[dsn_klr650] digest number 304

[Andy Watts]

Yes i'm pretty sure that that's right.. Funnily enough i ordered the same from my local Kawasaki dealer in Southampton (UK) last week for my aged 1987 model and received the very same KLR600 main manual... I think that the supplement just covers the differences between the 600 and the 650. On 2000-06-30 zmully@... said:

>All- >I recieved my service manual, supplement and owners manual today >from Kawasaki. They arrived in less than 3 days of me placing the >order on www.buykawasaki.com, needless to say I am very happy. But >when I tore open the mailer I found the service manual for the >KLR600. Is this right? I assume that all the critical components >are the same, but I just want to make sure that I go the right >thing. >Thanks all and have a happy Independence Day! >Zack

[Tom Simpson]

-----Original Message----- From: Zachariah Mully To: KLR650-List DSN_klr650@egroups.com> Date: Friday, June 30, 2000 3:09 PM Subject: [DSN_klr650] Just need to be reassured...

>All- > I recieved my service manual, supplement and owners manual today >from Kawasaki. They arrived in less than 3 days of me placing the order >on www.buykawasaki.com, needless to say I am very happy. But when I tore >open the mailer I found the service manual for the KLR600. Is this >right? I assume that all the critical components are the same, but I >just want to make sure that I go the right thing.

You got exacly what you should have received. Thats why the supplement is needed. Most of the core engine stuff is identical to the 600 but pretty much everything else is unique to the 650. -Tom '96 KLR 650

[JSherlockHolmes@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/30/00 11:38:49 AM Canada Central Standard Time, DSN_klr650@egroups.com writes: > Who says I'm coming in for a landin? I see a trail over them thar hills that I aint' rid yet. C'ya