Page 1 of 3
doohickey questions
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 10:03 am
by tomklra14
After looking as Devon's site I understand (I think) what the
Dohickey is and what it does but I still have some questions.
1. Does anyone know what the OEM doohickey failure rate is; is it 1
in a 100 bikes, 1 in a 1000, 1 in 10?
2. Do you need the special tool to change the doohickey and if so
where do you get it and for how much?
My bike is approaching 12,000 miles and I am getting a little
paranoid that my OEM doohickey is going to fail on me in the middle
of the desert.
Thanks,
Tom
doohickey questions
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 10:29 am
by Allan Patton
Good questions. My bike has 47,000 miles and I am getting a little
paranoid that my OEM doohickey is going to fail on me in the middle
of the desert after reading so much about it here.
Allan
A14
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 11:50 am
by guymanbro
1. We have just over 2000 members and roughly 6 reported failures.
That means that 1 in every 333-1/3 bikes could be affected (if we are
a scientifically sound sampling of KLRs on the road).
2. Yes, you need a rotor holder wrench (big effin wrench) and a
magneto puller (big effin' bolt) along with some standard tools. The
usual suspects will have the tools you need (Fred @ Arrowhead, Ron
Ayers, etc.). If I remember correctly it's about $40 for the two...
dat brooklyn bum (it wasn't so long ago that I had a short term
memory....or was it?)
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "tomklra14" wrote:
> After looking as Devon's site I understand (I think) what the
> Dohickey is and what it does but I still have some questions.
>
> 1. Does anyone know what the OEM doohickey failure rate is; is it
1 in a 100 bikes, 1 in a 1000, 1 in 10?
>
> 2. Do you need the special tool to change the doohickey and if so
> where do you get it and for how much?
>
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 1:48 pm
by Krgrife@aol.com
In a message dated 6/15/02 9:51:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
guymanbro@... writes:
<< 1. We have just over 2000 members and roughly 6 reported failures.
That means that 1 in every 333-1/3 bikes could be affected (if we are
a scientifically sound sampling of KLRs on the road). >>
I don't think these are accurate figures, my '91 failure was reported to this
board 4 years ago. It was in the "catastrophic" catagory. This was one of
the early failures that triggered a lot of discussion including accusations
that I was being alarmist in some kind of plot to drive down prices of used
KLR's. As a result I have left these discussions mostly to others. My '97
also had a failure. I personally know of 3 other failures just in my small
area of California and from time to time have reported them on this list.
Kurt Grife
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 2:37 pm
by Tengai650
At 2:47 PM -0400 6/15/2002, Krgrife@... wrote:
>In a message dated 6/15/02 9:51:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>guymanbro@... writes:
>
> That means that 1 in every 333-1/3 bikes could be affected (if we are
> a scientifically sound sampling of KLRs on the road). >>
>
>I don't think these are accurate figures, my '91 failure was reported to this
>board 4 years ago. It was in the "catastrophic" catagory. This was one of
>the early failures that triggered a lot of discussion including accusations
>that I was being alarmist in some kind of plot to drive down prices of used
>KLR's.
But as I recall, wasn't your failure due to the tensioner system not
working properly and/or running out of travel due to the weak spring
and keeper plate embossing on pre-96's?
I think Tumu was referring only to failures of shattered and
broken-weld doohickeys:
http://www.personal.psu.edu/mjv2/IdlerLever.jpg
Mark
B2
A2
A3
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:45 pm
by kcuf_oohay_666
When I first heard about the doohickey failure I didn't think much
about it. Tought it was a few isolated cases. Then I saw the picture
of the broken doohickey that someone posted (thank you whoever you
are). Didn't relize what a cheap piece of S#!t that little part was.
Now Im afraid that my doohicky is broken.
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., Krgrife@a... wrote:
>
> I don't think these are accurate figures, my '91 failure was
reported to this
> board 4 years ago. It was in the "catastrophic" catagory. This was
one of
> the early failures that triggered a lot of discussion including
accusations
> that I was being alarmist in some kind of plot to drive down prices
of used
> KLR's. As a result I have left these discussions mostly to
others. My '97
> also had a failure. I personally know of 3 other failures just in
my small
> area of California and from time to time have reported them on this
list.
> Kurt Grife
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:25 pm
by Combat_Tourer
Wow! This is so serendipitous.
Does this doohicky thingy exist under the flywheel?
I was just going to post about this particular area and now I'm
reading about failures?
I have been installing an ElectrexUSA stator all day and while
scraping gasket material from the cover and left side engine I notice
there is a "loose" chromed bolt. This is a bolt that can be accessed
at the bottom of the cover once you remove a rubber cap.
I had intended to torque it down but inspected what was going on in
there first. I then noticed what looks VERY much like this doohicky
thingy. What the hell is it and how do I deal with it? Can I torque
this bolt down?
This is not cool, not good news to here about this failure. I am
beefing my KLR up to take to South America this fall and I sure don't
need to be breaking down in the middle of the friggin jungle.
Help please.
Todd (Springfield, VA)
toddbpeer@...
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., Tengai650 wrote:
> At 2:47 PM -0400 6/15/2002, Krgrife@a... wrote:
> >In a message dated 6/15/02 9:51:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> >guymanbro@e... writes:
> >
> > > That means that 1 in every 333-1/3 bikes could be affected (if
we are
> > a scientifically sound sampling of KLRs on the road). >>
> >
> >I don't think these are accurate figures, my '91 failure was
reported to this
> >board 4 years ago. It was in the "catastrophic" catagory. This
was one of
> >the early failures that triggered a lot of discussion including
accusations
> >that I was being alarmist in some kind of plot to drive down
prices of used
> >KLR's.
>
> But as I recall, wasn't your failure due to the tensioner system
not
> working properly and/or running out of travel due to the weak
spring
> and keeper plate embossing on pre-96's?
> I think Tumu was referring only to failures of shattered and
> broken-weld doohickeys:
>
http://www.personal.psu.edu/mjv2/IdlerLever.jpg
> Mark
> B2
> A2
> A3
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 5:27 pm
by Krgrife@aol.com
In a message dated 6/15/02 12:37:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
Tengai650@... writes:
>I don't think these are accurate figures, my '91 failure was reported to
this
>board 4 years ago. It was in the "catastrophic" catagory. This was one of
>the early failures that triggered a lot of discussion including accusations
>that I was being alarmist in some kind of plot to drive down prices of used
>KLR's.
But as I recall, wasn't your failure due to the tensioner system not
working properly and/or running out of travel due to the weak spring
and keeper plate embossing on pre-96's?
I think Tumu was referring only to failures of shattered and
broken-weld doohickeys: >>
Yes, that was true on my '91 where the problem was mostly with the old
spring. My '97 had both a broken spring and broken lever arm. It appears to
me after working on both types that the cush drive in the pre '96 absorbed
the lash in the balancer chain (up to the point where the chain got too loose
and failed or came off the sprockets) and without the cush drive the
doohickey is the next weak link. In either case I have come to believe that
the vital thing is to keep the balancer chain well tensioned and my method,
as others have suggested here, is to take off the outer left cover and
physically make sure the lever arm is moved as far as it will go and then
retighten the locknut. Since I'm still not riding due to my January Baja
crash I've had way too much time to work on these things, in addition to the
two bikes mentioned I'm putting together a spare motor from a couple of
salvage ones that I picked up. I'll be riding again by the end of the year
and will get to put my repairs to the test.
Kurt Grife
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 6:08 pm
by W.V. Doran
Make that 7...very small part of doohickey still
living in the motor somewhere. So far no problems
(2000k).
> > >In a message dated 6/15/02 9:51:42 AM Pacific
> Daylight Time,
> > >guymanbro@e... writes:
> > >
> > > 6 reported
> failures.
> > > That means that 1 in every 333-1/3 bikes could
> be affected (if
> we are
> > > a scientifically sound sampling of KLRs on the
> road). >>
>
>
>
=====
WVDoran
Scottsdale, AZ
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
doohickey questions
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2002 9:30 pm
by Devon Jarvis
So take a look and see. To verify proper tensioner operation, you don't need
special tools. Just remove the bash plate, remove the outer magneto cover
(10 bolts), and CAREFULLY flip the cover to the right, so as not to pull the
stator wires. You will need to disconnect the neutral switch wire, it's the
only green one there (you'll see what I mean).
You'll see enough of the doohickey under the rotor to know it's in one
piece. Loosen the bolt, and try pushing the doohickey with a screwdriver to
either side. You'll see the chain get tighter or looser. If you push it so
it gets loose, it should spring back when you stop applying pressure. If so,
the spring is fine. Gently push the doohickey in the other direction
(clockwise, to tighten a little more) and tighten the locking bolt.
www.devonjarvisphoto.com/posted/KLR650/ ... ickey.html has some
photos that will show you what to expect.
Devon
A15
kcuf_oohay_666 wrote:
> When I first heard about the doohickey failure I didn't think much
> about it. Tought it was a few isolated cases. Then I saw the picture
> of the broken doohickey that someone posted (thank you whoever you
> are). Didn't relize what a cheap piece of S#!t that little part was.
> Now Im afraid that my doohicky is broken.