#ygrps-yiv-81646885 blockquote.ygrps-yiv-81646885cite {margin-left:5px;margin-right:0px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:0px;border-left:1px solid #cccccc;} #ygrps-yiv-81646885 blockquote.ygrps-yiv-81646885cite2 {margin-left:5px;margin-right:0px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:0px;border-left:1px solid #cccccc;margin-top:3px;padding-top:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-81646885 .ygrps-yiv-81646885plain pre, #ygrps-yiv-81646885 .ygrps-yiv-81646885plain tt {font-family:monospace;font-size:100%;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-81646885 {font-family:Tahoma;font-size:12pt;} #ygrps-yiv-81646885 .ygrps-yiv-81646885plain pre, #ygrps-yiv-81646885 .ygrps-yiv-81646885plain tt {font-family:Tahoma;font-size:12pt;} A couple more thoughts regarding the KLR charging system: Someone mentioned the KLR "wire which isn't used" in reference to using an FH020 VRR. This is the Brown wire from the VRR to the switched side of the ignition switch as I mentioned in my "tome".

If one uses a VRR such as the FH020 which takes voltage reference from the output pin of the VRR (White wire on the KLR), the voltage will be lower at the headlight and other Brown circuit loads. Not a problem generally, and another reason to upgrade the White circuit or even better to install a power relay up front to power things so as to remove the load from the ignition switch and small KLR OEM wiring. Someone else...or maybe the same person, posted the use of a MOSFET VRR but wanted to caution that "MOSFET" simply means "Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor", and yes I did have to look it up as never remember more than Field Effect Transistor....in fact I have no idea whether there are other FET which aren't Metal Oxide.

Point is, and those posting likely know more than I do but simply didn't have time to post additional detail, buying a "MESFET" VRR doesn't guarantee that one is buying a series type VRR as many of us used to conclude. I recently bought a MOSFET unit off EBay which is a shunt type but appears (by the voltage drops) to be MOSFET. Just a caution in case someone has a problem from going down that path. Perhaps someone can check me on this as? The VRR will deliver a maximum current due to saturation (no one likely wants to wade through that explanation here so will simply call it saturation) in which the magnetism created by the current generated in the stator interferes with the rotor's magnetism and so limits the output current to the rated maximum. This is why alternators don't usually require current regulation/limiting control while conventional DC generators do. So, the maximum output from the KLR alternator won't be increased by improving the VRR, but, as the poster indicated, the KLR alternator's output can be increased at lower RPM by an improved VRR. In other words, the alternator may start charging a bit sooner and charge more at lower RPM with a better VRR. Not a huge increase but the difference between gaining a bit or losing a bit can be important. That, IMO, was the point being made when one expands it a bit. I haven't found an FH020 or VRR of the type which are supposed to be series type to have been shunt type but the sample size for replaced VRR has not been huge so they may be out there. Questioning has indicated that almost everyone swapping VRR simply does so on faith that they are installing the type expected. Has anyone tested and confirmed or found not to be the type claimed?