[dsn_klr650] soft asphalt

DSN_KLR650
Post Reply
Jeffrey L. Walker
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 11:30 am

[dsn_klr650] digest number 269 suv's nklr

Post by Jeffrey L. Walker » Wed Jun 21, 2000 1:40 pm

> If you think back a few years, the only SUV's out there were the Ford
Bronco,
> Chevy Blazer, Dodge Ram Charger, Jeep CJ's, Jeep Cherokee/Wagoneer (large > body), Range Rovers, and Toyota Land Cruisers. On top of that, these
vehicles
> were primarily the domain of people like us. They were the KLR's of the
auto
> world. I have owned several of those myself. I currently own a 1979 Chevy > Blazer. I don't know what happened, but somehow people turned our > camping/dirt machines into ridiculous status symbols. Not to mention the > fact, that most of those 30K to 50K vehicles will never see the dirt, let > alone a water crossing. Sure, some people, us or people similar to us,
will
> truly use them for what they were originally designed to be used for, but > most will not. It is interesting the changes in SUV's and the people that
buy
> them. Personally, I think the fad will go away, especially with gas prices > going up the way they are, over $2.00 a gallon here in Milwaukee. At
least,
> let's hope so. But for carrying capacity, good fuel mileage, comfort, and > reliability, my family has selected the Ford Taurus Wagon. Isn't it funny, > and sometimes sad, how times change things. >
Absolutely right on the mark. In my family growing up, my father had a Jeep Wagoneer. (Tough rig!). We used it for fishing/hunting/skiing/camping/towing and winter driving. To go anywhere else, we had a Mazda GLC, and later a Ford Taurus (both of which did ok in the snow with traction tires and chains, so snow alone doesn't justify owning a SUV, the Taurus with ski-racks and snow tires became our main ski car, much better gas mileage). I am trying to follow the same example as my dad with my Isuzu Rodeo, except for going anywhere else I ride my KLR. I'm thinking about getting an older Volvo wagon for my wife so we can keep the miles off of the Isuzu. (That way I'll be able to stock parts that I can use for both my boat engine and the wagon, like oil filters and such, plus I like those Volvos for some reason.) If anyone out there absolutely feels that they have to have 4WD, I'd suggest a Subaru. If you need the cargo and passenger room then go with a mini-van (no shame in that, and definitely more practical.) A really good compromise I've seen is the Mazda MPV minivan in 4WD. (Mother-in-law has one, its pretty nice. Father-in-law is a business consultant, and bought a status symbol Mercedes M class, which I don't like as much. You know how sad SUV's have gotten when you consider the Toyota Landcruiser. It was once super tough, rivaling the Jeep, and used widely throughout the world. Now it is a 30 plus grand luxury status symbol box, with leather by god! For those of you who do own SUV's and actually use them off-road, I would suggest the biggest improvement you can make over stock: B.F. Goodrich All-Terrain TA/KO tires. The sand and mud traction is like night and day when compared to the stock Goodyear Wranglers that came on my Rodeo, and the street ride is pretty much the same as before. Jeff

PRBKLR@cs.com
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 10:41 am

[dsn_klr650] digest number 269 suv's nklr

Post by PRBKLR@cs.com » Wed Jun 21, 2000 3:12 pm

I have to admit. I live in suburbia and I own a '00 Explorer 2WD and a '00 Ranger 4WD. No, the Explorer does not go "off-roading", however it is very useful. My wife drives it, and we got it for several reasons. First, my wife is in Real Estate which means she takes clients around shopping for homes. The taller stance offers a better view of the area while driving and offers more room than most mid-size sedans. Also, with running boards, it is easier for most to get in and out of than a car. Second, she feels safer driving it given it's size and ride height. With all of the other SUV's on the road you can rarely see what's in front of you unless you are in one. Third, my wife has a large family, with many neices and nephews and the Explorer offers plenty of room for toting them around as well. The Ranger 4X4 was something to substitute for my F150 2WD. I have a truck mainly for hauling the KLR when necessary, and for misc. projects around the house, plus I just like driving them. I didn't buy the 4X4 necessarily for the fact that it is 4X4, but more because of the compromise of moving from a full size to a small truck. I just was not comfortable sitting so low to the ground. I also just plain like the look of the 4X4 over the 2WD. I know ocassionaly I will take it off-road, like on trips to CO., or the local trails when I want to take the family and the KLR. I acknowledge that many purchase these vehicles simply for status, and most will never see the dark of mud or dampness of river crossings unless they run off the road because they can't handle the monsters. There are some that have ligitimate uses for them as well. I only want a cattle guard on the front of my truck so I can shove people out of the way when driving too slow in the fast lane. So, I probably won't get one! IMO... Paul A13
> For those of you who do own SUV's and actually use them > > > >

Bogdan Swider
Posts: 2759
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 2:04 pm

[dsn_klr650] soft asphalt

Post by Bogdan Swider » Wed Jun 21, 2000 3:58 pm

> I keep a metal cover plate from an electrical outlet box in my jacket > pocket. > It has a long string tied to it so I can pull it up once I'm on the bike. > > Gino >
Great idea as long as you don't confuse it with the string you use when you need to go to the bathroom. But then that one's probably pink. Bogdan

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests