klr's for sale

DSN_KLR650
Post Reply
Skip Faulkner
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 9:08 am

nklr moab

Post by Skip Faulkner » Mon May 29, 2000 8:17 pm

We`re planning on leaving our place Thursday , leaving Missoula,MT. Friday A.M.. We`ll be going to Albuquerque,NM. first, but going right by Moab, so if anyone wants to hook up in Montana or Idaho, let me know. Skip

Skip Faulkner
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 9:08 am

nklr moab

Post by Skip Faulkner » Thu Jun 01, 2000 6:22 pm

We`re trying to head out tonight. Be safe everybody. Adios, Skip

D.J. Rogers
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu May 18, 2000 9:59 pm

nklr moab

Post by D.J. Rogers » Thu Jun 01, 2000 6:44 pm

You're breakin' my freakin' heart, Mark! At least you get to go! :) Me thinks it's gonna get awful quiet around here until everyone gets back from the rally. I was supposed to attend but have had to can it for this year due to work commitments. I'm going to slide down there in August for a couple of days and check out the area for next year. Have fun, everyone. Remember Tina's accident and wear your gear. Ride safe. Cheers, D. GBG eh14
--- In DSN_klr650@egroups.com, "Weaver, Mark" wrote: > all you guys that are leaving now suck! i have to wait until tuesday > afternoon to leave! waaaaaah! > mw > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Skip Faulkner [mailto:msfaul@d...] > > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:21 PM > > To: 'KLR List' > > Subject: [DSN_klr650] NKLR Moab > > > > > > We`re trying to head out tonight. Be safe everybody. > > > > Adios, > > Skip > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- > > Bids starting at $7 for thousands of products - uBid.com > > http://click.egroups.com/1/3027/5/_/911801/_/959901769/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- > > > > Visit the KLR650 archives at > > http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650 > > Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@s... > > Let's keep this list SPAM free! > > > > Visit our site at http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650 > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > >

Conall O'Brien
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2000 11:23 am

nklr moab

Post by Conall O'Brien » Thu Feb 27, 2003 5:16 pm

Fred, Was this your idea? "When and if the United States does go to war, military sources say the United States is preparing a monster new weapon to be used during the first nights. It's called MOAB, short for "massive ordinance air burst" bomb. It is a modern, bigger version of the 15,000-pound "Daisy Cutter" used in Vietnam, the Persian Gulf War and Afghanistan. Sources say MOAB is still experimental and is a 21,000-pound bomb that will be pushed out the back of a C-130 transport and guided by satellite. Because it is not dropped by parachute, as was the old Daisy Cutter, the aircraft can let it go from far higher altitudes, making it safer for U.S. pilots. The MOAB's massive explosive punch, sources say, is similar to a small nuclear weapon. It is intended to obliterate a command center hidden in tunnels and bunkers or a concentration of Iraqi tanks. Whatever the target, it must be far from cities where civilians might be hurt. But one important aspect of using this type of weapon, sources say, will be psychological impact on enemy troops. It is intended to terrorize Iraqi troops, drastically reducing their desire to continue the fight. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/newbomb030225.html _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

Fred Hink
Posts: 2434
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 10:08 am

nklr moab

Post by Fred Hink » Thu Feb 27, 2003 7:44 pm

No sorry, My idea for mass destruction is the ZON machine. So far my "Plan" seems to be working. Fred ;-) http://www.arrowheadmotorsports.com http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/cmc.html
----- Original Message ----- From: "Conall O'Brien" To: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com> Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:16 PM Subject: NKLR MOAB > Fred, > > Was this your idea? > > "When and if the United States does go to war, military sources say the > United States is preparing a monster new weapon to be used during the first > nights. > > It's called MOAB, short for "massive ordinance air burst" bomb. It is a > modern, bigger version of the 15,000-pound "Daisy Cutter" used in Vietnam, > the Persian Gulf War and Afghanistan. > > Sources say MOAB is still experimental and is a 21,000-pound bomb that will > be pushed out the back of a C-130 transport and guided by satellite. Because > it is not dropped by parachute, as was the old Daisy Cutter, the aircraft > can let it go from far higher altitudes, making it safer for U.S. pilots. > > The MOAB's massive explosive punch, sources say, is similar to a small > nuclear weapon. > > It is intended to obliterate a command center hidden in tunnels and bunkers > or a concentration of Iraqi tanks. > > Whatever the target, it must be far from cities where civilians might be > hurt. But one important aspect of using this type of weapon, sources say, > will be psychological impact on enemy troops. It is intended to terrorize > Iraqi troops, drastically reducing their desire to continue the fight. > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/newbomb030225.html

