grasshoppers
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:37 pm
exhaust pipes
Tired of the tweety sound 2004 Klr making I want to put new pipe on
but want a quite one that will meet spark arrestor requirment for
riding in the woods of wisconsin
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:49 pm
exhaust pipes
That groan you hear is the collective moan from the stock muffler
advocates. I'm running a Supertrapp IDS Quiet system with 9 plates,
and it isn't much louder, if at all, than stock. I've not had to
repack it, and its about 1/2 the weight of the stock muffler. My
only carb mod was to tweek the pilot screw out.
Eric Stevens
Mechancisburg, Pa
A7
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "sapper9906"
wrote:
on> > Tired of the tweety sound 2004 Klr making I want to put new pipe
> but want a quite one that will meet spark arrestor requirment for > riding in the woods of wisconsin
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 7:59 pm
exhaust pipes
In a message dated 3/7/2005 6:41:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
sapper9906@... writes:
Tired of the tweety sound 2004 Klr making I want to put new pipe on
but want a quite one that will meet spark arrestor requirment for
riding in the woods of wisconsin
I've just installed one of the new style FMF Q pipes and am pleased. It has
your spark arrestor, its maybe a decibel or so quieter than the IDS it
replaced - was running four plates on the IDS. Its a pricey pipe being it runs
$325.
Pat
G'ville, NV
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2000 9:10 am
exhaust pipes
Is this muffler one that needs to be repacked periodically? Alan Henderson A13 Iowa> > I've just installed one of the new style FMF Q pipes and am pleased. It has > your spark arrestor, its maybe a decibel or so quieter than the IDS it > replaced - was running four plates on the IDS. Its a pricey pipe being it runs > $325. > > Pat > G'ville, NV
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 7:59 pm
exhaust pipes
In a message dated 3/7/2005 8:22:28 PM Pacific Standard Time,
hortonhearsawho@... writes:
has> > I've just installed one of the new style FMF Q pipes and am pleased. It
runs> your spark arrestor, its maybe a decibel or so quieter than the IDS it > replaced - was running four plates on the IDS. Its a pricey pipe being it
Is this muffler one that needs to be repacked periodically? Like the IDS, the FMF needs periodic repacking. Pat G'ville, NV [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> $325. > > Pat > G'ville, NV
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2000 9:10 am
exhaust pipes
Nuts! Well keep us posted on how often it has to be repacked and how easy or hard it is to repack. Looks nice. Alan Henderson A13 Iowa> > > Like the IDS, the FMF needs periodic repacking. > > Pat > G'ville, NV >
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 7:59 pm
grasshoppers
In a message dated 3/8/2005 5:57:13 AM Pacific Standard Time,
roncriswell@... writes:
When at the Supercross in Dallas a couple of years ago, I was impressed
with the nonchalant way riders were pulling their tear - offs while in
the air going over the triple jump that was directly in front of me.
Sorta separates the wannabe's and the professionals.
Its one of those things that practice make a lot easier than it looks and
mid air in a jump is about the easiest spot to do it. If he is still on the
circuit, most racers have Bevo Forte, from Scott Goggles, mount there tear offs
(a little racing trivia). The goggles have a small knob at either end that
the tear offs snap over. At one end there is a loop about a couple of inches
across. You catch your finger inside the loop of the top tear off, yank and you
have a clean surface. For street helmets there are clips that fit onto
either side of the face shield that provides the posts to mount the tear offs.
For trail riders and cross country racers Scott goggles came up with the
idea of the Roll Off. Basically they mounted a couple of small film canisters on
either end of the goggles, with a roll of clear film. As it gets muddy, you
reach up, grab a little pull string and advance a fresh surface across your
goggles. They didn't work that well. All sorts of trail hazards could catch
the film and pull long lengths out. Get any water under the film and it tended
to stay until you wiped it dry, same for any dust that got under the film. I
tried living with it for a year or so before going back to tear offs.
Pat
G'ville, NV
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests