nklr aerostich tank panniers

DSN_KLR650
samseitler
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:07 pm

klr life span

Post by samseitler » Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:07 pm

Purchased a new KLR 650 last year. 8,000 miles on it so far, wondering what the life span is on these bikes.

D Critchley
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 10:45 am

klr life span

Post by D Critchley » Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:25 pm

My 99 was bought in 00 with 2,812 km on it. It now has 80,300 km on it, and looks to be good for a lot more. In my case this is all road mileage. DC samseitler wrote:
> Purchased a new KLR 650 last year. 8,000 miles on it so far, wondering > what the life span is on these bikes. > > __._, > >
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Spike55
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 2:22 pm

klr life span

Post by Spike55 » Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:31 pm

As with anything, it all depends. I just saw a '89 in excellent condition with 9,000 miles but my '06 gas tank is smashed in and I only have 3200 miles. Routine maintenance is another wild card along with how hard you ride it and in what environmental conditions (wet, sand, or highway only, etc.). Don R100, A6F
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "samseitler" wrote: > > Purchased a new KLR 650 last year. 8,000 miles on it so far, wondering > what the life span is on these bikes. >

RM
Posts: 1977
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 7:20 pm

klr life span

Post by RM » Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:38 pm

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:04:36 -0000, "samseitler" said:
>Purchased a new KLR 650 last year. 8,000 miles on it so far, wondering >what the life span is on these bikes.
Anecdotally, the engine seems to be good for 60-80k miles before excessive oil consumption will ultimately sideline it. I seen reports of 80+k KLR's but I don't recall ever seeing 100k. RM

Don S
Posts: 425
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:27 pm

klr life span

Post by Don S » Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:51 pm

Excessive oil consumption does not necessarily mean the end of the useful life of the machine. Like any other engine, a rebuild would put it back in action. Providing the frame and major suspension components hold up, the bike should run a very long time with proper preventative maintenance. How long is any body's guess. I would say that if one is in their late forties to early fifties, chances are the bike will outlast their useful riding life. Stay healthy and enjoy every ride. Don RM wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:04:36 -0000, "samseitler" said:
>Purchased a new KLR 650 last year. 8,000 miles on it so far, wondering >what the life span is on these bikes.
Anecdotally, the engine seems to be good for 60-80k miles before excessive oil consumption will ultimately sideline it. I seen reports of 80+k KLR's but I don't recall ever seeing 100k. RM --------------------------------- Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RM
Posts: 1977
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 7:20 pm

klr life span

Post by RM » Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:15 pm

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:47:46 -0700 (PDT), "Don S" said:
> Excessive oil consumption does not necessarily mean the end of the > useful life of the machine. Like any other engine, a rebuild would > put it back in action. Providing the frame and major suspension > components hold up, the bike should run a very long time with proper > preventative maintenance. How long is any body's guess.
I agree totally. There are two problems with rebuilding a KLR engine, as far as I can see. The first is that the success rate is seems quite low. Probably three out of four come back onto the list complaining of excessive oil consumption after a top-end rebuild. I just don't know what so many rebuilders are doing wrong. Second, the cost of doing a proper rebuild is high. You can overhaul a Chevy small-block for less money. Many people are happy with their rebuilds, but after hearing of so many negative outcomes, I'm pessimistic enough to swear it off completely. When the time comes, I'll pick up a used KLR, put all the best components together, and part-out the remainder on eBay. A properly ridden KLR is going to be beat-up pretty good by the time the engine croaks. I'd rather start fresh and loot the farkle off the old bike. RM

Ronald Criswell
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:29 pm

klr life span

Post by Ronald Criswell » Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:27 pm

I have 42,000 on mine. I know a number with 50 - 60,000 and heard of one over 80,000 and one 117,000. Not bad for a cheap single? Criswell
On Oct 15, 2006, at 4:04 PM, samseitler wrote: > Purchased a new KLR 650 last year. 8,000 miles on it so far, wondering > what the life span is on these bikes. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Jeff Saline
Posts: 2246
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:02 pm

nklr aerostich tank panniers

Post by Jeff Saline » Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:23 pm

Listers, Just returned from 12 days on the road to find this as one of the most recent listings in the BMW Marketplace. Sounds like a good deal if someone wants tank panniers. Contact the seller, not me. I don't know anything more about this deal than what's in the add below. Best, Jeff Saline ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal Airheads Beemer Club www.airheads.org The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota 75 R90/6, 03 KLR650, 79 R100RT Category: Miscellaneous for sale Aerostich Tank Panniers Used 1 summer. (actually about 4 months). Black. Standard size. Bugs and road dirt included at no extra cost. See web link for info. Retail was $117--get these for $65 inc. shipping in the con-us. Price: $65 inc. shipping Location: Blue Ridge Parkway, NC See more at http://www.aerostich.com/catalog/US/Aerostich-Tank-Panniers-p-16412.html Contact Eddie James at Posted Sunday, October 15, 2006 at 13:02:56 (EDT)

kestrelfal
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:31 am

klr life span

Post by kestrelfal » Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:47 pm

10 years. F'd
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "samseitler" wrote: > > Purchased a new KLR 650 last year. 8,000 miles on it so far, wondering > what the life span is on these bikes. >

Norm Keller

klr life span

Post by Norm Keller » Sun Oct 15, 2006 9:04 pm

Ron wrote:
>one over 80,000 and one 117,000. Not bad for >a cheap single?
You want to know about a cheap single? My friend Ross .......... Norm [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests