kawasaki updates the klr for 2008?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:01 pm
Wilsons Sandbox
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=262104
Well it sounds like there's a lot to like in the new model. Better alternator, stiffer forks, better brakes, better suspension, better seat. A bit more power, and a nicer fairing. I also like that it's still pretty recognizable as a KLR. Too bad the gearbox is still a 5 speed. I'll have to see it in person to judge the crash worthiness of it. My biggest disappoint is that I'm a long way from wearing out my 2001. Matt Knowles - Ferndale, CA - http://www.knowlesville.com/matt/motorcycles '99 Sprint ST - for going fast and far (2CZUSA) '01 KLR650 (A15) - for exploring the North Coast backroads '97 KLX300 & '01 Lakota - for playing in the dirt '79 KZ400 - just because it was the first vehicle I ever owned
Don't forget a little larger gas tank, twin headlights, better radiator, and a "double engine balancer" revised balancer system! I'm not so keen on the reduced suspension travel, and we don't know what the overall weight is, but I'm guessing that it'll be a bit lardier than ever. [sigh] Really bummed there isn't a 6-speed transmission, and I doubt the new brakes offer much improvement (20 mm isn't that big of a difference--probably just enough to keep up with the additional weight). I think they're a bit off on their electrical specs, too; they keep saying the total system capacity is only 36W, but that can't be correct--that's not enough to even light the headlight! Working some numbers, I think they mean 236W, which at 17.5A gives us almost 14V. Sounds about right. Sure wish there were some HP/torque specs. -- Blake Sobiloff http://sobiloff.typepad.com/> http://sobiloff.typepad.com/klr_adventure/> San Jose, CA (USA) -- Blake Sobiloff http://sobiloff.typepad.com/> http://sobiloff.typepad.com/klr_adventure/> San Jose, CA (USA)> Well it sounds like there's a lot to like in the new model. Better > alternator, stiffer forks, better brakes, better suspension, better > seat. A bit more power, and a nicer fairing.
----- Original Message ----- From: CA Stu To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:58 PM Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Kawasaki updates the KLR for 2008? http://www.motorcycledaily.com/23september06_klr650.htm [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Not sure of that. Claimed gas tank capacity is same as Kawasaki has always claimed for the KLR.> > On 9/23/06, Matt Knowles wrote: > > Well it sounds like there's a lot to like in the new model. Better > > alternator, stiffer forks, better brakes, better suspension, better > > seat. A bit more power, and a nicer fairing. > > Don't forget a little larger gas tank,
They probably had to change the radiator (and the thermostat) in order to get better temperature control in order to meet emissions. The headlights will be greatly appreciated though!> twin headlights, better > radiator,
Uhm, they didn't say they revised it. Look at the bigger picture at http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/Article_Page.aspx?ArticleID=3748&Page=1 You'll see that KHI hasn't changed anything about the engine that they weren't forced to change by emissions. The engine basically has a new head and new piston and rings, and that's it. That's all they had to do, so that's all they did. Well, they also upped the electrical capacity slightly to deal with the new headlight system, big whoop. My suspicion is that Eagle Mike is still in the doohickey business for a while to come :-}.> and a "double engine balancer" revised balancer system!
Frame looks identical in the big Kawasaki publicity still too. Even the front engine mounts look identical. My suspicion is that there's basically no change in weight, or if any change, maybe 10 pounds more up at the beak.> > I'm not so keen on the reduced suspension travel, and we don't know > what the overall weight is, but I'm guessing that it'll be a bit > lardier than ever. [sigh]
We're talking Kawasaki. They never redesign anything they don't have to redesign LOL! It's clear from the publicity stills that they haven't touched the bottom end of the engine, other than to perhaps re-balance the crankshaft for the new piston.> Really bummed there isn't a 6-speed transmission,
Any improvement is welcome. The stock front brake is pretty scary on the street.> and I doubt the new > brakes offer much improvement (20 mm isn't that big of a > difference--probably just enough to keep up with the additional > weight).
Kawasaki has never released HP/torque specs for the current KLR. Why do you expect them to do so for the new one? _E> Sure wish there were some HP/torque specs.
I'll be darned--you're right! I guess I was thinking of the effective capacity.> --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Sobiloff" wrote: > > Don't forget a little larger gas tank, > > Not sure of that. Claimed gas tank capacity is same as Kawasaki has > always claimed for the KLR.
Yep. I wonder how we can get Bill Watson to evaluate the new cooling system...> They probably had to change the radiator (and the thermostat) in order > to get better temperature control in order to meet emissions.
Sigh, right again.> > and a "double engine balancer" revised balancer system! > > Uhm, they didn't say they revised it.
I don't understand why in this day and time they didn't go for fuel injection. BMW singles - thus fitted - get 70 mpg. Bogdan