As a new owner of a secondhand machine (for 3 months) I've just had a look in
line with List instructions--just a few comments:
99 model (manufactured in 98), with some 3,500 miles on it now:
1. Inlets within spec. and even, but on the tight side. Exhausts on the bottom
of spec--a very tight 6 thou, but also even. (all suggests no real "wear")
2. Removing the top engine bracket allows you to swing the wiring harness out
of the way--its tight with the top cam chain guide tower!
3. I need to watch the exhaust and will wait for ,say, 3 more thousand to
monitor CHANGE (it didn't seem worth disturbing it all for a thou).
4. As the exhausts seem to tighten I wonder how they are set in the
factory?--It would appear (as inlets are close also, and exhausts are even)
that they are set at the bottom end, with wear expected--not the actual case
(valve seat recession/wear seems to be the main parameter, not lobe, shim or
cam bearing). As its an old, and potentially well developed/proven design, I'm
surprised that Kawa don't set them slack, particularly on the exhaust. I
wonder how many bikes out there get a proper check--is valve burn out
common?--mine had certainly not been apart at the scheduled 600 mile first
service--and with all the fiddle you can understand why. Additionally
changing/checking at 600 miles is probably too soon for the "lumps" to have
worn off , and for the engine to be thermally "exercised".
5. The valve cover bolts are shouldered--doing them up by hand is just about
all the gasket compression you are going to get. The 1/8 turn beyond "nipped"
is just to stop them backing off. (You are shearing threads in aluminium
rather than stretching the bolt).
I wonder how engine dynamics affect real clearance--bearing wear, oil film
etc---everything is "settled" during checking.
I also have to compare the 4 valve set up with automotive--direct acting cams
go on forever without the need for adjustment (pre hydraulic)--what is
different as its a relatively low reving engine?
I don't have a manual--is there a simple guide to cam position at the timing
mark i.e. obvious marks on the sprockets--I forgot to look--it was getting
late!
Not a 2 hour job--more like 3 to 4, particularly removing the old silicone
gasket with care. (but should be easier next time).
Regards, Chris Barnes
klr600--->650
-
- Posts: 1068
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2000 7:09 am
klr600--->650
guppies04@... wrote:
I don't know for sure, but I doubt it. It's not just a matter of putting the wheel in the swingarm, the rear caliper has to connect to the swingarm somehow, and you have to connect a master cylinder to the brake pedal somehow and attach the master cylinder and reservior to the frame somehow. I could be done if are good with tools like welders, but if you were then you probably wouldn't need to ask. Mister_T Melbourne Australia> Was wondering if anyone would know if the rear wheel is > interchangable between the 600 and 650? I have a line on a wrecked > 650 and woulkd love to add the rear disc brake to my trusty 600. Any > thouights appreciated.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests