Page 1 of 1
very nklr, to him who have an ear?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:28 am
by Renn
I try to joke around and have fun with this list, and I do, but this is not
one of those times. I will always run before I will fight, I don't know
how to fight, I only know how to survive. It seems that there are more
than a couple of Believers on this list and this is for you. As I watched
this tragedy unfold on TV (I watched it from just after the first plane flew in)
it was clear that this was terrorism. As I perceive it one of the most
logical methods of monitoring for possible terrorists would be to make sure that
everyone in the USA was accounted for. This could easily be done with
computer chips.
Renn
A15 (Rocinante)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
very nklr, to him who have an ear?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2001 6:48 am
by Tengai650
At 12:19 AM -0500 9/13/01, Renn wrote:
>As I perceive it one of the most
>logical methods of monitoring for possible terrorists would be to
>make sure that
>everyone in the USA was accounted for. This could easily be done with
>computer chips.
Now THAT's disturbing. I'd rather have the constant threat of
terrorism than have my movement monitored by our own government. I'll
have to pass on your Orwellian plan.
Mark
B2
A3
A3
very nklr, to him who have an ear?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:07 pm
by RichardM
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "Renn" wrote:
>As I perceive it one of the most logical methods of monitoring for
>possible terrorists would be to make sure that everyone in the USA
>was accounted for. This could easily be done with computer chips.
Must..... Not... Respond... To... Troll...
Can't... take... this pressure!!!
Big...
Brother...
Nanny...
state...
RM
very nklr, to him who have an ear?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2001 2:29 pm
by Swede
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., Tengai650 wrote:
> At 12:19 AM -0500 9/13/01, Renn wrote:
> >As I perceive it one of the most
> >logical methods of monitoring for possible terrorists would be to
> >make sure that
> >everyone in the USA was accounted for. This could easily be done
with
> >computer chips.
>
> Now THAT's disturbing. I'd rather have the constant threat of
> terrorism than have my movement monitored by our own government.
I'll
> have to pass on your Orwellian plan.
> Mark
> B2
> A3
> A3
I'd have to agree with Mark. I am a fighter as well as a survivor,
BUT I am in no way willing to give up the personal freedom of being
able to "disappear", if need be. It's not that I don't trust our
Government, I don't trust the people working in our government.
Besides they've already got my number as a gun owner. Terrorism, I
can deal with, being tracked by the NSA, CIA, or FBI scares the
crap out of me.
"Swede"
very nklr, to him who have an ear?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2001 9:26 pm
by Peter Dahlheimer, MD
yeah, and they could put remote destruct buttons on the chips in case any of
us "step out of line". cool...
_pete
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @... address at
http://mail.yahoo.com
very nklr, to him who have an ear?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2001 10:42 pm
by Renn
You are right, it is disturbing, but it is not MY plan. Take a quick
scan through the Bibles book of Revelation.
very nklr, to him who have an ear?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2001 11:18 pm
by jayed36@yahoo.com
>This could easily be done with computer chips.
Yanno, I tried this, but they just aren't salty enough for my
tastes. Maybe if they made them in BBQ flavor.
Jeff
A15
nklr test
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2001 2:55 am
by Glen Meyer
test
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]