Wilsons Sandbox
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=249690
Jake's attacks were/are amusing. I voted to let him post whatever he wants. RM>So Scott, no personal attacks?
So, George Bush in November, eh? (A losing proposition however the election turns out.)> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, dumbazz650 wrote: > > >So Scott, no personal attacks? > > Jake's attacks were/are amusing. I voted to let him post whatever he > wants. > > RM
Not so fast... "A third of the American public believes U.S. forces have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, according to a recent poll. Twenty-two percent said Iraq actually used chemical or biological weapons." "Only 17 percent correctly said that none of the [9/11] hijackers was Iraqi" With a public that pays this kind of attention, anything is possible. RM>>RM So, George Bush in November, eh?
They didn't find any, but we know they used to be there. We know Iraq had them because we sold them the equipment to make them, as did France and Russia. Whether they stopped making them, and whether they actually destroyed them all (or just shipped them to Syria or just buried them out in the desert somewhere etc) nobody knows. The people who probably did know are dead. There was a story in the NY Post about a "WMD" that was actually an artillery shell that had no markings that it contained Sarin precursors. The shell is designed to mix parts A and B in flight, making the nerve agent AFTER it's fired, so it didn't work for the booby-trap it was rigged to. But that didn't stop the Post from running it in 72pt type above the fold on the front page- "WMD found in Iraq".>Not so fast... > >"A third of the American public believes U.S. forces have found weapons of >mass destruction in Iraq, according to a recent poll. >
They did. Wasn't in the last two gulf wars, but they used WMD's in the war with Iran. Google "halabja" and see what comes up.> Twenty-two percent >said Iraq actually used chemical or biological weapons." >
Yes, the "link" between Al Qaeda and the Hussein's (which never existed) is something that I amazed the administration still getting away with. Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological weapons. He used them in the past. He also lied extensively, including continuing to seek long-range missile technology. Funniest thing that happened was the North Koreans took a multi-million dollar deposit on a medium range ballistic missile system, them simply never delivered anything. Stiffed Iraq completely. Devon> >"Only 17 percent correctly said that none of the [9/11] hijackers was >Iraqi" > >
They didn't find any, but we know they used to be there. We know Iraq had them because we sold them the equipment to make them, as did France and Russia. Whether they stopped making them, and whether they actually destroyed them all (or just shipped them to Syria or just buried them out in the desert somewhere etc) nobody knows. The people who probably did know are dead. There was a story in the NY Post about a "WMD" that was actually an artillery shell that had no markings that it contained Sarin precursors. The shell is designed to mix parts A and B in flight, making the nerve agent AFTER it's fired, so it didn't work for the booby-trap it was rigged to. But that didn't stop the Post from running it in 72pt type above the fold on the front page- "WMD found in Iraq".>Not so fast... > >"A third of the American public believes U.S. forces have found weapons of >mass destruction in Iraq, according to a recent poll. >
They did. Wasn't in the last two gulf wars, but they used WMD's in the war with Iran. Google "halabja" and see what comes up.> Twenty-two percent >said Iraq actually used chemical or biological weapons." >
Yes, the "link" between Al Qaeda and the Hussein's (which never existed) is something that I amazed the administration still getting away with. Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological weapons. He used them in the past. He also lied extensively, including continuing to seek long-range missile technology. Funniest thing that happened was the North Koreans took a multi-million dollar deposit on a medium range ballistic missile system, them simply never delivered anything. Stiffed Iraq completely. Devon> >"Only 17 percent correctly said that none of the [9/11] hijackers was >Iraqi" > >
the> > > They did. Wasn't in the last two gulf wars, but they used WMD's in
> war with Iran. Google "halabja" and see what comes up.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail> > > rm@... wrote: > > >Not so fast... > > > >"A third of the American public believes U.S. > forces have found weapons of > >mass destruction in Iraq, according to a recent > poll. > > > They didn't find any, but we know they used to be > there. We know Iraq > had them because we sold them the equipment to make > them, as did France > and Russia. Whether they stopped making them, and > whether they actually > destroyed them all (or just shipped them to Syria or > just buried them > out in the desert somewhere etc) nobody knows. The > people who probably > did know are dead. There was a story in the NY Post > about a "WMD" that > was actually an artillery shell that had no markings > that it contained > Sarin precursors. The shell is designed to mix parts > A and B in flight, > making the nerve agent AFTER it's fired, so it > didn't work for the > booby-trap it was rigged to. But that didn't stop > the Post from running > it in 72pt type above the fold on the front page- > "WMD found in Iraq". > > > Twenty-two percent > >said Iraq actually used chemical or biological > weapons." > > > They did. Wasn't in the last two gulf wars, but they > used WMD's in the > war with Iran. Google "halabja" and see what comes > up. > > > > >"Only 17 percent correctly said that none of the > [9/11] hijackers was > >Iraqi" > > > > > Yes, the "link" between Al Qaeda and the Hussein's > (which never existed) > is something that I amazed the administration still > getting away with. > > Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological weapons. > He used them in the > past. He also lied extensively, including continuing > to seek long-range > missile technology. Funniest thing that happened was > the North Koreans > took a multi-million dollar deposit on a medium > range ballistic missile > system, them simply never delivered anything. > Stiffed Iraq completely. > > > Devon > > > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at > www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris > Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > >
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 rm@... wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Judson D. Jones wrote: > > >>RM > >So, George Bush in November, eh? > > Not so fast... > > "A third of the American public believes U.S. forces have found weapons of > mass destruction in Iraq, according to a recent poll. Twenty-two percent > said Iraq actually used chemical or biological weapons." > > "Only 17 percent correctly said that none of the [9/11] hijackers was > Iraqi" > > With a public that pays this kind of attention, anything is possible. > > RM this. > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, James L. Miller Jr. wrote: > In the first police action in 1991, we actually got them used on us. > http://www.cnn.com/US/9610/01/gulf.war/ Unfortunately, it was our own > people who blew up the dump at Khamisiyah, without first looking at > what was in there. Believe me, I was only 4k from the explosion took > place. I thought we were fighting again. And yes, I WAS downwind and > have the official gov't notice that I may have been exposed. > > 3 words: No $h!t Sherlock. > > millerized > http://www.gulfwarvetlawsuit.com/main.html > http://www.midtod.com/9710/gulfwar.phtml > http://www.alternativemedicine.com/AMHome.asp? > cn=Catalog&act=GetProduct&crt=ProductKey=361&Style=/AMXSL/EssayDetail. > xsl > > > > --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, Devon > wrote: > ." > > > > > They did. Wasn't in the last two gulf wars, but they used WMD's in > the > > war with Iran. Google "halabja" and see what comes up. > > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
> Ok, > Now go back and ask these same moron's what country New Mexico is in. > > Face it. Most people have no use for thinking. > > Denis > > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 rm@... wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Judson D. Jones wrote: > > > > >>RM > > > >So, George Bush in November, eh? > > > > Not so fast... > > > > "A third of the American public believes U.S. forces have found weapons of > > mass destruction in Iraq, according to a recent poll. Twenty-two percent > > said Iraq actually used chemical or biological weapons." > > > > "Only 17 percent correctly said that none of the [9/11] hijackers was > > Iraqi" > > > > With a public that pays this kind of attention, anything is possible. > > > > RM > this. > > > > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >