Page 1 of 1
magazine test
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2001 3:21 pm
by BKGADGET@aol.com
I just received the April issue of Cycle Canada and on page 18 there is a
nice article comparing the KLR650 to the BMW F650GS. ("DOUBLE SINGLES")
The KLR fared pretty well, but it appears that the 2001 model tehy testedhad
been around the block more than once. The magazine was required to return the
bike to Kawasaki for replacement of the stock exhaust "to correct a curious
whistling that developed as the baffling shifted or deteriorated, something
that's not uncomon on a KLR650-A" They also had to have the waterpump seal
replaced to fix a coolant leak.
Their summary of the KLR had the following,
PROS
Low price, many practical virtues
Smoothly delivered low-end power
CONS
Wheezy top-end performance
Low-budget finish
The BMW was summed up as follows,
PROS
Unusually strong and smooth single
Good lightweight touring capability
CONS
Occasional injection glitch at low revs
Stubby front fender is inadequate
Bruce "Inspector Gadget" McCracken
99 VFR800
01 KLR (to be named at some future date)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
magazine test
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2001 8:40 pm
by Russell Scott
Kawi has a new v-twin 650 for their 2002 Prairie Quad. I wonder if we will be seeing that engine in a new KLR in the near future?
Russel'r
-----Original Message-----
From: BKGADGET@... [SMTP:BKGADGET@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:21 PM
To:
DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSN_klr650] Magazine Test
I just received the April issue of Cycle Canada and on page 18 there is a
nice article comparing the KLR650 to the BMW F650GS. ("DOUBLE SINGLES")
The KLR fared pretty well, but it appears that the 2001 model tehy testedhad
been around the block more than once. The magazine was required to return the
bike to Kawasaki for replacement of the stock exhaust "to correct a curious
whistling that developed as the baffling shifted or deteriorated, something
that's not uncomon on a KLR650-A" They also had to have the waterpump seal
replaced to fix a coolant leak.
Their summary of the KLR had the following,
PROS
Low price, many practical virtues
Smoothly delivered low-end power
CONS
Wheezy top-end performance
Low-budget finish
The BMW was summed up as follows,
PROS
Unusually strong and smooth single
Good lightweight touring capability
CONS
Occasional injection glitch at low revs
Stubby front fender is inadequate
Bruce "Inspector Gadget" McCracken
99 VFR800
01 KLR (to be named at some future date)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Visit the KLR650 archives at
http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650
Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@...
Let's keep this list SPAM free!
Visit our site at
http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
1986 klr 600
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2001 9:48 pm
by laferna@attglobal.net
I just purchased a 1986 KLR 600 last week. I would like to know if
any of the items made for the KLR 650, like side racks for panniers,
windshields, seats, etc. fit the older 1986 KLR.
Thanks;
Lucas.