chain > > lubrication, is a light lubricant sufficient? I question that. > > > > There's theory and there's praxis. As I've posted ad nausea: First chain, > 19.5k miles with gear lube. Second chain 21k with only WD. Current chain, > 18k and still going strong also only WD. Seems it's sufficient. > > Bogdan Archive Quicksearch at: http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[dumbazz_650]

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Stuart Mumford" wrote:

> > -----Original Message----- > > From: "dumbazz_650" > > > > Yeah, that works well for me too. > > > > But it could be just my tin foil hat... > > Or the fact that I stood and read some latin scripts while swinging > > a dead chicken over my head. > > MarkB > > How'd you get to be part of the conclave? > > Cheers > CA Stu

Easy, just fronted me mate 100 pounds to help him buy his prissy tengai MarkB