16 tooth front

[thack]

Thanks to everyone for the advice given as to whether to purchase a klr or a drz. We are going for the KLR's. I have a question, is there two versions of this bike? A fellow told me there is an A model and a C model. Can anyone help us out with this? Did he know what he was talking about? Another question, a dealer is offering me a 2001 (assuming new) KTM LC4 640 for $1500 more than a KLR. This bike is allready two years old, are they any good? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[trenthackinen]

Thanks to everyone for the advice given as to whether to purchase a klr or a drz. We are going for the KLR's. I have a question, is there two versions of this bike? A fellow told me there is an A model and a C model. Can anyone help us out with this? Did he know what he was talking about? Another question, a dealer is offering me a 2001 (assuming new) KTM LC4 640 for $1500 more than a KLR. This bike is allready two years old, are they any good?

[Judson D. Jones]

The LC4 is a splendid bike, very nicely made, lots of power, high-quality components, and miles of well-regulated suspension. The KTM is much more capable off-road than the KLR, lighter, but a lot taller and not nearly as comfortable, although the board-like seat doesn't seem to bother the guys I know who love to tour on their Adventures (7 gal. gas tank). The KTM is maintenance-intensive compared to the KLR; I have reports of up to 2 hours for an oil change. Some owners complain about the vibration, while others do not find it troublesome. If you want a high-performance dual-sport, $6500 is not a bad price for an LC4. If you want a bike that is versatile, easy to live with and to ride every day, stick with the KLR. I could easily add the LC4 or the DRZ to my stable, but neither one would reolace the KLR. --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "thack" wrote:

> > Another question, a dealer is offering me a 2001 (assuming

new) KTM LC4 640 for $1500 more than a KLR. This bike is allready two years old, are they any good?

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[guymanbro]

--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "Judson D. Jones " wrote:

> The KTM is maintenance-intensive compared to the KLR; I have > reports of up to 2 hours for an oil change.

That about sums it up. Valve adjustment every 3000 miles, KTM filters (two) for oil change will set you back about $30-$50 depending on where you are (you can get cheaper Hi-Flo filters) and don't you DARE break anything on the bike (shifter....$75, backordered for 2 months). But when it IS running...what a sweet machine! dat brooklyn bum (one KLR one KTM)

[Tony Cornett]

Bill I am running a 16t front and 39t rear I got from Sprockets Specialties. At 70mph indicated I turn under 4000 rpm. No Buzz. I use my bike Street Only. Good Luck TC

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kendoman" To: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: [DSN_klr650] 16 Tooth Front > Hello All, > I have a 2001 KLR 650. I am interested in putting a 16 tooth front sprocket > on to lower the revs a bit on the highway. Bike is used mostly for commuting > 50 miles per day. I was in my local Kawasaki dealer and thought I would > check on a 16 from him. He went to great lengths to explain to me that they > are not readily available and the bike has to be modified to use it. Hog > wash! > I don't believe a thing he said, but being a cautious guy, I thought I > would check. I have read of numerous bikes running 16 fronts on here with > apparent success. Is there any modification required to change to a 16? > > Thanks in advance, > Bill in Cypress, Texas > > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >