> > Maybe it simulates a capacitive discharge ignition? A real CDI is > supposed to give you some power, but then again requires additional > electrical hookups, and ain't cheap. Like the Rev said, it could be a > capacitor, maybe with some extra parts, that changes the > profile of the > spark output. Slightly less total energy, due to component > losses, but > perhaps shorter and more intense in delivery. This would > also allow you > to burn through crap on the electrodes. So, you could get rid of that > spare plug!The recommended change to a non-resistor plug would > support this. Of course, you could also try a non-resistor > plug without > the Direct Hit and see if you get some middle ground performance. >
nklr direct hits and split fires and electrex
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 3:03 pm
[dsn_klr650] nklr direct hit
geez, just go to their website and read the technical data. it's appears to
be a peaking capacitor to give a shorter more powerful spark. i'm no
engineer, but i'm reasonably educated, and with a degree in math (proving
things), i can usually spot totally obvious b.s. i perused the website for a
few mins, and decided i should ask my brother (a mechanical engineer who
specializes in internal combustion and emissions issues) about how
installing a peaking capacitor directly over the spark plug would affect the
combustion process. i'll post to the group when i hear back from him.
the tech article by the Sandia Labs guys makes it sound like using the
non-resistor model spark plug is definitely going to give an improved spark
as well (which someone else mentioned earlier on this thread). i
accidentally bought a resistor plug a few months ago, but i'm ready to
change it out now. i'll probably do that tonight based on what i've read
today.
mw
p.s. while it's good to be skeptical about outrageous claims, it's also good
to read and understand what's going on before outright dismissing them. the
direct hits claims don't seem all that outrageous to me, and there may be
some science behind them (at first glance), so i'll withhold judgement until
i hear from a real expert, and the listers who've tried them can make a
longer term report.
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2000 12:20 pm
nklr direct hits and split fires and electrex
Articulated well! == Rev. Chuck :^)>+ A13 http://klr650.50megs.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _____________________________________________________________ Email Powered by Everyone.net>As previously noted in my long trip diatribes, I bought into the Electrex's >superior stator hype. I spoke with Electrex today and requested a refund. >No questions asked, just send it in. I think this is a reasonable response >although it doesn't lessen my hassle factor. It redeems them about as much >as I can reasonably expect and spares them from my venomous wrath. I think >they realize the power of the Internet.
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2000 5:31 am
[dsn_klr650] nklr direct hit
If we were still back at RPI, I'd
> have my advisor's combustion class put it on the research engine. It's > a small thumper, with instrumentation, adjustable compression ratio, and > I think some other adjustable parameters. Hooked right to a dyno. They > used this to test the "magnetic fuel enhancer," and found no effect. My > advisor gave a big explanation to the local evening news about why this > thing was all hoakum. Of course, the news gave the inventor about five > minutes of screen time to explain the device, and the only clip they > showed of my advisor was him saying, "It's pseudo-science." When asked > why our tests showed no power increase, the inventor said, "Well, they > have a carbeurated test engine, and they must have bought the unit for > injected engines." > > Also be leery of any product that tells you to tune up your car when you > install it. Don't know about the SplitFires, but putting new plugs in > your vehicle period will give you a boost. Anyway, let us know how the > Direct Hit holds up, Jim, and also if you get a chance to dyno it. If > Big Cee Engineering ever makes it to the big time, I'm going to just buy > another KLR and build a dyno, so I can test all of this crap on the > spot! > > Chris > http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/~stingray/klrsharkfin.html > > -- > Dr. J. Christopher Krok Project Engineer, Adaptive Wall Wind Tunnel > Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology > MS 205-45 Phone: 626.395.4794 > Pasadena, CA 91125 Fax: 626.449.2677 > > > Visit the KLR650 archives at > http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650 > Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@... > Let's keep this list SPAM free! > > Visit our site at http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com > >
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests