bad petcock or carb?

DSN_KLR650
tjtacke
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 9:46 pm

fuel economy

Post by tjtacke » Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:05 am

I live in Yuma, Arizona so therefore they are US gallons. We are near sea level and below sea level where I work. --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Eric L. Green" wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Jud Jones wrote: > > mpg when ridden veny gently. At 75-80 (gps) the mileage suffers,
of
> > course; it drops to the low 40s, only dipping into the 30's once,
when I
> > ran a tank of gas through it at 75 into a strong headwind, wih
full
> > touring luggage. Mileage in the 30s suggests that something is
wrong on
> > a bike that can get 55-60mpg. > > I have never, ever, gotten over 50mpg. Are you using Imperial
(Canadian or
> English) gallons rather than American gallons? Also, gas mileage
suffers
> at high altitude. I once had a Ford Aspire ("it aspires to be a
car") that
> would get 30mpg in the city at sea level, 35mpg on the highway at
sea
> level. Once I took it a couple thousand feet above sea level, I
lost 5mpg
> off both. > > Nowdays I usually average in the low 40's in a mix of surface
street and
> high speed freeway driving. The bike runs strong, the plug looks
good, I
> get the top speed I'm supposed to get, etc., it's just that my
right hand
> comes on too strong :-). But yes, it is possible to get mileage in
the
> 30's if you are running the bike flat-out at high altitudes with
luggage.
> The KLR just doesn't like that, it'll do it, but it lets you know. > > -E

tjtacke
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 9:46 pm

fuel economy

Post by tjtacke » Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:06 am

I have to run the crappy California gas........that is where ours comes from. I also have the CA smog equipment.
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "xt535" wrote: > > I have gotten as high as 65mpg, and generally average 60+mpg. The > lowest I've had was 55mpg, once! I'm in Pa, and elevation is below > 2K' for the most part. > > Mr Moose didn't believe the mileage numbers some guys reported until > he rode in to NOAB last spring. Once he got out of Ca with their > crap, so called gasoline, his mileage improved cosniderably. > > Certainly, mileage is going to be related to the throttle hand. > Shifting at lower revs and running at lower speeds will help. I > DON'T ride highways if possible, and generally exceed the posted > limits by 10mph or more....running 60-65mph indicated nets me 60- > 62mpg with 89 octane. I have a tall windscreen, low front fender, > and Supertrapp IDS exhaust. The only carb mod I've made was to > adjust the pilot mix screw out an additional turn. I'm running a > Twinair filter, had IRC GP1s until they were worn out, and now have > Pirelli MT90 S/Ts. > > BTW, The IRCs gave up very little on the street, and were much > better in dirt and gravel. > > Eric Stevens > Mechanicsburg, Pa > A7 > > > > I have never, ever, gotten over 50mpg. Are you using Imperial > (Canadian or > > English) gallons rather than American gallons? Also, gas mileage > suffers > > at high altitude. I once had a Ford Aspire ("it aspires to be a > car") that > > would get 30mpg in the city at sea level, 35mpg on the highway at > sea > > level. Once I took it a couple thousand feet above sea level, I > lost 5mpg > > off both. > > > > Nowdays I usually average in the low 40's in a mix of surface > street and > > high speed freeway driving. The bike runs strong, the plug looks > good, I > > get the top speed I'm supposed to get, etc., it's just that my > right hand > > comes on too strong :-). But yes, it is possible to get mileage in > the > > 30's if you are running the bike flat-out at high altitudes with > luggage. > > The KLR just doesn't like that, it'll do it, but it lets you know. > > > > -E

lesleyw
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:17 am

fuel economy

Post by lesleyw » Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:16 am

Most of you guys getting 55+mpg on your US gallons is a bit hard to take. 3.78 litres or so to a US gallon I think isn't it? I still think in mpg and do all my calculations accordingly and the best I've done is 55mpg but there're 4.54 litres in one of our gallons so I ought to be getting about 65mpg on my 2000km old '04 model. I wish!!

rsanders30117
Posts: 469
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 11:06 am

fuel economy

Post by rsanders30117 » Tue Apr 26, 2005 7:16 am

My A14 with 26.3K miles get about 45 miles/gal. However, I've got a 14 tooth front sprocket & a Dyno Jet stage 1 to eliminate lean surging. I believe to get >50 M/G you probably are running closer to the OEM lean settings & stock / or higher sprocket ratios. Also M/G is highly dependent on where & how ridden, tires, etc. I lose a lot of M/G on gravel roads due to tire slippage.
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "lesleyw" wrote: > > Most of you guys getting 55+mpg on your US gallons is a bit hard to take. > 3.78 litres or so to a US gallon I think isn't it? I still think in mpg and do > all my calculations accordingly and the best I've done is 55mpg but there're > 4.54 litres in one of our gallons so I ought to be getting about 65mpg on my > 2000km old '04 model. I wish!!

fasteddiecopeman
Posts: 813
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:05 pm

fuel economy

Post by fasteddiecopeman » Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:12 am

I get around 63 mpgImperial at around 120 to 130 kph on my '04 near Calgary. Ed
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "lesleyw" wrote: > > Most of you guys getting 55+mpg on your US gallons is a bit hard to take. > 3.78 litres or so to a US gallon I think isn't it? I still think in mpg and do > all my calculations accordingly and the best I've done is 55mpg but there're > 4.54 litres in one of our gallons so I ought to be getting about 65mpg on my > 2000km old '04 model. I wish!!

Peter Meilstrup

bad petcock or carb?

Post by Peter Meilstrup » Tue Apr 26, 2005 5:43 pm

Could also be a clogged/kinked gas tank vent line. Or on a California bike, california bike the charcoal canister may be filled up. Quick test: after it has stalled, try opening the gas cap and starting the bike with the cap open. If it fires right up, you've got a venting problem. -pm
On 4/26/05, Denis Dimick wrote: > > Here's the back ground: > > I own a 2000, currently just turned over 13,200 miles. About 4 weeks ago > it noticed what "felt" like I was running out of gas. Only had about 1/4 > of a tank left. > > From a stop sign I took off and then went into an "S" turn left then back > to the right. As I left the right turn, the bike lost power. Checked > everything out, it it looked like everything was OK. > > A few days later while doing a clover leaf turn to the right, and going up > hill, the same thing happened again. > > Later that night, while on a straight-away, the same power lose. > > I've tried a higher grade of gas, 86 to 88, and it doesn't seem to change > anything. > > This morning on my ride to work, I had to turn around and drop off my bike. > > With about a 1/4 tank of gas, I now need to have the choke on in order to > get the bike to run under load. If I'm stopped, it runs OK, a small bit of > power lose, at times, but as soon as I let the clutch out it stalls. > > I have ordered a petcock rebuild kit from BigCee, the one that allows you > to drop the vacuum line from the Carb. > > Anyone seen this before? Any Idea's? > > Thanks, > > Denis > > Archive Quicksearch at: http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests