[dsn_klr650] "nklr" motor oil debate

[Skip Faulkner]

 

----- Original Message ----- [b]From:[/b] msfaul@... [b]To:[/b] DSN_klr650@egroups.com [b]Sent:[/b] Thursday, May 11, 2000 1:22 AM [b]Subject:[/b] Re: [DSN_klr650] "nklr" Motor Oil Debate   > Just had to find out more about the SG vs. SJ debate.  It even > included oils for desiel CG-4.  So far the best info in one place > I've found yet.  >  > http://www.ibmwr.org/otech/oilreport.html > > Glen Meyer > Thanks Glen, I read this in the Fall but lost the address. For me this study made wasting money on moto-specific Mobil 1 a one time thing. I believe it also cured Kurt S. or his nasty diesel oil habit. Bogdan   Besides this " study" having some outdated data in it, much of their diesel oil data is either very old or completely erroneous. I posted how poorly documented and limited this thing was a year ago. Over the past two years, I`ve gotten reports and specs from four different oil manufacturing  engineers, several independent petroleum engineers, SAE reports and monos, not to mention my own oil analysis results, which all leave the afore mentioned "study" very suspect.       I do agree that  the extra expense of the cycle Mobil 1 is not warranted.   Skip