trails in ca.

DSN_KLR650
RM
Posts: 1977
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 7:20 pm

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by RM » Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:43 pm

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:51:36 EST, jokerloco9@... said:
> The regs are probably in response to bikes taking up space outside, > or people wanting an extra space outside for their bike, or because > they can't park their car or bike in the garage because they got a > bike(s) in there (or just a lot of personal junk).
Any other place I've lived, I'd agree with you. Here in this condo complex in Irvine, it's a little different. I almost never see anyone's garage full of junk. In fact, my roommate and I joke that everyone here has two hobbies: paying for their oppressive mortgage and buying clothes. There's no camping/diving/other hobby equipment anywhere in sight. Few motorcycles. No motorcycles outside.
> Whether you agree or not, the vast majority of motorcycles are > recreational vehicles. I suspect most of the people on the HOA board > are non-motorcyclists: nevertheless, most people would think the > larger bikes (perhaps over 1000cc) are more likely to be commuter > bikes (I suspect that is largely true) and the smaller bikes are more > recreational.
Today I learned that the [useless] patrol company is who suggested the 1000cc minimum and the HOA went along with it. We plan to attend the next board meeting and see if it's not too late to have the rules revised before they go into effect. I'm not too optimistic as California civil code requires a 30-day period from the time the rules are published to the time they go into effect. A revision at this point in time would probably reset the 30 days and I doubt they'd be willing to do that.
> The HOA probably believes that your bikes are recreational vehicles, > when you should only be parking your car in your garage or on common > areas. Perhaps you might want to go to a board meeting and find out. > Have you been to a board meeting?
We're renters. I'm not sure that we're permitted to attend the HOA meeting but we're going to try. Our landlord never attends. You'd think that a $500k investment that needs a minimum of encumbrances in order to successfully cash flow (if the rules limit your renter pool, it impacts your bottom line) would warrant some attention each month. I know I'd damn sure be at those meetings if I had so much skin in the game. Then again, she squeezed out her $200k in equity already so she probably couldn't care less if the place is rented. After all it'll be worth a million bucks in a few years and the Permanent Renter Class will be living in tent cities and Hondas. Right? (bullsh-coughcough). I think part of parking problem here is due to the lower owner occupancy rate due to everyone leveraging themselves to the moon and moving up the property ladder. The occupants here are getting younger and there are more people living in each unit (with more cars).
> Perhaps you might take a look at your personal situation. I assume > you have a garage, and I suspect the minimum garage size 1 car is 8' x > 18'. That is big enough for a car and a bike. My personal 2 car > garage has 1 race car on a trailer, 1 drag bike, and 4 full size > street bikes, and a full shop inside, with room to work. Perhaps you > could rearrange the garage to make everything fit.
Nope. It's a normal size two car garage with cabinets at the rear. We'd be looking at two Jeeps, the KLR, and a Serow. It might possibly be done if EVERYTHING but vehicles came out of there. This is not an option. Our living here is predicated on this condo being able to accommodate us just the way it is now and we've been fine for 1 1/2 years. We're fighting to keep this place as our home.
> By the way, I think living in any condo, or PUD is foolish for just > this type of B.S.
There's very little non-HOA housing in Orange County that isn't in a ghetto. In fact, there's very little non-HOA housing here period. RM

jokerloco9@aol.com
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:24 pm

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by jokerloco9@aol.com » Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:08 am

I have kind of noticed that people don't have hobbies anymore. Take a look at the average kid today. All they do is play video games, go to school, and maybe soccer. Constantly under the eyes of parents. The thirtysomethings go to work, and come home to TV and lattes. And maybe do a little traveling. Ask one of these college geniuses how to change a tire, and they say call Auto Club. Jeff A20 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Erik
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:14 pm

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by Erik » Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:43 am

> Ask one of these college geniuses how to change a tire, and they say call > Auto Club.
Though I agree with a lot of your point, Please don't generalize too much. Some of us have degrees, play video games, AND change our own tires. And doohickeys. erik

jokerloco9@aol.com
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:24 pm

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by jokerloco9@aol.com » Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:10 am

You must have a masters' degree..... Jeff A20 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Erik
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:14 pm

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by Erik » Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:14 am

> You must have a masters' degree..... > > Jeff A20
Nope, just a BS. Which is an at least 50% accurate name, but useful nonetheless. I can see why anyone that went further would get defenive about it, though ;) erik

Kerry Stottlemyer
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:45 am

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by Kerry Stottlemyer » Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:00 am

I've got a name for these guys C.E.M. College educated morons Kerry
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, jokerloco9@... wrote: > > I have kind of noticed that people don't have hobbies anymore. Take a look > at the average kid today. All they do is play video games, go to school, and > maybe soccer. Constantly under the eyes of parents. > > The thirtysomethings go to work, and come home to TV and lattes. And maybe > do a little traveling. > > Ask one of these college geniuses how to change a tire, and they say call > Auto Club. > > Jeff A20 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >

Samuel Hudson
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:46 pm

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by Samuel Hudson » Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:12 am

A buddy of mine had this old turd of a car, dodge shadow. He drove the hell out of it, it was old and he had let the inspection go out for like a month. The homeowners association sent him a letter with a picture of his "derelict vehicle" and asked him to remove it. that letter still has a place of honor on the fridge. --sam hudson, san antonio tx.

kestrelfal
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:31 am

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by kestrelfal » Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:53 am

Lose the "attitude" against those with more education and you'll be "smarter" and "wiser". Fred --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Kerry Stottlemyer" wrote:
> > I've got a name for these guys C.E.M. > College educated morons > Kerry > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, jokerloco9@ wrote: > > > > I have kind of noticed that people don't have hobbies anymore. > Take a look > > at the average kid today. All they do is play video games, go to > school, and > > maybe soccer. Constantly under the eyes of parents. > > > > The thirtysomethings go to work, and come home to TV and lattes. > And maybe > > do a little traveling. > > > > Ask one of these college geniuses how to change a tire, and they > say call > > Auto Club. > > > > Jeff A20 > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >

E.L. Green
Posts: 639
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 11:36 am

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by E.L. Green » Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:25 pm

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "RM" wrote:
> There's very little non-HOA housing in Orange County that isn't in a > ghetto. In fact, there's very little non-HOA housing here period.
I've noticed that every home built within the past 20 years that I've looked at, regardless of where, has an HOA. A bit of investigation found why. This appears to be part of a Federal mandate. Both the FHA and Fannie Mae require a properly-funded HOA if there are any "common" areas at all, which immediately means that all condo complexes are required by the Federal government to have an HOA (they don't say "you'll go to jail if you don't have one", but you can't get a loan to build or buy one). And the Clean Water Act, another federal mandate, requires that all housing developments of more than a certain size contain common areas in order to properly manage storm water. The effect is that HOA's are mandated by the federal government for all new developments. Just thought you'd like to know what your government is up to. No agenda involved, as far as I can figure. It's all just part of the general "mo gov'ment" push that seems to happen regardless of whether we have Tax and Spend Democrats or Borrow and Spend Republicans in charge... wish we had a Freedom and Liberty party that would say "enough", but hey, if you're a big corporate businessman buying politicians, why would you give bribes oops "campaign contributions" to someone who proposes taking LESS money from ordinary people and giving it to his business? Ain't happening as long as we have the best government that bribes can buy...

keithrstone
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:46 pm

nklr - homeowner's association problems - part 2

Post by keithrstone » Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:05 pm

And there are green common areas because zoning laws of our cities require them, and the developer won't take care of them forever, ... so they become the baby of the residents.
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "E.L. Green" wrote: > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "RM" wrote: > > There's very little non-HOA housing in Orange County that isn't in a > > ghetto. In fact, there's very little non-HOA housing here period. > > I've noticed that every home built within the past 20 years that I've > looked at, regardless of where, has an HOA. A bit of investigation > found why. This appears to be part of a Federal mandate. Both the FHA > and Fannie Mae require a properly-funded HOA if there are any "common" > areas at all, which immediately means that all condo complexes are > required by the Federal government to have an HOA (they don't say > "you'll go to jail if you don't have one", but you can't get a loan to > build or buy one). And the Clean Water Act, another federal mandate, > requires that all housing developments of more than a certain size > contain common areas in order to properly manage storm water. The > effect is that HOA's are mandated by the federal government for all > new developments. > > Just thought you'd like to know what your government is up to. No > agenda involved, as far as I can figure. It's all just part of the > general "mo gov'ment" push that seems to happen regardless of whether > we have Tax and Spend Democrats or Borrow and Spend Republicans in > charge... wish we had a Freedom and Liberty party that would say > "enough", but hey, if you're a big corporate businessman buying > politicians, why would you give bribes oops "campaign contributions" > to someone who proposes taking LESS money from ordinary people and > giving it to his business? Ain't happening as long as we have the best > government that bribes can buy... >

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests