DSN_KLR650
-
n4hhe
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 12:41 pm
Post
by n4hhe » Thu Nov 14, 2002 12:41 pm
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., PhantomRider3@a... wrote:
> I learned a while back that the Snell helmet ratings that I valued so much
> were actually for car impact standards and not for motorcycle. If you have a
> Snell rated helmet it did pass more tests than a DOT but the testing was not
> designed around 2 wheeler type impacts.
>
> Head injuries from car racing are very different from mellon to pavement
moto
> related get off's.
>
> Feel free to correct me if you know different.
Why accept 3rd or 4th hand information?
http://www.smf.org/
http://www.smf.org/stds.html
http://www.smf.org/faqs.html
Snell does test with higher impact forces than DOT specifies.
A major difference between M2000 and SA2000 is that the SA
automottive competition spec addresses flamability.
-
Jake Jakeman
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 11:28 pm
Post
by Jake Jakeman » Thu Nov 14, 2002 7:30 pm
Flag to half-staff, cue the trumpeter. @ 10,912 miles, a sharp rock on the
road out to McCully's mine ended my Duro's misery. Wanted to see how far it
would really go. Probably could have gotten 500 more on pavement, but I
wanted to do good science for The List. Dave was with me on Thayne's '02: I
rode back to the shop and took the PW out to rescue mine. Next? A Kenda
K270 on rear; stay tuned.
Jake
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests