[dsn_klr650] macintosh/windoze rant! waaaaaaaay nklr
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2000 8:03 pm
LOL, well stated Sarah.
Mark
B2
A2
Wilsons Sandbox
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/
http://www.frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=205513
Not so. They don't have higher clock speeds, they just use a lot more (expensive) L2 cache in their CPU. Besides, who uses Intel? AMD is where it's at. See: http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2495427,00.html Not trying to say> Umm. I'm not a mac person, but I do have to question a couple of things in > that last sentence. Inferior? Ahem, Macintosh processors usually have a > higher speed than the best thing money can buy by Intel.
Inferior monitors and graphics accelerators (Does anyone make a 3D accellerator for the Mac?) (Ever benchmarked a mac for 3D and CAD?) , inferior economic choices for any upgrade one wishes to make.> that Intel is hard to beat or anything. But, frankly, Macintosh stuff is > not usually inferior.
stock>Proprietary OS? Well, as you point out, you're > trapped in the MicroSlime evil empire. Sounds pretty proprietary to me if > you want to break free, but can't seem to do it. Linux can be run on a > Macintosh just as easily as it can be run on a PC. It's just that the
for.> software that comes with the hard drive is a lot easier to use than some > other kernel you have to install and give up all your familiar programs
Last I checked, on a PC you can still run DR. DOS, UNIX, OS/2, Sun, and yes, Windows. I was actually happy with DOS and win 3.11, but my wife is newer to computors and likes Win 95. I have seen a Mac run Linux, and Win 95, but both times that was through a mac kernal. Hey, I might be trapped in Windows, but I like it and have very few complaints about it.>
Yeah, I actually much prefer Lotus 1-2-3 and Lotus Office Suite in general, but I have to stay compatable with my school and other people I collaborate with, and Office is the best integrated software to work with for that. I have projects that use Word, Excel, Mathcad, Photo and Equation Editor all in the same report, and I don't know that Lotus can do that as easily. Actually, I know that it can't, as I ran into problems importing stuff from Mathcad into a Wordpro document. Hey, I'm not a geek. (No offense to you programers out there.) I'm a user, not a code writer, (Although I used to be a gamer and I'm taking my second C++ class right now.) so I don't really care how it works, so long as it works and works well. I haven't run into a single problem with Office 2000 (yet that is, but I did have a few with Office 95). For the last 6 months, I've been having to generate at least 2 reports per week, averaging about 20 pages per, with charts, tables and figures, and all while using Office. Sure, its bloated, but with a 20Gb hard drive selling for under $150 these days does it really matter? (I'm also running it from CD on my laptop.) The thing I hate is that I can no longer transfer documents doing the floppy shuffle, and have to use a Zip drive.> Office sucks. It's got insanely high overhead (more overhead than emacs > counts as insanely high in my book), Excel isn't all that great a > spreadsheet, and if it's got a flight simulator in the code, that seems a > little, ummm, over the top.
Just make sure to name it "PC Virus Alert" and it will go real far!> Frankly, the smugness of Macintosh users, and the snotty tone they use > whenever there's a Windows virus, really mostly makes me want to become a > virus hacker and aim it at Macintosh and target that flabby market that > doesn't expect the Spanish Inquisition! Don't ever tell me I should use a > Macintosh. I use what I use, and I haven't caught a single computer virus > yet. And I've been online continuously since 1990. (Oh no, I have no life! > Must go riding...) >