Russell Scott
Posts: 1083
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 6:16 pm

nklr moab

Post by Russell Scott » Thu Feb 27, 2003 8:34 pm

Weapon's Name Bombs in Utah City BY BRANDON GRIGGS ? 2003, THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE Folks in southeastern Utah are up in arms -- pun intended -- about an enormous new bomb the Pentagon reportedly will use in any U.S.-led war on Iraq. Its name? The MOAB. Military sources tell ABC News the experimental, 21,000-pound bomb, about the size of a car, is similar to a small nuclear weapon. Its nickname is an acronym for "massive ordnance air burst" and not a reference to Utah's mountain-biking magnet, but that doesn't make Dave Sakrison feel much better. "They could have picked a better name," grumbled the Moab mayor, who plans to e-mail Utah's congressional delegation to protest the missile's moniker. "Everyone I've talked to around town is pretty much appalled." Moab, considered more liberal than most of southern Utah, has held a handful of anti-war demonstrations in recent months. Some residents fear the bomb's negative connotations -- and worldwide opposition to an Iraq war -- could dampen tourism in a town that attracts many foreign visitors. Others just hate seeing their hometown associated with a weapon capable of such destruction. "This is not the way we want our town to be put on the map," said Grand County Councilwoman Joette Langianese. "I don't want to see on the news that the MOAB was dropped on Iraq and killed thousands of people." In its Tuesday evening newscast, ABC News reported the MOAB is a bigger and better version of the "Daisy Cutter," used by the U.S. military most recently in Afghanistan. That weapon also has a Utah connection: It was developed by former University of Utah professor Melvin Cook 30 years ago to clear landing zones for helicopters in Vietnam. The red-rock Utah town is the only community of any size named Moab in the country. It takes its name from the biblical kingdom southeast of the Dead Sea in what is now Jordan -- which, coincidentally, borders Iraq. No doubt Jordanians aren't too fond of the new bomb's name, either. Elected officials in Moab don't know whether it is too late to rename the bomb. Military acronyms tend to stick, although the Pentagon changed its response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks from Operation Infinite Justice to Operation Enduring Freedom after Muslim groups protested that infinite justice could be administered only by Allah. Not all Moab residents are fuming over their near-nuclear namesake, however. Adrien Taylor, editor of the weekly Moab Times Independent, believes townspeople are overreacting a little. "Getting upset about it is not going to change anything. I don't think anybody did this to give Moab a black eye," she said. "If there was a town called Scud, would they have changed the name of the Scud missile? I don't think so." -----Original Message----- From: Fred Hink [SMTP:moabmc@...] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:44 PM To: Conall O'Brien; DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com Subject: [DSN_klr650] Re: NKLR MOAB No sorry, My idea for mass destruction is the ZON machine. So far my "Plan" seems to be working. Fred ;-) http://www.arrowheadmotorsports.com http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/cmc.html
----- Original Message ----- From: "Conall O'Brien" To: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com> Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:16 PM Subject: NKLR MOAB > Fred, > > Was this your idea? > > "When and if the United States does go to war, military sources say the > United States is preparing a monster new weapon to be used during the first > nights. > > It's called MOAB, short for "massive ordinance air burst" bomb. It is a > modern, bigger version of the 15,000-pound "Daisy Cutter" used in Vietnam, > the Persian Gulf War and Afghanistan. > > Sources say MOAB is still experimental and is a 21,000-pound bomb that will > be pushed out the back of a C-130 transport and guided by satellite. Because > it is not dropped by parachute, as was the old Daisy Cutter, the aircraft > can let it go from far higher altitudes, making it safer for U.S. pilots. > > The MOAB's massive explosive punch, sources say, is similar to a small > nuclear weapon. > > It is intended to obliterate a command center hidden in tunnels and bunkers > or a concentration of Iraqi tanks. > > Whatever the target, it must be far from cities where civilians might be > hurt. But one important aspect of using this type of weapon, sources say, > will be psychological impact on enemy troops. It is intended to terrorize > Iraqi troops, drastically reducing their desire to continue the fight. > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/newbomb030225.html List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

The Mule
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 8:42 pm

nklr moab

Post by The Mule » Thu Feb 27, 2003 11:19 pm

Moab's already got enough problems with uranium tailings, doesn't it? Now they go and name a clusterf**k bomb after it. Maybe this is part of their "shock & awe" scenario planned for the first two days. Don't be surprised if there are other weapons unleashed like weather modification and/or electromagnetic scalar weapons. There's so much chit going on, on so many fronts these days, it boggles trying to keep up with it. What's the Buddhist saying?........."may you live in interesting times"? Da Mule ----- Original Message ----- From: "Conall O'Brien" > Fred, > > Was this your idea? > > "When and if the United States does go to war, military sources say the > United States is preparing a monster new weapon to be used during the first > nights. > > It's called MOAB, short for "massive ordinance air burst" bomb. It is a > modern, bigger version of the 15,000-pound "Daisy Cutter" used in Vietnam, > the Persian Gulf War and Afghanistan. > > Sources say MOAB is still experimental and is a 21,000-pound bomb that will > be pushed out the back of a C-130 transport and guided by satellite. Because > it is not dropped by parachute, as was the old Daisy Cutter, the aircraft > can let it go from far higher altitudes, making it safer for U.S. pilots. > > The MOAB's massive explosive punch, sources say, is similar to a small > nuclear weapon. > > It is intended to obliterate a command center hidden in tunnels and bunkers > or a concentration of Iraqi tanks. > > Whatever the target, it must be far from cities where civilians might be > hurt. But one important aspect of using this type of weapon, sources say, > will be psychological impact on enemy troops. It is intended to terrorize > Iraqi troops, drastically reducing their desire to continue the fight. > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/newbomb030225.html >