the claimed dry weight is only about 10 lbs or so less, and i pretty much
only fill up my tank with the minimum required gas for off-roading because
it handles so much better. the more i think about it, the more i suspect
that speed is the biggest factor. his longer travel, better suspension is
going to allow him to carry more speed, especially when the loose hills are
punctuated by holes, ruts, rocks, waterbars, etc...
still, it's a fairly subtle difference for riders at our ability level
(novice). i think i'll see if he wants to switch bikes for a few minutes
next week, then i can try out my hypothesis. in the meantime, i'll take
heart that he suffered mightily on the freeway back down, while i was
relaxing and lounging with my windscreen, cushy seat and hiway pegs.
mw
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Walker [mailto:jlwalk@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 1:41 AM
> To: Klrlist (E-mail); Weaver, Mark
> Subject: Re: [DSN_klr650] fun with kenda k270s, tire questions
>
>
> > 5. some other unexplained thing. ideas??
> >
>
> Weight. The XR650L weighs less and thus doesn't require quite as much
> traction to make it up the hill. Actually, it might be a
> combination of
> everything, riding skills, suspension, tires, and weight.
>
> Jeff
>