hopefully not a repeat...

DSN_KLR650
Post Reply
guymanbro@excite.com
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 05, 2000 2:51 am

hopefully not a repeat...

Post by guymanbro@excite.com » Sat May 06, 2000 5:14 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@egroups.com, Wontco@y... wrote:
> I'm assuming the A designations are particular to each year and go
up one as each new year comes out . i.e. 1999 is A13- 2000 is A14. Precisely dear Watson. But, the real question is:
> > What does the California version, designated L I believe,have that > the regular models don't. Is this undesireable? Is it a
performance robber? Or is there really not much of a difference? I ask because I've heard that the L models still wind up at dealers in other parts of the country.
> > Secondly, other than the usual things to look for and be wary of
when buying a used bike, are there quirks particular to the KLR that should be checked before I buy. Or are the things just bulletproof, and I should settle for low milage, shut-up, and buy?!
> > Thanks, > Kevin B. in FL
To the best of my knowledge (drawn almost entirely from this list the main difference is an emissions thing which some say is a performance robber and others don't. But this list can help you bypass those systems if you find a bike you like at a price you like (say that 10 times fast) and it happens to be a Cali model. Mostly, as far as bulletproof goes, the KLR is...just be sure to check all bolts and fasteners as soon as you leave the dealer as they tend to forget the pure vibrating power of the beast we call our own. dat brooklyn bum

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests