Page 1 of 2
long way round
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:09 am
by Andy
Hi,
Just in case anyone hasn't seen this I thought I'd post the link.
It's not KLR related but it really is worth watching the DVD's just
for the endurance.
Ewan McGregor (Start wars III) and Charlie Boorman (his friend)
travel 20,000 miles (London to New York, the Long Way Round) on a
couple of GS's.
It's just a shame there are no KLR's in it !
http://www.longwayround.com/lwr.htm
Andy
C8
long way round
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:41 pm
by kdxkawboy@aol.com
In a message dated 1/31/2005 7:14:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
andy.rabbetts@... writes:
Ewan McGregor (Start wars III) and Charlie Boorman (his friend)
travel 20,000 miles (London to New York, the Long Way Round) on a
couple of GS's.
It's just a shame there are no KLR's in it !
And its just a shame that while they try to pass this off as real adventure,
it was really nothing more than a catered cruise.
Pat
G'ville, NV
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:05 am
by pete88chester
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, kdxkawboy@a... wrote:
> And its just a shame that while they try to pass this off as real
adventure,
> it was really nothing more than a catered cruise.
>
> Pat G'ville, NV
I disagree with you on this. It is true that they had a lot going
for them, like money, chase vehicles to carry supplies & spares,
there position as movie stares to help get things done at boarder
crossings, etc. It was stated at the beginning that the two chase
vehicles would only meet them at certain boarder crossing, cities,
etc., but Ewan & Charley & Claudio (the camera man) would be covering
the whole distance & doing all the ridding themselves. If you have
some proof that they didn't, bring it out. From what I saw they did
some damned hard ridding & went through some real brutal stuff. It
was a real adventure ride, I bet more than 90 percent of the people
on this list has ever done or probable ever will do. I personally
enjoyed the show, it gave you a good idea what an adventure
motorcyclist encounters. Sure they received a lot of help, but
without all the coordination & help a trip like this (with all the
side trips, etc.) probable wouldn't have been completed in 4 months.
Pete Chester A16
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:38 am
by kdxkawboy@aol.com
In a message dated 1/31/2005 11:06:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
ppchester@... writes:
It is true that they had a lot going
for them, like money, chase vehicles to carry supplies & spares,
there position as movie stares to help get things done at boarder
crossings, etc. It was stated at the beginning that the two chase
vehicles would only meet them at certain boarder crossing, cities,
etc., but Ewan & Charley & Claudio (the camera man) would be covering
the whole distance & doing all the ridding themselves
Sounds just like a catered cruise to me. Doing the day in and day out
riding isn't what makes the trip hard, its the prep work and being left to your
own wits and skills to get through the troubles. It was the outfitters that did
the real work that made the trip possible. Its the old school approach.
Pat
G'ville, NV
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:44 am
by Tengai Mark Van Horn
At 10:40 PM -0500 1/31/05, kdxkawboy@... wrote:
>
>>In a message dated 1/31/2005 7:14:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>>andy.rabbetts@... writes:
>>Ewan McGregor (Start wars III) and Charlie Boorman (his friend)
>>travel 20,000 miles (London to New York, the Long Way Round) on a
>>couple of GS's.
>>It's just a shame there are no KLR's in it !
>
>
>And its just a shame that while they try to pass this off as real adventure,
>it was really nothing more than a catered cruise.
Thanks, you're the first person I've seen with the balls to say that.
I especially love the statement on their website indicating that they
took "hostile environment training" with the SAS and also learned how
to light a fire by rubbing sticks together.
Mark
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:53 am
by a14@att.net
Ah, you're just sore because they passed up NOAB to visit OCC.
Walt
> >And its just a shame that while they try to pass this off as real adventure,
> >it was really nothing more than a catered cruise.
>
> Thanks, you're the first person I've seen with the balls to say that.
> I especially love the statement on their website indicating that they
> took "hostile environment training" with the SAS and also learned how
> to light a fire by rubbing sticks together.
>
> Mark
>
>
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:19 pm
by anti-js
on 2/1/05 9:44 AM, Tengai Mark Van Horn at tengai650@... wrote:
>
> At 10:40 PM -0500 1/31/05, kdxkawboy@... wrote:
>>
>>> In a message dated 1/31/2005 7:14:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>>> andy.rabbetts@... writes:
>>> Ewan McGregor (Start wars III) and Charlie Boorman (his friend)
>>> travel 20,000 miles (London to New York, the Long Way Round) on a
>>> couple of GS's.
>>> It's just a shame there are no KLR's in it !
>>
>>
>> And its just a shame that while they try to pass this off as real adventure,
>> it was really nothing more than a catered cruise.
>
> Thanks, you're the first person I've seen with the balls to say that.
> I especially love the statement on their website indicating that they
> took "hostile environment training" with the SAS and also learned how
> to light a fire by rubbing sticks together.
> Mark
The problem I had with LWR was less about the 'journey' and how it was done,
and all about the editing and presentation. Way too much 'bullshit' coverage
of all the ancillary niggly shit. Way too much sniveling into their
'personal' vidiography devices.
Passed over the whole of Western Europe with little or nothing to show,
rather, one epsiode was spent on the 'prep' of which the worthwhile content
could have been distilled into 12 min.
Final episode flashed over all of NA and used most of that airtime as
bullshitin with the assholes at the chopper shop in Orange County, NY.
The episodes in Asia were hinting of some good 'adventure' and aside from
,again, the petty individual 'broken nails' clips from each, those regions
can't do anything but astound when presented even some glimpses of it.
It all seemed toooo fragmented, with little real portrayal of the vastness
of where they went thru.
In all, the shitty-est piece of editing I've seen in a 'long way round'.
Otherwise it wuz good...
Js
Oh, the training side, even the prepping for possible banditos, prolly a
good idea for anyone 'touristing' anywhere in the former USSR...
As for the 'cast' and 'crew' of thousands - if you really want to 'film' a
good adventure and get really good footage, you need the full film and
support team. Still having just the 'cameraman' rider with the 2 stooges,
shows how minimalist you can go and still get some decent stuff.
As for the success of the 'support' and 'film' team in the buggies -
failure, utter and total.
If one thinks that having 'support' around lessens the riding adventure
greatly, then Dakar must be a real 'coffee klatch', cause we're talkin
helicopters for the spectacular filming and support that made the
'presentation' of past years so special for us mortals.
OLN, this year, a C+ for effort generally, and 'F' for the truck coverage -
they need to lose the 'Khaki' Queen and his XXX sidekick and bring back
Toby.
Most Spectacular Dakar seen on broadcast - my vote? - the one that went thru
Northern Africa and ended in Sharm El Sheik - 2003, I think. I wuz glued to
the toob during broadcasts.
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:53 pm
by George Basinet
Hey, it was FREE!!
George
Escondido, CA
>
>
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 2:17 pm
by pete88chester
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, kdxkawboy@a... wrote:
>
> Sounds just like a catered cruise to me. Doing the day in and day
out
> riding isn't what makes the trip hard, its the prep work and being
left to your
> own wits and skills to get through the troubles. It was the
outfitters that did
> the real work that made the trip possible. Its the old school
approach.
>
> Pat
> G'ville, NV
>
You are way off on this again. I think you are just trying to
promote the idea that these are a couple of rich boys playing a roll
without actually walking the walk. First of all if you watched the
show you would have seen that they were involved with the
preparation. That included getting the bikes, picking the routes,
stuff they were going to bring, everything. Sure there was a lot of
help, but remember this thing was being filmed for TV on a schedule,
so it needed an organization behind it. As for the prep being the
hard part, that is crap, especially on a trip like this one through
the miserable conditions they rode. Prep is important of course; if
done wrong it can make the actual ridding part of the trip a real
problem. As for using their own wits to solve problems, I think they
did a lot of that. There's no doubt that their celebrity status
helped them at say boarder crossings, things were done to expedite
it. That said I feel these two guys are sharp enough to have handled
it on their own, it would probable take longer, but they would have
gotten it done. So in conclusion unless some one can show that they
didn't actually do the ride & were flown from point to point to do
takes like on a movie set, I give them a lot of respect.
Pete Chester A16
long way round
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:05 pm
by kdxkawboy@aol.com
In a message dated 2/1/2005 10:09:21 AM Pacific Standard Time,
tengai650@... writes:
Thanks, you're the first person I've seen with the balls to say that.
I especially love the statement on their website indicating that they
took "hostile environment training" with the SAS and also learned how
to light a fire by rubbing sticks together.
Out west we'd call them drug store cowboys and most folks would come away
saying all hat and no cattle.
Pat
G'ville, NV
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]