Page 1 of 1
hopefully not a repeat...
Posted: Sat May 06, 2000 4:40 pm
by Wontco@yahoo.com
New listmember here. I'm not a KLR owner YET. I WILL be though. I'll
probably wait till the end of the season to buy. This'll give me
plenty of time to save some more money, find a good bike near my
location and hopefully prices will be down a bit more, though I
wonder
if this theory really holds true. I'll be going for a 98 or 99 model
to avoid some of the depreciation, plus I think I like the old
Bluish-Green a little more than the olive (oh Vanity!).
So, here are my questions and I hope they're not repeats (I have been
scouring the archives though):
I'm assuming the A designations are particular to each year and go up
one as each new year comes out . i.e. 1999 is A13- 2000 is A14. If
this is wrong correct me. But, the real question is:
What does the California version, designated L I believe,have that
the
regular models don't. Is this undesireable? Is it a performance
robber? Or is there really not much of a difference? I ask because
I've heard that the L models still wind up at dealers in other parts
of the country.
Secondly, other than the usual things to look for and be wary of when
buying a used bike, are there quirks particular to the KLR that
should
be checked before I buy. Or are the things just bulletproof, and I
should settle for low milage, shut-up, and buy?!
Any input is appreciated, or refer me to the archive if you know it's
there, and I'll look harder.
Thanks,
Kevin B. in FL
[dsn_klr650] lane splitting (color me newbie)
Posted: Sat May 06, 2000 4:54 pm
by Conall O'Brien
>From: "Sarah Barwig"
>To: "DSN_klr650@egroups. com" DSN_klr650@egroups.com>
>Subject: FW: Re: [DSN_klr650] Lane Splitting (color me Newbie)
>Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 21:21:01 -0700
Conall wrote:
> > It's legal for bikes to share lanes with cars, but
> > not vice-versa.
Sarah says
>
>That's not what I've been led to understand from reading the vehicle
>code...
>Where did you hear that?
That's how I interpreted the law myself, nobody told me. Wishful thinking?
It may be a double standard but I'm not willing to give up my space to an
aggressive 4 wheeler just for the right to lane share myself. Cycles are
just too vulnerable.
>It's perfectly legal to put as many vehicles as will fit abreast in a lane
>with all vehicles completely contained with that lane.
>
>It's illegal for a car to force you out of a lane.
>
>It's your job to shift around in your lane so as to prevent lane sharing
>from happening to you.
I'll pull to the side if a faster lanesplitter wants to go past but I hope
the intent of the lanesharing law was not to let autos move past bikes. Just
my opinion.
> > next thing I
> > know he's trying to pass me in my lane.
>
>Yup. There's a lot of wackos out there.
>
>That recent event (pickup truck mows down (literally) KTM rider) just plain
>made me sick to my stomach. Any update on what happened to the truck
>driver?
>
I haven't heard anything, Citybike will keep us updated, I'm sure.
TTYL
Conall
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com