Page 1 of 1
old klr or new klr
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 8:14 pm
by KC0HNG, Lawrence Brewster
So, I have decided to finally fall into the KLR Trap. I currently
have an awesome 1993 Honda Nighthawk 750, but am looking to upgrade to
a different bike. I've been wanting a KLR for years, and finally went
to go seriously look at some this week. I rode both a new one (08)
and a older(05) one. The 05 is in great condition, and was barely
ever ridden. in fact, it only has 600 miles on it. I am having a
really hard time deciding which one to go with. I wil be doing a lot
of commuting, but i want to go anywhere on a new bike. what are some
favorite pros and cons of the two, and are there any other good
comparison sites of these out there? thanks for your opinions...
old klr or new klr
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 8:52 pm
by Blake Sobiloff
On May 5, 2007, at 4:43 PM, KC0HNG, Lawrence Brewster wrote:
> I am having a
> really hard time deciding which one to go with. I wil be doing a lot
> of commuting, but i want to go anywhere on a new bike.
New or old will do what you want. There's a ton of add-ons for the
old one, but it'll take a while to figure out what will work on the
new one and some changes may need to be made to the accessories to
make them fit, depending on the accessory of course. The new one
seems a little nicer to me--better wind protection, better (now up to
middle-of-the-road quality) suspension, more juice for electrical
accessories, and better lighting. However, if you can strike a good
deal on the older one you'll have more money in your pocket for
accessories that are immediately available.
Clear as mud, eh?

--Blake, who passed his Technician's exam last week, but is still
waiting for his callsign

--
Blake Sobiloff
http://sobiloff.typepad.com/blakeblog/>
http://sobiloff.typepad.com/klr_adventure/>
San Jose, CA (USA)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
old klr or new klr
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:52 pm
by Russell Scott
I looked at the new one today, and unless your budget is really tight, there
is no way I would by a stock old KLR over the stock new KLR, unless I could
get it for at least $2000.00 less. Kawi hit a home run with the new KLR.
Everything that matters they fixed, or beefed up, and threw in a few
surprises. I like the fact the instruments are much better, and mounted on
the fairing, not the triple clamp, so they don't move when you steer. Also
the way the faring wraps around the gas tank. No more of those cheesy
plastic flaps. And lighting is much better all around. Modern hand gripes
and bar weights. I was impressed, and why anybody would buy a new BMW F650
or DR 650, when they can have this, is just plain nuts.
I'm just glad my '99 still runs so well, and has the important mods, or I
would have walked out of there with a new one, and my wife would be yelling
at me right now.
R
-----Original Message-----
From:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of KC0HNG, Lawrence Brewster
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 4:44 PM
To:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Old KLR or New KLR
So, I have decided to finally fall into the KLR Trap. I currently
have an awesome 1993 Honda Nighthawk 750, but am looking to upgrade to
a different bike. I've been wanting a KLR for years, and finally went
to go seriously look at some this week. I rode both a new one (08)
and a older(05) one. The 05 is in great condition, and was barely
ever ridden. in fact, it only has 600 miles on it. I am having a
really hard time deciding which one to go with. I wil be doing a lot
of commuting, but i want to go anywhere on a new bike. what are some
favorite pros and cons of the two, and are there any other good
comparison sites of these out there? thanks for your opinions...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
old klr or new klr
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 11:04 pm
by Harold & Peni
Blake,
Sound advice on the new/old KLR's and congrats on getting your 'ticket' ~ ' - )
73,
Harold - KD7YOE
..................................
On May 5, 2007, at 4:43 PM, KC0HNG, Lawrence Brewster wrote:
> I am having a
> really hard time deciding which one to go with. I wil be doing a lot
> of commuting, but i want to go anywhere on a new bike.
New or old will do what you want. There's a ton of add-ons for the
old one, but it'll take a while to figure out what will work on the
new one and some changes may need to be made to the accessories to
make them fit, depending on the accessory of course. The new one
seems a little nicer to me--better wind protection, better (now up to
middle-of-the-road quality) suspension, more juice for electrical
accessories, and better lighting. However, if you can strike a good
deal on the older one you'll have more money in your pocket for
accessories that are immediately available.
Clear as mud, eh?

--Blake, who passed his Technician's exam last week, but is still
waiting for his callsign

--
Blake Sobiloff
http://sobiloff.typepad.com/blakeblog/>
http://sobiloff.typepad.com/klr_adventure/>
San Jose, CA (USA)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
old klr or new klr
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:18 am
by Norm Keller
You really need to decide on the long term when making the decision.
The new one has 280 watt alternator vs 200 watt, better brakes, heavier forks, etc. If you plan to keep it long term and farkle, it then the new bike may not be more expensive.
Being very conservative, the looks will take some adjustment for me but the reported better fairing (especially quieter) would sway me heavily.
If you were following the KLR lists early on, the whining and gnashing of teeth over the new design was really amusing. Lots of statements made on the basis of no knowledge. It seems that the new machine is not what the nay-sayers wanted to believe. Since $ isn't that important, I'd go with the new model.
Just my $0.02,
Norm
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
old klr or new klr
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 12:41 pm
by revmaaatin
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "KC0HNG, Lawrence Brewster"
wrote:
>
> So, I have decided to finally fall into the KLR Trap. I currently
> have an awesome 1993 Honda Nighthawk 750, but am looking to upgrade to
> a different bike. I've been wanting a KLR for years, and finally went
> to go seriously look at some this week. I rode both a new one (08)
> and a older(05) one. The 05 is in great condition, and was barely
> ever ridden. in fact, it only has 600 miles on it. I am having a
> really hard time deciding which one to go with. I wil be doing a lot
> of commuting, but i want to go anywhere on a new bike. what are some
> favorite pros and cons of the two, and are there any other good
> comparison sites of these out there? thanks for your opinions...
>
Lawrence
Truthfully, you ARE looking at two new bikes (might need a battery
sooner on the O5 ;~D I would imagine that you could consider the
warranty as an issue, but I would think the difference could be as much
as $1500-2000 between the bikes. For me, that $1500 could be a 2d KLR,
(10 year old KLR). shrug. Any farkle on the 2005?
Are both bikes at the same dealer? See if he will give you a 6 m
dealer warranty on the O5. or dealer cost discount on parts for the
first XXX months.
But there is something to be said for buying new, personal pride
etc...but for $1500 difference, I think I could buy a whole lot of
farkle and still basically have a new bike. shrug. There is little to
fear of the 05 unless you can see it has been beat severely or stolen,
etc.
Many, many, many KLR's ridden here on the list were bought like your
05' less than 2000 miles, 2d/3d owner. I am the third owner of my 2001
A15, it came with 2505 miles, and about $500 farkle. If it goes right
this summer, I will get a 2d KLR, 2004 with 1000 miles and I will be
the 4th owner!?!?!?! go figure? You will either love the bike or you
won't. If you buy the O5 and don't like the bike, you will/might get
most of your money back...not so likely on the 08, depreciation, etc is
very steep on that new MC.
Let us know what you pull the trigger on. Either way, you are going to
need a new toothbrush...as your big grin is going to collect a lot of
bugs.
revmaaatin.
a strange sound when i accelerate.....mostly in lower gears...a
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 2:04 pm
by zaner32
Maybe cush drive is worn out, or have a small rock in there??
The reason I say this is that the big single sends power out in unvene
pulses, and if the cush drive would be worn out it could possibly make
that noise (metal on metal hits would sound like a ball bearing
rattling in a can), however, I have never heard of one wearing out.
It's very easy to check out by removing the rear wheel and looking
behind the sprocket for wear or intrusive items located here.
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "rickyrifraf"
wrote:
>
> Going insane, my KLR has been making this sound since I bought it
used
> a few years ago, nobody has been able to fix it...when I
> accelerate...after it has been warmed up ( i am quite sure of this )
> it sounds like someone is shaking a ball bearing inside an empty
> can...it drives me insane, and gets worse and worse as my driving
time
> extends...and starts happening in higher gears as i drive more.
>
> I have to really let the clutch out slow and accelerate super slow
in
> order to reduce it.
>
> Any suggestions would be highly apreciated!!!
>