[dsn_klr650] wobble

DSN_KLR650
Post Reply
Tom Myers
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2000 10:59 pm

[dsn_klr650] engineering type question/ nklr

Post by Tom Myers » Thu Sep 07, 2000 4:40 pm

> > >> Why do all/most dirt/dp bikes have larger OD front wheels than the >> rear. I know there has to be a good reason, but it escapes me. >> >=== (probably among other things) larger diameters roll over depressions >easier... and curbs, logs, small animals, etc.
Is it really larger? I think the tires are close to the same diameter. An equally pertinent question might be "why are they the same diameter"? Tom -- +---------------------------------------------+ | CycoActive Products | 701 34th Ave | Seattle, WA 98122 USA | | Design/Manufacture of Motorcycling Accessories | Products website: http://www.cycoactive.com/mc | e-mail: moto@... | tel (206) 323-2349 fax (206) 325-6016 | trail tips website: http://www.cycoactive.com/mc/trail_tips +---------------------------------------------+

JD
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 2:54 pm

[dsn_klr650] engineering type question/ nklr

Post by JD » Thu Sep 07, 2000 5:58 pm

Ok........So why not a 17" on the front as well as the rear? Most dp/dirt bikes have a 21" front and a 17" rear stock?? That would give you additional suspension travel in the front...no? JD
> > > >> Why do all/most dirt/dp bikes have larger OD front wheels than > the rear. I know there has to be a good reason, but it escapes me. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (probably among other things) larger diameters roll over > depressions easier... and curbs, logs, small animals, etc. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Is it really larger? I think the tires are close to the same > > diameter. An equally pertinent question might be "why are they the > > same diameter"? > > Tom > > A quick check says that the front is about 2 1/2" larger in dia. than > the rear. A fat tire on the front would make the steering too heavy.A > 21" on the rear would greatly limit the suspension travel. > Anyhoo, that's my take on it. TIFWYTIW > > Gary > > Visit the KLR650 archives at > http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650 > Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@... > Let's keep this list SPAM free! > > Visit our site at http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Tom Myers
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2000 10:59 pm

[dsn_klr650] engineering type question/ nklr

Post by Tom Myers » Thu Sep 07, 2000 6:11 pm

>Ok........So why not a 17" on the front as well as the rear? Most >dp/dirt bikes have a 21" front and a 17" rear stock?? That would give >you additional suspension travel in the front...no?
I think we'll see smaller wheels on new bikes fairly soon. Tom -- +---------------------------------------------+ | CycoActive Products | 701 34th Ave | Seattle, WA 98122 USA | | Design/Manufacture of Motorcycling Accessories | Products website: http://www.cycoactive.com/mc | e-mail: moto@... | tel (206) 323-2349 fax (206) 325-6016 | trail tips website: http://www.cycoactive.com/mc/trail_tips +---------------------------------------------+

Tumu Rock
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 10:15 am

[dsn_klr650] wobble

Post by Tumu Rock » Fri Sep 08, 2000 2:22 am

On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 08:04:23 EDT, Denzfeat@... wrote: > You also have to loosen the top set of triple-clamp bolts as you will be pulling the top triple clamp down onto the bearings. Pete the Streak Oops forgot about that...I loosened the bottom triple clamp though per the manual. That way, if you have the top flush, it stays that way. dat brooklyn bum _______________________________________________________ Say Bye to Slow Internet! http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests