message to list moderator
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 6:55 pm
"bradcdavis" writes:
Ah, but the messages from the list do *not* have a Reply-To header. The list has performed a simple redirect. If you didn't want somebody to reply to you directly then you could have added a Reply-To header as I have done.> Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many times > sent email to the sender by accident.
I object. If you reply to something I write and really want me to see it then send it to me as well. Messages sent direct and not thru the list are sorted differently here for exactly that purpose. I pay a bit more attention to those sent direct than those thru a list. If you want to sent to the group then use your Reply To All function. If you don't want to send to the original sender then delete him/her from the address list before invoking send. Not in the current mail client I'm using at the moment but in mutt one can "reply" and is queried with the first address "[y]/n?". If one answers "no" then mutt offers the next address it finds. So a simple reply can easily be sent to any of the addresses in the headers. The list, or the original sender. If the list addresses were mangled as you suggest then even a Reply To All would fail to find the original sender. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@... ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.> If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it to "reply to > group".