broke clutch cable / good fortune.

DSN_KLR650
Mike Peplinski
Posts: 782
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 8:55 pm

sloppy manufacture???

Post by Mike Peplinski » Fri Sep 03, 2004 10:40 am

In a current thread one of the readers refers to the KLR (my beloved KLR) as sloppy manufacturing" and I've seen other references to "cheap" and such. To which I say 1/ bullshit 2/ why aren't more of you up in arms. If you want to see shabby manufacturing methods, look at a Ducati. They may look good on the surface, but how about repairs? Doesn't honda and Yamaha (Suzuki too) have a service department to repair things that break through no fault of the rider? Don't they sell more of some parts than others due to quesionable design or manuyfacture? Every bike, ot every machine, for that matter, has a "doohickey" somewhere. The highly revered BMW, icon of longevity, has many many (many many) sore spot-trust me, I know. Shabby manufacture? I'll grant you there are a few gaps in places I would not expect them, but I've never seen a bike on the showroom floor that was absolutely perfect. Cheap design? From what I"ve read, right here on the list, the KLR is damn hear bullet proof. Some of you riders beat the living piss out of your bike and it comes back for more. Many of these KLR's go near 100,000 miles before wearing out. I Harleys did that-well I don't even know what would happen. You can go through 2 KLR's for the price of an F60, 3 if you opt for the GS. True, there may be a few corners that have been cut to save bucks but buys, thats mass manufacturing. How many opf you have bid on parts for automobiles. Luxury cars are built with the same "lowest bidder" practice as must about everything else in our world. I"m almost out of rant now so those of you who refer to the KLR as cheaply made or designed-sell it off to someone who appreciates it for what it is-one of the best "bang for the buck" motorcycles out there. Let me ask, if they raised the price a few hundred, put in a new design chain balance lever and made it so the mirrors didn't break off so easily, would you like it more? would you have a better bike? DONE _________________________________________________________________ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx

Eric L. Green
Posts: 837
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:41 pm

sloppy manufacture???

Post by Eric L. Green » Fri Sep 03, 2004 11:04 am

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Mike Peplinski wrote:
> In a current thread one of the readers refers to the KLR (my beloved KLR) as > sloppy manufacturing" and I've seen other references to "cheap" and such. To > which ``-+I say 1/ bullshit 2/ why aren't more of you up in arms.
Fine and dandy. Want to swap fairing brackets? You see, my fairing bracket was built with too much clearance between its mounting plates when it was welded together by busy Filipinos. So the handy dandy Filipino assembly workers, upon receiving this bracket, simply bent everything to the point where it could be secured to the bike, and voila! Nevermind that my fairing goes down the road cockeyed, with one side higher than the other, I'm sure you won't mind. So since the KLR is built with such high build quality, I'm sure you wont mind swapping fairing brackets with me, because surely it's just a peachy-keen deal :-). And let's take footpeg mounts. One of mine was happily pre-stripped by those smiling workers at the KLR factory for me, so that I didn't have to do it myself! What a bunch of helpful guys! And of course there's that odd weldment ("doohickey") for adjusting the tension on the balancer chain. Some of them fit the shaft well. Others are sloppy and break after the corners of the shaft hammer on them for a while (the dude from Eagle Mfg. suggests that 5% or more are so sloppy that they'll eventually break). And of course there's that odd weldment called a "gear shift lever"... While some parts of the KLR seem to be better assembled than others (KLR engines in particular seem relatively bullet-proof other than the balancer mechanism), there's just way too much of that kind of sloppiness. As for why we aren't up in arms: The bike costs $5,000. Not $8,000 like a BMW F-650, the closest competitor sold in America. $5,000. And many of us got it far cheaper used, you can get a 5 year old KLR for $2,000 in some places. So even though pieces are falling off left and right as you go down the road because Kawasaki wanted to save a few cents on thread locker and thus the helpful gnomes on the KLR assembly line don't use any, and the KLR has all the build quality of a 1970 Chevrolet Impala, we just grumble about it and cope with it, because unlike the Yugo (another vehicle famous for poor assembly quality), the KLR does generally work mechanically well. But darn, I wish my fairing wasn't cockeyed! -E

takes2serious
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 11:26 pm

sloppy manufacture???

Post by takes2serious » Fri Sep 03, 2004 11:06 am

I think you're mixing in a number of different concepts under "sloppy manufacture". Sloppy manufacturing isn't poor design. It isn't least cost parts sourcing. Sloppy manufacturing, to my mind anyway, is basically about assembly. On my A18, for instance, one of the tank mounting bolts was cross threaded and the threads in the frame (or subframe) were damaged. That may have happened during manufacturing, or it may have happened during dealer prep, I have no idea. Others have mentioned things like a poorly aligned cowl. These are the type of things that might fall under the heading of "sloppy manufacturing", if they actually occured during manufacturing. Who knows if they did? But if they did, then they are the type of things that wouldn't cost the manufacturer a penny more to do it right than it did to do it wrong. Other things, like slapping adequate grease on a bearing, don't add significant expense to a product like a motorcycle. You're not going to find a manufacturer with perfect assembly. And I absolutely love my KLR and I hold the manufacturer in very high esteem. And I very much appreciate that they seem to hold onto their winning designs, producing them for many years, holding prices down and delivering outstanding value. But, in my personal opinion, my new A18 was not the best assembled bike I ever saw. But it was also the least expensive (inflation adjusted) new bike I ever purchased. Outstanding value, and I'm very happy with it. And frankly, I';m just glad they're still making and selling them at all, as I suspect they are not a very high-profit margin product.

Bogdan Swider
Posts: 2759
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 2:04 pm

sloppy manufacture???

Post by Bogdan Swider » Fri Sep 03, 2004 11:29 am

when it was welded together by busy Filipinos. Filipinos ? I thought they were assembled in Thailand these days ? Bogdan, who ate in a Filipino restaurant in Chinatown NY and didn't like it but likes the old Ernest Tubb song Filipino baby.

russell_dixon@bd.com
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 5:56 pm

sloppy manufacture???

Post by russell_dixon@bd.com » Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:28 pm

Mike, I was a bit offended as well. I'm not loaded, but I could have bought other bikes. I chose the KLR because the range appealed to me. Not necessarily the price range, but the range of places I can go and the things I can do are self-imposed limitations and do not reflect the capability of the KLR. Basically, the KLR makes a statement that the owner is a person who does not like limited (paved) options. The owner is not given to the "image" of the Harley or the "mystique" of the BMW, but to the "earthy" practicality of the KLR. As for the mechanical "opportunities", it makes you closer to your bike when you turn the occasional wrench. Dollars-to-doughnuts that you would need a cattle-prod to get the majority of BMW/Harley owners to maintain their own bikes.... Bottom-line: If you got a lemon, sell it! but don't generalize and assume the entire product line is junk. There is too much evidence to the contrary. RD "Mike Peplinski" DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com mail.com> cc: (bcc: Russell Dixon/SUMT/BDX) Subject: [DSN_klr650] Sloppy Manufacture??? 09/03/2004 11:39 AM In a current thread one of the readers refers to the KLR (my beloved KLR) as sloppy manufacturing" and I've seen other references to "cheap" and such. To which I say 1/ bullshit 2/ why aren't more of you up in arms. If you want to see shabby manufacturing methods, look at a Ducati. They may look good on the surface, but how about repairs? Doesn't honda and Yamaha (Suzuki too) have a service department to repair things that break through no fault of the rider? Don't they sell more of some parts than others due to quesionable design or manuyfacture? Every bike, ot every machine, for that matter, has a "doohickey" somewhere. The highly revered BMW, icon of longevity, has many many (many many) sore spot-trust me, I know. Shabby manufacture? I'll grant you there are a few gaps in places I would not expect them, but I've never seen a bike on the showroom floor that was absolutely perfect. Cheap design? From what I"ve read, right here on the list, the KLR is damn hear bullet proof. Some of you riders beat the living piss out of your bike and it comes back for more. Many of these KLR's go near 100,000 miles before wearing out. I Harleys did that-well I don't even know what would happen. You can go through 2 KLR's for the price of an F60, 3 if you opt for the GS. True, there may be a few corners that have been cut to save bucks but buys, thats mass manufacturing. How many opf you have bid on parts for automobiles. Luxury cars are built with the same "lowest bidder" practice as must about everything else in our world. I"m almost out of rant now so those of you who refer to the KLR as cheaply made or designed-sell it off to someone who appreciates it for what it is-one of the best "bang for the buck" motorcycles out there. Let me ask, if they raised the price a few hundred, put in a new design chain balance lever and made it so the mirrors didn't break off so easily, would you like it more? would you have a better bike? DONE _________________________________________________________________ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . Yahoo! Groups Links ----------------------------------------- ******************************************************************* IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR RECIPIENTS IN THE U.S.A.: This message may constitute an advertisement of a BD group's products or services or a solicitation of interest in them. If this is such a message and you would like to opt out of receiving future advertisements or solicitations from this BD group, please forward this e-mail to optoutbygroup@.... ******************************************************************* This message (which includes any attachments) is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, use, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. ******************************************************************* Corporate Headquarters Mailing Address: BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) 1 Becton Drive Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417 U.S.A. *******************************************************************

Jim
Posts: 1560
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 11:15 am

broke clutch cable / good fortune.

Post by Jim » Fri Sep 03, 2004 1:12 pm

My brother had his KLR shift lever brake while shifting into second gear heading out his drive way. Timing is everything. --Jim A-15
> >I hopped of the bike and pushed her 12 feet to the patio. > >Relpaced the cable w/ the spare. > > >Talk about good fortune! > > I can go one better. > > My original clutch cable snapped in the garage with the engine off the > night BEFORE my cross-country trip started. I think I was squeezing
the
> clutch and staring off into space or something. SNAP! > > RM

Doug Herr
Posts: 727
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 8:02 pm

sloppy manufacture???

Post by Doug Herr » Fri Sep 03, 2004 1:16 pm

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 russell_dixon@... wrote:
> Bottom-line: If you got a lemon, sell it! but don't generalize and assume > the entire product line is junk. There is too much evidence to the > contrary.
I am pretty sure that nobody said that they were junk. They are built on rather old machinery if I understand correctly and they are clearly put together with less then total concentration and care. That does not mean that I would not get another one if mine died. I love these bikes; but I am honest with myself about the overall strengths and weaknesses. -- Doug Herr doug@...

Jim
Posts: 1560
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 11:15 am

sloppy manufacture???

Post by Jim » Fri Sep 03, 2004 1:41 pm

Preach'n to the choir here dude, no better bike for me fursure. Now no harm in a wish list one can dream after all.....lets see gear driven balancer for starters oh and a dual range sub transmission (10 gears) that would be great and don't say it can't be done, check out this Honda from the early '80s the CBH900C. http://www.100megsfree4.com/honda/h0900/custom.htm --Jim A-15
> which I say 1/ bullshit 2/ why aren't more of you up in arms.

Christopher
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:51 am

sloppy manufacture???

Post by Christopher » Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:01 pm

===ORIG MESS=== Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:03:10 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric L. Green" Fine and dandy. Want to swap fairing brackets? You see, my fairing bracket was built with too much clearance between its mounting plates when it was welded together by busy Filipinos. So the handy dandy Filipino assembly workers, upon receiving this bracket, simply bent everything to the [snip] And let's take footpeg mounts. One of mine was happily pre-stripped by those smiling workers at the KLR factory for me, so that I didn't have to [snip] ===END MESS=== Aren't these dealer prep issues? From what else I scanned in your rant, I concluded that you purchased new? Did you go back to the dealer on these issues? Why did you buy a bike with a crooked fairing, anyway? Chris __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo

rsanders30117
Posts: 469
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 11:06 am

sloppy manufacture???

Post by rsanders30117 » Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:31 pm

Mike, I don't think you are considering the unique characteristics (quirks?) of the typical KLR rider. The KLR riders that hang around this web site absolutely love tinkering on their machines and every dual sport ride I've been on, flocks of KLR eccentrics move from bike to bike to see what modifications have been done & to discuss future mods. What may sound like criticism of the KLR is justification for buying more parts, tools & tearing into it again. I've just about worn out the threads holding tail of the fuel tank down taking off (hummm, an application for a toggle clamp perhaps, certain helicoils). I haven't run across any other bike that has such a unique, friendly & helpful following. My A14 (the infamous Y2K version)isn't pretty but I've had a ball working on it & accessorizing it. --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Peplinski" wrote:
> In a current thread one of the readers refers to the KLR (my
beloved KLR) as
> sloppy manufacturing" and I've seen other references to "cheap" and
such. To
> which I say 1/ bullshit 2/ why aren't more of you up in arms. If
you want to
> see shabby manufacturing methods, look at a Ducati. They may look
good on
> the surface, but how about repairs? Doesn't honda and Yamaha
(Suzuki too)
> have a service department to repair things that break through no
fault of
> the rider? Don't they sell more of some parts than others due to
quesionable
> design or manuyfacture? Every bike, ot every machine, for that
matter, has a
> "doohickey" somewhere. The highly revered BMW, icon of longevity,
has many
> many (many many) sore spot-trust me, I know. Shabby manufacture?
I'll grant
> you there are a few gaps in places I would not expect them, but
I've never
> seen a bike on the showroom floor that was absolutely perfect.
Cheap design?
> From what I"ve read, right here on the list, the KLR is damn hear
bullet
> proof. Some of you riders beat the living piss out of your bike and
it comes
> back for more. Many of these KLR's go near 100,000 miles before
wearing out.
> I Harleys did that-well I don't even know what would happen. You
can go
> through 2 KLR's for the price of an F60, 3 if you opt for the GS.
True,
> there may be a few corners that have been cut to save bucks but
buys, thats
> mass manufacturing. How many opf you have bid on parts for
automobiles.
> Luxury cars are built with the same "lowest bidder" practice as
must about
> everything else in our world. I"m almost out of rant now so those
of you who
> refer to the KLR as cheaply made or designed-sell it off to someone
who
> appreciates it for what it is-one of the best "bang for the buck" > motorcycles out there. Let me ask, if they raised the price a few
hundred,
> put in a new design chain balance lever and made it so the mirrors
didn't
> break off so easily, would you like it more? would you have a
better bike?
> DONE > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the
Back to

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests