ethics and bad name [dsn_klr650] i'd like louder exhaus
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 9:40 am
People will hate me but I agree on the noise in the blind spot. I
always know where that Harley is in that blind spot.
Criswell
On Saturday, August 6, 2005, at 09:44 PM, Kip C. Anderson wrote: > I really don't see the point in even making the arguement about noise > and > 'giving motorcyclists a bad name'. The fact is: You can choose to > make > your bike noisy or not, but whichever you decide, somebody else will > do it, > and people will make their judgements based upon THEM - not > necessarily YOU. > > Your conscience should be your guide, not what people who don't even > know > you think - unless of course your noise levels violate your local > statutes, > in which case it's between you and law enforcement. > > Frankly, my KLR has seen nearly 60,000 miles on the stock system and > will > probably end up a little noisier at some point in the near future > because > yes, it can reduce accidents. I'll grant that statistics may not > support > it, but for that brief moment I move through a blind spot, a louder > exhaust > provides an additional clue to the Last Minute Larry's who would change > lanes into me that they better look around a little more thoroughly > before > doing it. > > - > Kip > Eugene, OR > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Ryder" > To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 7:58 PM > Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: I'd like louder exhaust, no jetting. > Impossible? > (probably NKLR) > > >> Thanks for the reply. For the record I'm fairly learned and >> comfortable in my ethics. My query was meant to be more of a >> technical one and not a political/ethical one. I probably shouldn't >> have even mentioned "why" I want my bike louder as that really may >> have clouded the point of the post. >> >> I realize the politically correct crowd is well intentioned and >> appreciate their efforts to attempt to make the world a better place >> for us all, opposite people who see the world burning and sit back >> and do nothing and say nothing; I mean that in all sincerity. At the >> same time I personally prefer to confine my own discussions of >> politics and ethics to threads dedicated thereto rather then >> potentially bog down every single thread in topics nowhere near what >> the originator intended to discuss. For that reason in the future >> when I ask something like how to make my KLR louder and get multiple >> responses that assume I haven't thoroughly considered all ethical >> ramifications at length and need assistance in determining how to be >> a good person, I will probably ignore such off-topic replies. I >> truly do not mean to be offensive. I just want to explain why I will >> may not respond to such replies in the future, and move on from there. >> >> I typically participate in good ethical debates in threads of their >> own. I am an avid amateur herpitologist (I keep and breed reptiles) >> and have posted to rec.pets.herp on usenet for...easily 15 years+. >> As you might imagine I am not new to newsgroup ethical debates, but I >> believe they have their place and time lest newsgroups will prove >> utterly useless as a wasteland for flames not unlike hell itself. >> >> Again, I appreciate your taking the time to reply to me. All the >> best... >> >> PS - I wasn't going to reply to this however I'm getting some replies >> sent to me personally and wanted to answer everyone in one shot. >> >> -Bill R. > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >