Page 1 of 1
[dsn_klr650] new list home questions -- no of subscribers and
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2000 2:41 pm
by Sarah Barwig
> Hullo,
>
> Is it just me or are the number of people subscribed to list slowly going
> down? When I got the email to "check it out" at egroups, I went there and
> saw that there was 543 members in the list. It currently stands at 538.
I'm guessing that egroups subbed everyone, then realized that some of us who
had subbed ourselves were double subbed, so they un-subbed us. Which leaves
eagle-eyed number watchers with a dwindling impression.
Sarah
[dsn_klr650] new list home questions -- no of subscribers and
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2000 2:52 pm
by Yusseri Yusoff
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Sarah Barwig wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that egroups subbed everyone, then realized that some of us who
> had subbed ourselves were double subbed, so they un-subbed us. Which leaves
> eagle-eyed number watchers with a dwindling impression.
>
Oh... and I thought it was because during the changeover process, some
people manage to escape the Borgification due to some sort of technical
glitch thus allowing themselves to dissimilate. Or, more seriously,
thought that this whole web-based thing is just a bunch of claptrap and
they'd rather wash their hands off it, thank you very much.
Yus
(so I find looking at the subscriber numbers fascinating... I'm a
bit sad that way, I guess
)
[dsn_klr650] new list home questions -- no of subscribers and
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2000 6:01 pm
by Arne Larsen
----- Original Message -----
From: Sarah Barwig
Subject: Re: [DSN_klr650] New list home questions -- No of subscribers and
attachments (att: Arne Listmeister)
> > Hullo,
> >
> > Is it just me or are the number of people subscribed to list slowly
going
> > down? When I got the email to "check it out" at egroups, I went there
and
> > saw that there was 543 members in the list. It currently stands at 538.
>
> I'm guessing that egroups subbed everyone, then realized that some of us
who
> had subbed ourselves were double subbed, so they un-subbed us. Which
leaves
> eagle-eyed number watchers with a dwindling impression.
>
> Sarah
Exactly Sarah! =^)
Cheers,
Arne
[dsn_klr650] question or two
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2000 6:06 am
by Kurt Simpson
> By filtering out the NKLR stuff, you miss out on some of the most unique
> apsects of this group. After a while, the KLR stuff becomes kinda boring.
yeah, like Gino's prison exploits...
Kurt