I'm with you that it would not be a substitute, and would be way
different, but with a little work, the little DL might be a pretty
good alternative. I'm thinking in sort of a modern TransAlp sort of
way -- smooth twin, long legs on the highway up to 80 or 90, middle-
weight adventure-tourer.
You're right, its belly is way too exposed. There's the front
exhaust, the oil cooler and filter, and the engine bottom. To really
adventure tour, it would need a skid plate and guards, maybe like the
nerf bars, but a little easier on the eye. There are already good
tire and luggage options. The power is good and the seat, fuel tank
and alternator are acceptable. It would need a little better
suspension, but that should be doable.
But if all of that could be put together at 430 pounds for under
$7,000 with TKC-80's, it might be pretty nice. You'd give up some on
the single-track, but gain a lot on the highway. It could be a nice
alternative to the big GS.
Jett, A15 AZ
--- In
DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "Arden Kysely"
wrote:
> Everyone loved the DL650, and with good reason--it's a great street
> bike, and tons of fun on smooth dirt roads. But it's no substitute
> for a KLR when the going gets rough--one good smack on that front
> header pipe and the fun's over for the day.
>
> __Arden
>
>
> --- In
DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "azman321"
wrote:
> > I've seen references before that the KLR would have to go at some
> > point cause it couldn't pass emissions tests, but I've never seen