Speedometer - identifying original
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:56 pm
Is there a way to tell if this speedo is an original part or a repro?
Thanks!
http://www.lbcnuts.com/temp/tcspeedo.jpg
Wilsons Sandbox
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=278464
----- Original Message ----- From: "1939mgtb" 1939mgtb@comcast.net> To: "mavicator" websim@pacbell.net> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:17 PM Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Speedometer - identifying original > Is the back made of Bakelite, or pot metal? OE were Bakelite. > Best, > Ray > > "Much can be achieved with a smile. > However, much more can be achieved with a smile and a gun." > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mavicator" websim@pacbell.net> > To: mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:55 PM > Subject: [mg-tabc] Speedometer - identifying original > > > > Is there a way to tell if this speedo is an original part or a repro? > > Thanks! > > > > http://www.lbcnuts.com/temp/tcspeedo.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve S." websim@pacbell.net> To: mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:23 PM Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Speedometer - identifying original > The back is metal. Is that the only way to tell? If the face is so close > to the original that it they can't be told apart then I'll skip replacing it > with an (expensive!) original. Thanks so much! > > - Steve S > - TC8975, LA, CA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "1939mgtb" 1939mgtb@comcast.net> > To: "mavicator" websim@pacbell.net> > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:17 PM > Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Speedometer - identifying original > > > > Is the back made of Bakelite, or pot metal? OE were Bakelite. > > Best, > > Ray > > > > "Much can be achieved with a smile. > > However, much more can be achieved with a smile and a gun." > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "mavicator" websim@pacbell.net> > > To: mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:55 PM > > Subject: [mg-tabc] Speedometer - identifying original > > > > > > > Is there a way to tell if this speedo is an original part or a repro? > > > Thanks! > > > > > > http://www.lbcnuts.com/temp/tcspeedo.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]>Is there a way to tell if this speedo is an original part or a repro? > Thanks! > >http://www.lbcnuts.com/temp/tcspeedo.jpg > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > >
--- In mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com, "Paroor" wrote: > Dear Mr.xxx, > This speedo is a TD one (?) with a TC dial. This two screws on > the face discloses that. > Madhu
----- Original Message ----- From: "mavicator" websim@pacbell.net> To: mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:43 PM Subject: [mg-tabc] Re: Speedometer - identifying original > Thank you Mr. M! For that interesting and informative response I > shall endevour to not forget to sign my posts.> > I looked up the TD gauges and it does appear the holes and odometers > are a match. The needle does not match either one but is very similar > if not identical to older Jaguar gauges. Or perhaps it's a generic > replacement part? The only anomoly left is the painted clock. A TD > gauge would have had a clock so why go with an aftermarket face with a > painted one? I'm guessing that both gauge faces are repros. > > I believe these gauges were replaced about 10 years ago, perhaps more. > Is it possible that Moss was making TC replacement gauges from TD > units before they began making full replacement TC ones? That would > certainly explain the faces. > > Thanks for all the info! > > - Steve S aka Mr.xxx > - TC8975, LA, CA > > > --- In mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com, "Paroor" wrote: > > Dear Mr.xxx, > > This speedo is a TD one (?) with a TC dial. This two > screws on > > the face discloses that. > > Madhu > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jennifer and Hugh Pite" jenntoo@shaw.ca> To: "mavicator" websim@pacbell.net>; mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] Re: Speedometer - identifying original > Steve, the MOSS replacement gauges are essentially Triumph TR2/3 gauges with > a repro flat face attached. These Smiths gauges have no place to mount a > clock hence the painted, fixed time "clock". It is very unlikely that > anyone is making a TC chronometric speedo or tach. > The back of later TD gauges to not look even remotely like the ones in > your car. Besides that, it seems unlikely that anyone would use TD Jaeger > gauges to make a repro TC gauge since the former have been in short supply > for several decades. > Best Regards, Hugh Pite > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mavicator" websim@pacbell.net> > To: mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:43 PM > Subject: [mg-tabc] Re: Speedometer - identifying original > > > > Thank you Mr. M! For that interesting and informative response I > > shall endevour to not forget to sign my posts.> > > > I looked up the TD gauges and it does appear the holes and odometers > > are a match. The needle does not match either one but is very similar > > if not identical to older Jaguar gauges. Or perhaps it's a generic > > replacement part? The only anomoly left is the painted clock. A TD > > gauge would have had a clock so why go with an aftermarket face with a > > painted one? I'm guessing that both gauge faces are repros. > > > > I believe these gauges were replaced about 10 years ago, perhaps more. > > Is it possible that Moss was making TC replacement gauges from TD > > units before they began making full replacement TC ones? That would > > certainly explain the faces. > > > > Thanks for all the info! > > > > - Steve S aka Mr.xxx > > - TC8975, LA, CA > > > > > > --- In mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com, "Paroor" wrote: > > > Dear Mr.xxx, > > > This speedo is a TD one (?) with a TC dial. This two > > screws on > > > the face discloses that. > > > Madhu