Wilsons Sandbox

> It's all new for 05 I seen parts of it and have a buddy at Kaw. All

On 6/21/2003 at 12:34 AM Jim wrote: >> It's all new for 05 I seen parts of it and have a buddy at Kaw. All >new motor Not KLX and not a Suz., Fuel injection with 42mm throttle >body, 6-speed,43mm inverted fork, 320mm disc up front, dry weight: >328 lbs, 7.8 gal tank, new lighter exhaust system, gear driven engine >balancer no doohickey >Well, if it comes out like this and works well, it sounds like my new >road saber will be out in '05. Must keep the A11 though. This new, >proposed, KLR almost sounds too good to be true. Most of our >complaints answered in a new bike. Mmmmm. Hey Tammy, any word on >brake piston quantity, will the forks be standard or inverted, rear >suspension, will the engine displacement stay the same? Anywhere we >can see a picture of this concept bike? You have definitely tickled >my interest. I don't need super light-speed bikes anymore, give me a >reliable thumper or non-cruiser twin and I'm happy as a skunk with >stink. Man, I need a napkin, just reading those few spec's has got me >drooling a bit. Have a nice day. > >Jim Sherlock >Cedar Creek, Texas > > > >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ >courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html >Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: >DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "tammy@d..." wrote: > Jim, > I was just play'n sorry for make'n ya drool.. > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 6/21/2003 at 12:34 AM Jim wrote: > > >> It's all new for 05 I seen parts of it and have a buddy at Kaw. All > >new motor Not KLX and not a Suz., Fuel injection with 42mm throttle > >body, 6-speed,43mm inverted fork, 320mm disc up front, dry weight: > >328 lbs, 7.8 gal tank, new lighter exhaust system, gear driven engine > >balancer no doohickey > > >Well, if it comes out like this and works well, it sounds like my new > >road saber will be out in '05. Must keep the A11 though. This new, > >proposed, KLR almost sounds too good to be true. Most of our > >complaints answered in a new bike. Mmmmm. Hey Tammy, any word on > >brake piston quantity, will the forks be standard or inverted, rear > >suspension, will the engine displacement stay the same? Anywhere we > >can see a picture of this concept bike? You have definitely tickled > >my interest. I don't need super light-speed bikes anymore, give me a > >reliable thumper or non-cruiser twin and I'm happy as a skunk with > >stink. Man, I need a napkin, just reading those few spec's has got me > >drooling a bit. Have a nice day. > > > >Jim Sherlock > >Cedar Creek, Texas > > > > > > > >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ > >courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > >Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: > >DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

> > It's all new for 05 I seen parts of it and have a buddy at Kaw. All > new motor Not KLX and not a Suz., Fuel injection with 42mm throttle > body, 6-speed,43mm inverted fork, 320mm disc up front, dry weight: > 328 lbs, 7.8 gal tank, new lighter exhaust system, gear driven engine > balancer no doohickey------------------------------------

On 6/21/2003 at 11:51 PM alldingosrred wrote: >--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "Jim" >wrote: >> > It's all new for 05 I seen parts of it and have a buddy at Kaw. All >> new motor Not KLX and not a Suz., Fuel injection with 42mm throttle >> body, 6-speed,43mm inverted fork, 320mm disc up front, dry weight: >> 328 lbs, 7.8 gal tank, new lighter exhaust system, gear driven engine >> balancer no doohickey>------------------------------------ >From: a silent observer and KLR owner. > >That post, at first unbeleveable, made me so geared for a '05 that I was >thinking how I would get the $$$ together. ( Not that I'm unhappy with my >stock A14, it stomps on the Earth.) I am disappointed and have wasted >valuable thougt time on how nice the dream '05 would be. Now, for a >probing question, The desire is out there for a rough-housing dual sport >good for the highway and f-ed grizzy trail without the KLR weaknesses. If >the dream '05 were for real how much would you pay for it over the $5000, >like the '03? > >I also think the '04 color s OK, once you drop the bike on both sides and >get a good mud/oil sludge on the rest of it. > >Adrian >Cincinnati, OH >Keep changing your oil. > > >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ >courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html >Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: >DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

> > It's all new for 05 I seen parts of it and have a buddy at Kaw.

> new motor Not KLX and not a Suz., Fuel injection with 42mm

> body, 6-speed,43mm inverted fork, 320mm disc up front, dry weight: > 328 lbs, 7.8 gal tank, new lighter exhaust system, gear driven

> balancer no doohickey > Well, if it comes out like this and works well, it sounds like my

> road saber will be out in '05. Must keep the A11 though. This new, > proposed, KLR almost sounds too good to be true. Most of our > complaints answered in a new bike. Mmmmm. Hey Tammy, any word on > brake piston quantity, will the forks be standard or inverted,

> suspension, will the engine displacement stay the same? Anywhere

> can see a picture of this concept bike? You have definitely

> my interest. I don't need super light-speed bikes anymore, give me

> reliable thumper or non-cruiser twin and I'm happy as a skunk with > stink. Man, I need a napkin, just reading those few spec's has got

> drooling a bit. Have a nice day. > > Jim Sherlock > Cedar Creek, Texas

> You can buy something close to that now, a KTM Adventure. Or for > something a little more stripped down but just as sexy there is the > LC4 Enduro. Some day, some day...... > > Bryan K > A14

On 6/22/2003 at 3:31 AM gpokluda wrote: >--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "bkowalca" >wrote: >> You can buy something close to that now, a KTM Adventure. Or for >> something a little more stripped down but just as sexy there is the >> LC4 Enduro. Some day, some day...... >> >> Bryan K >> A14 > >Yep, and if you order parts for your KTM Adventure today, you may >actually get them by '05. > > >Gino >www.rvmc.com > > > >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ >courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html >Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: >DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

----- Original Message ----- From: "gpokluda" To: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 8:31 PM Subject: [DSN_klr650] Re: NKLR: Re; '05 KLR > --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "bkowalca" > wrote: > > You can buy something close to that now, a KTM Adventure. Or for > > something a little more stripped down but just as sexy there is the > > LC4 Enduro. Some day, some day...... > > > > Bryan K > > A14 > > Yep, and if you order parts for your KTM Adventure today, you may > actually get them by '05. > > > Gino > www.rvmc.com

> You can buy something close to that now, a KTM Adventure. Or for > something a little more stripped down but just as sexy there is the > LC4 Enduro. Some day, some day...... > > Bryan K > A14