hey, bogdan pay more attention to nklr !
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2001 10:04 am
comments on the fuel grade poll results
Hello, everyone,
I am wandering why the majority of people who responded to the fuel grade poll on this list (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DSN_klr650/surveys?id=769099) have indicated that they are using the premium (high-octane) fuel on their KLRs? It seems that regular gas is both recommended and reportedly best for this bike. Why pay more for anti-knock additives when they are not needed?
Janek
KLR650 '00
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2001 11:09 pm
comments on the fuel grade poll results
I switch between 87 and 89 octane. I don't know why I just do it.
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "Jan Rebalski" wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > I am wandering why the majority of people who responded to the fuel grade poll on this list (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DSN_klr650/surveys?id=769099) have indicated that they are using the premium (high-octane) fuel on their KLRs? It seems that regular gas is both recommended and reportedly best for this bike. Why pay more for anti-knock additives when they are not needed? > > Janek > KLR650 '00 > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2000 8:06 am
comments on the fuel grade poll results
Janek,
Last summer mine knocked under heavy load while using 87 octane
regular. I started using premium and of course the knock went away.
Last tank I refilled with regular as an experiment and the knock was
there under heavy load and lower rpms, like less than 4000 rpm in 5th
gear. This last tank I refilled with 89 octane midgrade so I will see
if the knock is there later this week.
Anyway, I figure it costs me $3 more per 1000 miles to use premium.
Not to much I'd say, but if you are watching pennies it would add up
to something over time I suppose. Like $300 after 100,000 miles.
Brad
A9
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 6:28 pm
comments on the fuel grade poll results
Interesting question. The sample size of the survey isn't large enough to
tell us much though. Most of the respondents use the filet mignon of
gasoline and they're probably the one's most interested in gasoline matters.
I guess the premium users figure the price difference is negligible
considering the KLRs small tank bag and the relatively high MPG the bike
gets.
I've used the "discounted regular" for all 26k miles on my KLR with nary a
knock (and no tweet). If I started using the premium, there would be no
turning back to the hamburger though as the bike would surely start
knocking.
If you combine the "branded regular' and "discounted regular" votes, they
come pretty close to the "branded premium" votes.
Responses
Choices Votes 65 replies
Branded Regular Unleaded 9 13.85%
Branded Mid-Grade Unleaded 8 12.31%
Branded Premium Unleaded 33 50.77%
Discounted Regular Unleaded 10 15.38%
Discounted Mid-Grade Unleaded 3 4.62%
Discounted Premium Unleaded 2 3.08%
Darrel
A12 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DSN_klr650/surveys?id=769099) have indicated
that they are using the premium (high-octane) fuel on their KLRs? It seems
that regular gas is both recommended and reportedly best for this bike. Why
pay more for anti-knock additives when they are not needed?
Janek
KLR650 '00
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2001 12:18 pm
comments on the fuel grade poll results
Brad,
There is another way to look at the pennies: if you ride some 20,000
miles a year (as a typical self-respecting KLR owner does in a low-
milage year), then at $0.2 savings per gallon and at 48 miles/gal and
at $1.28/gal regular you are talking about a whopping $80 per year
going to other noble causes: for example, extra 3000 miles for the
money, a new rear tire, or a couple of oil changes. Wouldn't you like
to get a free tire for Xmas?
But seriously, if you *need* the octane, by all means do what's best
for your bike. I just thought that KLRs, as a rule at least, are
quite happy with the regular stuff, while, on the other hand, there
are lots of folks out there who believe that "premium" will give them
more horsepower or higher fuel efficiency or less emissions.
Janek

--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "Brad Davis" wrote: > Janek, > Last summer mine knocked under heavy load while using 87 octane > regular. I started using premium and of course the knock went away. > Last tank I refilled with regular as an experiment and the knock was > there under heavy load and lower rpms, like less than 4000 rpm in 5th > gear. This last tank I refilled with 89 octane midgrade so I will see > if the knock is there later this week. > > Anyway, I figure it costs me $3 more per 1000 miles to use premium. > Not to much I'd say, but if you are watching pennies it would add up > to something over time I suppose. Like $300 after 100,000 miles. > > Brad > A9
-
- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 7:20 pm
comments on the fuel grade poll results
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Janek wrote:
With 87 octane, my bike only detonates at about 70% throttle when under 4500rpm in hot and dry conditions. The cure? Open the throttle more and it goes away. I just saved my $80 this year! No, my bike has never been jetted. Yes, my bike probably has a jetting problem. No, I don't feel like taking the carb apart. RM>There is another way to look at the pennies: if you ride some 20,000 >miles a year (as a typical self-respecting KLR owner does in a low- >milage year), then at $0.2 savings per gallon and at 48 miles/gal and at >$1.28/gal regular you are talking about a whopping $80 per year going to >other noble causes: for example, extra 3000 miles for the money, a new >rear tire, or a couple of oil changes. Wouldn't you like to get a free >tire for Xmas?![]()
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2001 12:40 pm
comments on the fuel grade poll results
85 works for me (Colorado), although gas is currently so ridiculously cheap
(by world standards) that I might treat the KLR to a few tanks of 91 octane.
-----Original Message-----
From: RM [mailto:rm@...]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:30 AM
Cc: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSN_klr650] Re: Comments on the fuel grade poll results
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Janek wrote: >There is another way to look at the pennies: if you ride some 20,000 >miles a year (as a typical self-respecting KLR owner does in a low- >milage year), then at $0.2 savings per gallon and at 48 miles/gal and at >$1.28/gal regular you are talking about a whopping $80 per year going to >other noble causes: for example, extra 3000 miles for the money, a new >rear tire, or a couple of oil changes. Wouldn't you like to get a free >tire for Xmas?With 87 octane, my bike only detonates at about 70% throttle when under 4500rpm in hot and dry conditions. The cure? Open the throttle more and it goes away. I just saved my $80 this year! No, my bike has never been jetted. Yes, my bike probably has a jetting problem. No, I don't feel like taking the carb apart. RM http://www.dualsportnews.com Be part of the Adventure! Visit the KLR650 archives at http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650 Post message: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: DSN_klr650-subscribe@yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe: DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com List owner: DSN_klr650-owner@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2001 5:00 am
comments on the fuel grade poll results
depends on the riding I'm doing at the time to what I use. Going
down the hwy with 200+ miles to go = regular ; back roads where I at
lower speeds = plus ; in the forest at low rpm and lugging at times =
Hitest. Just so I don't hear pinging.
Cajun Country
Andy
-
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2000 9:19 pm
hey, bogdan pay more attention to nklr !
Man, you're spending waaaay to much time analizing and
not enough F_CKING OFF! Ooops, I think I just pissed a
bunch of guys off. NKLR NKLR NKLR NKLR NKLR NKLR NKLR
"Swede"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests