Page 1 of 1
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:22 am
by Michael Silverstein
Would the plastic IMS tank be adequate to protect the radiator in a fall
or would I still need metal guards?
Thanks, Mike A18
Keeper of the KLR650 tires page:
[
www.mindspring.com/~mssilverstein/motor ... r650/tires]
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/251 - Release Date: 2/4/2006
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:13 am
by Bogdan Swider
> Would the plastic IMS tank be adequate to protect the radiator in a fall
> or would I still need metal guards?
>
I've only experienced low speed falls but my guess would be that you don't
need metal guards. I don't recall seeing a single IMS tank with them aside.
I do remember a post several years ago that described a fall at speed. Can't
remember his name but some will - it was the guy from Texas that suffered
from a disease, lupus I think. He said the tank survived in good order and
also protected all underneath.
Bogdan
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:01 am
by J Fortner
> Would the plastic IMS tank be adequate to protect the radiator in a fall
> > or would I still need metal guards?
>
The IMS tank is very thick in the wings that protect the radiator and
overflow. I have never had nor heard of an IMC tank puncture.
Jim
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:08 pm
by Krgrife@aol.com
In a message dated 2/5/2006 7:28:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bSwider@... writes:
I've only experienced low speed falls but my guess would be that you don't
need metal guards. I don't recall seeing a single IMS tank with them aside.
I do remember a post several years ago that described a fall at speed. Can't
remember his name but some will - it was the guy from Texas that suffered
from a disease, lupus I think. He said the tank survived in good order and
also protected all underneath.
A few years ago I did a short review of that tank for DSN and reported
crashing hard on the radiator side with no damage besides scratches to the edge of
the tank. The next year I crashed hard on the right side again with no
damage beyond scratches to the tank shroud edge.
Kurt
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:24 pm
by Douglas Bouley
just curious: why are these tanks sometimes referred to as "for off
road only"?
Doug
On Feb 5, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Krgrife@... wrote:
> In a message dated 2/5/2006 7:28:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> bSwider@... writes:
>
> I've only experienced low speed falls but my guess would be that
> you don't
> need metal guards. I don't recall seeing a single IMS tank with
> them aside.
> I do remember a post several years ago that described a fall at
> speed. Can't
> remember his name but some will - it was the guy from Texas that
> suffered
> from a disease, lupus I think. He said the tank survived in good
> order and
> also protected all underneath.
>
> A few years ago I did a short review of that tank for DSN and reported
> crashing hard on the radiator side with no damage besides scratches
> to the edge of
> the tank. The next year I crashed hard on the right side again
> with no
> damage beyond scratches to the tank shroud edge.
> Kurt
>
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:37 pm
by Douglas Bouley
had a feeling it might be something like that.
thanks for the heads-up.
Doug
On Feb 5, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Eric Lee Green wrote:
> Douglas Bouley wrote:
>> just curious: why are these tanks sometimes referred to as "for
>> off road only"?
>>
> Two reasons. 1) they don't meet California emissions requirements,
> 2) They are not DOT-certified for on-road use. In general DOT
> requires metal fuel tanks unless specifically certified (such as
> the plastic fuel tanks on the KTM Adventure 950), under the notion
> that somehow metal fuel tanks are tougher than plastic ones.
> Apparently the last time they looked at that issue was in 1925, at
> which time the only plastic available was that crumbly Bakelite
> stuff (just kidding, but you get the point!).
>
> That said, I've never heard of anybody pulled over for having the
> IMS tank. It doesn't appear to be on law enforcement's radar.
>
> _E
>
>
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:39 pm
by Eric Lee Green
Douglas Bouley wrote:
> just curious: why are these tanks sometimes referred to as "for off
> road only"?
>
Two reasons. 1) they don't meet California emissions requirements, 2)
They are not DOT-certified for on-road use. In general DOT requires
metal fuel tanks unless specifically certified (such as the plastic fuel
tanks on the KTM Adventure 950), under the notion that somehow metal
fuel tanks are tougher than plastic ones. Apparently the last time they
looked at that issue was in 1925, at which time the only plastic
available was that crumbly Bakelite stuff (just kidding, but you get the
point!).
That said, I've never heard of anybody pulled over for having the IMS
tank. It doesn't appear to be on law enforcement's radar.
_E
ims tank vs. radiator guards
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:51 pm
by Krgrife@aol.com
In a message dated 2/5/2006 10:45:38 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
eric@... writes:
That said, I've never heard of anybody pulled over for having the IMS
tank. It doesn't appear to be on law enforcement's radar.
The only question a CHP officer has ever asked me about the IMS tank is "How
far can you go with that sucker?"
Kurt
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
digest number 7021
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:24 pm
by CCook82@aol.com
In a message dated 2/5/2006 8:54:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com writes:
>Message: 10
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:46:46 -0800
> From: Blake Sobiloff Subject: Re: New KLR650 owner as of today!
>On Feb 4, 2006, at 5:26 PM, coreyzzzz2000 wrote:
> so today I picked up a 2000
> (A14) with 19000 miles on it for $1500.
>Congrats and welcome!
Blake, welcome from another newbie. Just bought an 02 model KLR 650 with
7700 miles on it (I hope). Have put about 150 miles on it to date, about 100
of those on forest service roads in east TN and western NC. I love the basic
bike. I am amazed at how well it goes on the road. The suspension off road
is another story. I preloaded the fork springs another 3/4 inch and that
really helped the front. Sag with me seated is about 1 1/2 ' on front now.
But I have rear preload up to 3 or 4 of 5 on adjustment, and I am sagging
about 3" with no gear on. Is this normal?? I am 6' 1" at 185 pounds no gear,
probably about 200# coat, pants and boots. What is the full wheel travel on
the stock front and rear??
I know there are suspension mods. Also got to get skid plate, radiator
guard, etc. Just trying to see what has to be done now and what can be a work in
progress. This is one of several bikes, and they are all on a budget. Love
the few posts I have read from the group so far. Cliff Cook in TN
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]