DSN_KLR650
-
Toby Lampson
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:36 am
Post
by Toby Lampson » Fri Jul 14, 2000 7:27 pm
Weaver, Mark wrote:
> if i lived in slc, i might consider showing up with a sign supporting
> reasonable public access to public land.
> mw
I hear you........Indeed, this initiative, was created from the Top to
trickle down.
No one does anything, and the mandate will come down.
In other words 'voting against this issue' is an action to support
the American process
When you look at maps of all existing USFS land
and see the wilderness areas already in them.......they cover about
half the total Forest area already!
In consideration of the Forest Service Employee Union position,
the needs of the various and diverse communities and local business
dependent on local Forest access..........in view of the Los Padres
Nat'l Forests Supervisor opinion, the importance of these areas to
all future Handicapped, elderly, and others that for whatever reason may
not be able to hike miles to get to back country........realising
that this is a 'one step' cure-all that indeed foresteps the 'local'
process for determining future forest management and therefore
has more detriment than positive impact........for 'ALL' the
diverse people and individual Forest needs...........and, because
there is a 'wilderness movement' already in place that has
'isolated immense public regions' over the past 30 years........
......I cannot suppport this initiative as part of the responsible
multiple use community, their friends and family.
Therefore, I oppose it..........
Tobin S. Lampson (Cal Posse)
-
JIM JAMES
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2000 7:24 pm
Post
by JIM JAMES » Fri Jul 14, 2000 8:40 pm
shucks. you shoulda taken a picture of it lowered. i been thinking about making a chopper out of mine and would have liked to have seen what it would look like. james in s.c.
> collapsed to a
seat height of about 2 feet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests