[dsn_klr650] re:scotchguard now cat converters(long)

DSN_KLR650
Post Reply
dave pumphrey
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 2:36 pm

please god noooooo

Post by dave pumphrey » Thu May 18, 2000 2:51 am

For the love all that is holy and good in the world say it isn't so. Kawasaki cannot be dropping the KLR 650 in favor of the KLE. I am a 32 year old father of two who is a full time law student. The only thing that keeps me sane is knowing that a Brand new 2001 KLR is going to be my graduation present to myself next year(I even have the full blessing of the love of my life who is soooo tired of hearing me whine about wanting one she is willing ride with me once I get it). I want, no I need, I must have, a real live honest to God trail busting, highway eating, big ass single cylinder, earth shakin', dual sport, get back to nature, ride it anywhere I damn well please, bike that will carry my big ass, more gear than I will ever need, a quart of real live Kentucky bourbon to sip on at camp, and six glorious gallons of decomposed dinosaur bones to get me to some far off destination I won't decide on until I am halfway there. And if I want to take the highway, a fire trail, or a damn rabbit track to get there I want a bike that will do the job. That 500cc two popper damn disco music looking KLE ain't it. If I wanted an EX 500 I would have bought one in high school. Please, someone tell me the KLR is not going to go the way of the Indians or I will have to drop out of school, teach my children a foreign language or four, and move to Europe where they actually seem to like DS bikes (of course one less {wannabe}lawyer in America may not be a bad thing). LONG LIVE THE KLR, THUMPERS FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!! p.s. road music - anything by Lyle Lovett ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Weaver, Mark
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 3:03 pm

[dsn_klr650] re:scotchguard now cat converters(long)

Post by Weaver, Mark » Thu May 18, 2000 10:53 am

well, i hope that's not straight, because except for unknown greenhouse effects, carbon dioxide is pretty benevolent. we breathe it out, it doesn't hurt us, plants dig it, it's totally non-poisonous. what could be better. i don't know much, but i always figured catalytic converters were more for dealing with bad stuff. anyone smart out there? mw
> Let me see if I can get this > straight... > > Carbon Dioxide is an air pollutant, and was found to contribute to > smog and general poor air quality. Solution? Catalytic converters! > Let's keep this list SPAM free! > > Visit our site at http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com > >

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests